Literature DB >> 23967587

How taxonomic diversity, community structure, and sample size determine the reliability of higher taxon surrogates.

Thomas M Neeson1, Itai Van Rijn, Yael Mandelik.   

Abstract

Ecologists and paleontologists often rely on higher taxon surrogates instead of complete inventories of biological diversity. Despite their intrinsic appeal, the performance of these surrogates has been markedly inconsistent across empirical studies, to the extent that there is no consensus on appropriate taxonomic resolution (i.e., whether genus- or family-level categories are more appropriate) or their overall usefulness. A framework linking the reliability of higher taxon surrogates to biogeographic setting would allow for the interpretation of previously published work and provide some needed guidance regarding the actual application of these surrogates in biodiversity assessments, conservation planning, and the interpretation of the fossil record. We developed a mathematical model to show how taxonomic diversity, community structure, and sampling effort together affect three measures of higher taxon performance: the correlation between species and higher taxon richness, the relative shapes and asymptotes of species and higher taxon accumulation curves, and the efficiency of higher taxa in a complementarity-based reserve-selection algorithm. In our model, higher taxon surrogates performed well in communities in which a few common species were most abundant, and less well in communities with many equally abundant species. Furthermore, higher taxon surrogates performed well when there was a small mean and variance in the number of species per higher taxa. We also show that empirically measured species-higher-taxon correlations can be partly spurious (i.e., a mathematical artifact), except when the species accumulation curve has reached an asymptote. This particular result is of considerable practical interest given the widespread use of rapid survey methods in biodiversity assessment and the application of higher taxon methods to taxa in which species accumulation curves rarely reach an asymptote, e.g., insects.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23967587     DOI: 10.1890/12-1167.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  6 in total

1.  Shortcuts in biodiversity research: What determines the performance of higher taxa as surrogates for species?

Authors:  Neil Rosser
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Ecological niche modelling does not support climatically-driven dinosaur diversity decline before the Cretaceous/Paleogene mass extinction.

Authors:  Alfio Alessandro Chiarenza; Philip D Mannion; Daniel J Lunt; Alex Farnsworth; Lewis A Jones; Sarah-Jane Kelland; Peter A Allison
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Does taxonomic and numerical resolution affect the assessment of invertebrate community structure in New World freshwater wetlands?

Authors:  Mateus M Pires; Marta G Grech; Cristina Stenert; Leonardo Maltchik; Luis B Epele; Kyle I McLean; Jamie M Kneitel; Douglas A Bell; Hamish S Greig; Chase R Gagne; Darold P Batzer
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.958

4.  Best Practicable Aggregation of Species: a step forward for species surrogacy in environmental assessment and monitoring.

Authors:  Stanislao Bevilacqua; Joachim Claudet; Antonio Terlizzi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Modelling the climatic niche of turtles: a deep-time perspective.

Authors:  Amy M Waterson; Daniela N Schmidt; Paul J Valdes; Patricia A Holroyd; David B Nicholson; Alexander Farnsworth; Paul M Barrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Large-scale differences in microbial biodiversity discovery between 16S amplicon and shotgun sequencing.

Authors:  Michael Tessler; Johannes S Neumann; Ebrahim Afshinnekoo; Michael Pineda; Rebecca Hersch; Luiz Felipe M Velho; Bianca T Segovia; Fabio A Lansac-Toha; Michael Lemke; Rob DeSalle; Christopher E Mason; Mercer R Brugler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.