Masafumi Kidoh 1 , Takeshi Nakaura 2 , Shinichi Nakamura 2 , Shota Nakamura 3 , Naritsugu Sakaino 3 , Kazunori Harada 4 , Shouzaburou Uemura 5 , Yasuyuki Yamashita 6 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
Show RCT »
Hide RCT «
BACKGROUND: The use of the smallest contrast dose is highly desirable in performing cardiac computed tomography (CT), especially for patients with cardiovascular diseases to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy . PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of 20% reduced contrast dose protocol in cardiac CT using 100 kVp and high-tube-current-time product setting . MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty patients were scanned with our conventional 120 kVp protocol, and the other 50 patients underwent scans using a tube voltage of 100 kVp, a high-tube-current-time product, and a 20% reduced contrast dose. We evaluated estimated effective dose (ED), CT attenuation, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the ascending aorta . We also evaluated CT attenuation of the coronary arteries. Two radiologists independently assessed image quality of coronary arteries . RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the ED between the 100 kVp and 120 kVp protocols (21.7 mSv ± 1.6 vs. 21.8 mSv ± 1.1, P=0.65). There was no significant difference in the CNR of the ascending aorta between the 100 kVp and 120 kVp protocols (18.8 ± 3.5 vs. 18.7 ± 3.8, P=0.98). Mean CT attenuation of the coronary arteries of the 100 kVp protocols was significantly higher than that of 120 kVp protocols (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the overall image quality of the coronary artery between the 100 kVp and 120 kVp protocols (3.7 ± 0.4 vs. 3.7 ± 0.5, P=0.65). CONCLUSION: For cardiac CT a voltage setting of 100 kVp and a high-tube-current-time product enable 20% reduction in the contrast dose without affecting the quality of coronary artery images compared with a 120 kVp and standard-contrast-dose CT protocol. © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2013 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.
RCT Entities: Population
Interventions
Outcomes
BACKGROUND: The use of the smallest contrast dose is highly desirable in performing cardiac computed tomography (CT), especially for patients with cardiovascular diseases to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy . PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of 20% reduced contrast dose protocol in cardiac CT using 100 kVp and high-tube-current-time product setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty patients were scanned with our conventional 120 kVp protocol, and the other 50 patients underwent scans using a tube voltage of 100 kVp, a high-tube-current-time product, and a 20% reduced contrast dose. We evaluated estimated effective dose (ED), CT attenuation, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the ascending aorta. We also evaluated CT attenuation of the coronary arteries. Two radiologists independently assessed image quality of coronary arteries. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the ED between the 100 kVp and 120 kVp protocols (21.7 mSv ± 1.6 vs. 21.8 mSv ± 1.1, P=0.65). There was no significant difference in the CNR of the ascending aorta between the 100 kVp and 120 kVp protocols (18.8 ± 3.5 vs. 18.7 ± 3.8, P=0.98). Mean CT attenuation of the coronary arteries of the 100 kVp protocols was significantly higher than that of 120 kVp protocols (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the overall image quality of the coronary artery between the 100 kVp and 120 kVp protocols (3.7 ± 0.4 vs. 3.7 ± 0.5, P=0.65). CONCLUSION: For cardiac CT a voltage setting of 100 kVp and a high-tube-current-time product enable 20% reduction in the contrast dose without affecting the quality of coronary artery images compared with a 120 kVp and standard-contrast-dose CT protocol. © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2013 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.
Entities: Disease
Species
Keywords:
Low contrast dose; contrast-induced nephropathy; coronary CT angiography; low kilo voltage; multidetector CT
Mesh: See more »
Substances: See more »
Year: 2013
PMID: 23969265 DOI: 10.1177/0284185113500669
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Radiol ISSN: 0284-1851 Impact factor: 1.990