Literature DB >> 23967572

The impact of nitrogen source and crop rotation on nitrogen mass balances in the Mississippi River Basin.

J Blesh1, L E Drinkwater.   

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) leaching to surface waters from grain farms in the Mississippi River Basin (MRB), USA, is the primary cause of hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. Regional-scale N mass balances indicate that a small, intensively cropped area of the upper MRB contributes disproportionately to nitrate loading. These aggregate balances miss small-scale variability, especially that caused by differences in farm management. We constructed N mass balances for a gradient of farm types, from corn-soybean monocultures to diversified grain farms that rely on biological N fixation (BNF) as a primary N source, to compare the relative efficiency of diverse farming systems in the MRB. Five-year N balances were calculated for a most and least productive field on each farm using data collected from interviews with 95 grain farmers in Iowa, Ohio, Minnesota, and Wisconsin; from legume biomass and corn grain samples collected from a subset of farms; and published values from the literature. Nitrogen balances ranged from high average annual surpluses (149 kg N x ha(-1) x yr(-1)) to large deficits (80 kg N x ha(-1) x yr(-1)), and differed based on N source and crop rotation. Fields with > 50% of total N additions from legume N sources and fields with complex crop rotations that included both annual and perennial species were approximately in balance (3.7 kg N x ha(-1) x yr(-1) and 5.7 kg N x ha(-1) x yr(-1), respectively) compared to fertilizer-based practices in corn-soybean rotations with average annual surpluses near 35 kg N x ha(-1) x yr(-1). Surplus N was also inversely related to the proportion of total N inputs from BNF for medium (80-160 kg N x ha(-1) x yr(-1)) to high (> 160 kg N x ha(-1) x yr(-1)) N rates. Diversified farmers were more likely to adjust their management practices in response to environmental variability compared to fertilizer-based farmers. Taken together, results from this study suggest that significantly reducing surplus N in agroecosystems will require reducing N inputs and increasing C availability to support the internal biological mechanisms for storing N in farm fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23967572     DOI: 10.1890/12-0132.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  6 in total

1.  Long-term decreases in phosphorus and suspended solids, but not nitrogen, in six upper Mississippi River tributaries, 1991-2014.

Authors:  Rebecca M Kreiling; Jeffrey N Houser
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Use of continuous monitoring to assess stream nitrate flux and transformation patterns.

Authors:  Christopher Jones; Sea-Won Kim; Keith Schilling
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Effectiveness of Conservation Crop Rotation for Water Pollutant Reduction from Agricultural Areas.

Authors:  Lydia Koropeckyj-Cox; Reid D Christianson; Yongping Yuan
Journal:  Trans ASABE       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.238

4.  Deciphering the role of SPL12 and AGL6 from a genetic module that functions in nodulation and root regeneration in Medicago sativa.

Authors:  Vida Nasrollahi; Ze-Chun Yuan; Qing Shi Mimmie Lu; Tim McDowell; Susanne E Kohalmi; Abdelali Hannoufa
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  The Nitrogen Balancing Act: Tracking the Environmental Performance of Food Production.

Authors:  Eileen L McLellan; Kenneth G Cassman; Alison J Eagle; Peter B Woodbury; Shai Sela; Christina Tonitto; Rebecca D Marjerison; Harold M van Es
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 8.589

6.  Long term effects of crop rotation and fertilization on crop yield stability in southeast China.

Authors:  Licheng Zhang; Jie Yuan; Mingqing Zhang; Yongchun Zhang; Limin Wang; Juan Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.