Literature DB >> 35950102

Effectiveness of Conservation Crop Rotation for Water Pollutant Reduction from Agricultural Areas.

Lydia Koropeckyj-Cox1, Reid D Christianson2, Yongping Yuan1.   

Abstract

Legumes included in corn-based crop rotation systems provide a variety of benefits to the subsequent crops and potentially to the environment. This review aims to synthesize available data from the literature on legume N credits and the effects of crop rotations on water quality, as well as to analyze the cost benefits associated with different legume-corn rotation systems. We found that there was much variation in reported values for legume N credits to subsequent corn crops, from both empirical results and recommendations made by U.S. land grant universities. But despite inherent complexity, accounting for this contribution is critical when estimating optimal N fertilizer application rates as part of nutrient management. Results from research on the influence of crop rotations on water quality show that including legumes in corn-based rotation systems generally decreases nitrate-N concentrations in subsurface drainage discharge. Our cost analysis showed that incorporating legumes in cropping systems reduced N fertilizer and pesticide costs compared to conventional cropping systems, i.e., continuous corn and corn-soybean rotations, but extended rotations, such as corn-soybean-alfalfa-alfalfa-alfalfa, are not as profitable as conventional systems in the U.S. Midwest. In comparing continuous corn and corn-soybean rotations, although their impacts on water quality are not significantly different when using overall means from the literature data, corn-soybean rotations are more profitable than continuous corn. When using data from papers that directly compared the two, we found that switching from continuous corn to corn-soybean can provide a benefit of $5 per kg N loss reduction. The cost analysis methods used could be tailored to any location or management scenario with appropriate inputs and serve as a useful tool for assessing cost benefits for other agricultural conservation practices. Legume-corn crop rotations have the potential to be an effective conservation practice with the ultimate goal of improving water quality, and, with further research, these rotations could be made even more effective by integrating them into a multi-practice system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conservation practice; Cost analysis; Crop rotation; Nitrate; Nutrient management; Water quality

Year:  2021        PMID: 35950102      PMCID: PMC9359213          DOI: 10.13031/trans.14017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans ASABE        ISSN: 2151-0032            Impact factor:   1.238


  16 in total

1.  Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: a meta-analysis of the adoption literature.

Authors:  Adam Baumgart-Getz; Linda Stalker Prokopy; Kristin Floress
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Sources of nitrate yields in the Mississippi River Basin.

Authors:  Mark B David; Laurie E Drinkwater; Gregory F McIsaac
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.751

3.  Nitrate leaching to shallow groundwater systems from agricultural fields with different management practices.

Authors:  P Nila Rekha; R S Kanwar; A K Nayak; C K Hoang; C H Pederson
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2011-07-25

Review 4.  Nitrate nitrogen in surface waters as influenced by climatic conditions and agricultural practices.

Authors:  G W Randall; D J Mulla
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.751

5.  Cover cropping to reduce nitrate loss through subsurface drainage in the northern U.S. corn belt.

Authors:  J S Strock; P M Porter; M P Russelle
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.751

6.  Where is the USA Corn Belt, and how is it changing?

Authors:  Timothy R Green; Holm Kipka; Olaf David; Gregory S McMaster
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Modeling Long-Term Corn Yield Response to Nitrogen Rate and Crop Rotation.

Authors:  Laila A Puntel; John E Sawyer; Daniel W Barker; Ranae Dietzel; Hanna Poffenbarger; Michael J Castellano; Kenneth J Moore; Peter Thorburn; Sotirios V Archontoulis
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Impacts of no-tillage management on nitrate loss from corn, soybean and wheat cultivation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefani Daryanto; Lixin Wang; Pierre-André Jacinthe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  A critical review of the impacts of cover crops on nitrogen leaching, net greenhouse gas balance and crop productivity.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdalla; Astley Hastings; Kun Cheng; Qian Yue; Dave Chadwick; Mikk Espenberg; Jaak Truu; Robert M Rees; Pete Smith
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 10.863

10.  Iowa stream nitrate and the Gulf of Mexico.

Authors:  Christopher S Jones; Jacob K Nielsen; Keith E Schilling; Larry J Weber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.