Literature DB >> 23968807

Repeatability of anorectal manometry in healthy volunteers and patients.

Susanne D Otto1, Johanna M Clewing, Jörn Gröne, Heinz J Buhr, Anton J Kroesen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anorectal manometry is used extensively in the assessment of patients with disorders of the pelvic floor. The present study investigated the repeatability of anorectal manometry in healthy volunteers and patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 30 healthy volunteers (15 men and 15 women) and 10 patients with fecal incontinence (4 men and 6 women) underwent perfusion manometry and volumetry. Intraindividual variability was evaluated using the intraindividual correlation coefficient (ICC). Interindividual variability was expressed as the standard deviation from the calculated mean values.
RESULTS: We found a high intraindividual correlation for the squeezing pressure (ICC 0.75-0.95), vector volume (ICC 0.88-0.97), and rectal perception (ICC 0.82-0.98). The anal resting pressure showed moderate repeatability (ICC 0.60-0.72). However, with regard to sphincter asymmetry, rectal compliance, and the rectoanal inhibitory reflex, a wide range of variability was found. In the female volunteers, the squeezing pressure and vector volume were lower than in those in the male volunteers. The anal pressure, vector volume, thresholds for urgency, and the maximum tolerable volume were lower in the incontinent patients than in the healthy volunteers.
CONCLUSIONS: The squeezing pressure, vector volume, and rectal perception allow a reliable analysis of anal sphincter function. Sphincter asymmetry, rectal compliance, and the rectoanal inhibitory reflex were of limited diagnostic value.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anorectal; Incontinence; Manometry; Vector volume; Volumetry

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23968807     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current aspects and future prospects of total anorectal reconstruction--a critical and comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Roman A Inglin; Daniel Eberli; Lukas E Brügger; Tullio Sulser; Norman S Williams; Daniel Candinas
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Low preoperative maximum squeezing pressure evaluated by anorectal manometry is a risk factor for non-reversal of diverting stoma.

Authors:  Risa Fukui; Hiroaki Nozawa; Yugo Hirata; Kazushige Kawai; Keisuke Hata; Toshiaki Tanaka; Takeshi Nishikawa; Yasutaka Shuno; Kazuhito Sasaki; Manabu Kaneko; Koji Murono; Shigenobu Emoto; Hirofumi Sonoda; Hiroaki Ishii; Soichiro Ishihara
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Reproducibility of high-definition (3D) manometry and its agreement with high-resolution (2D) manometry in women with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  S Chakraborty; K J Feuerhak; A R Zinsmeister; A E Bharucha
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-10-02       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdinando D'Amico; Steven D Wexner; Carolynne J Vaizey; Célia Gouynou; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  Comparison of Anorectal Manometry Testing in Left Lateral and Lithotomy Positions.

Authors:  Priyanka K Kadam-Halani; Avita K Pahwa; Nathanael C Koelper; Lily A Arya; Mary D Sammel; Uduak U Andy
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.913

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.