| Literature DB >> 23966990 |
Sasha G Tetu1, Daniel A Johnson, Deepa Varkey, Katherine Phillippy, Rhona K Stuart, Chris L Dupont, Karl A Hassan, Brian Palenik, Ian T Paulsen.
Abstract
Marine microorganisms, particularly those residing in coastal areas, may come in contact with any number of chemicals of environmental or xenobiotic origin. The sensitivity and response of marine cyanobacteria to such chemicals is, at present, poorly understood. We have looked at the transcriptional response of well characterized Synechococcus open ocean (WH8102) and coastal (CC9311) isolates to two DNA damaging agents, mitomycin C and ethidium bromide, using whole-genome expression microarrays. The coastal strain showed differential regulation of a larger proportion of its genome following "shock" treatment with each agent. Many of the orthologous genes in these strains, including those encoding sensor kinases, showed different transcriptional responses, with the CC9311 genes more likely to show significant changes in both treatments. While the overall response of each strain was considerably different, there were distinct transcriptional responses common to both strains observed for each DNA damaging agent, linked to the mode of action of each chemical. In both CC9311 and WH8102 there was evidence of SOS response induction under mitomycin C treatment, with genes recA, lexA and umuC significantly upregulated in this experiment but not under ethidium bromide treatment. Conversely, ethidium bromide treatment tended to result in upregulation of the DNA-directed RNA polymerase genes, not observed following mitomycin C treatment. Interestingly, a large number of genes residing on putative genomic island regions of each genome also showed significant upregulation under one or both chemical treatments.Entities:
Keywords: DNA damage; Synechococcus; cyanobacteria; ethidium bromide; microarray; mitomycin C; toxic stress; transcriptome
Year: 2013 PMID: 23966990 PMCID: PMC3744912 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00232
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure A1Growth of WH8102 and CC9311 on treatment with EB and MC at concentrations ranging from 0–4 and 0–1 μg/ml Growth of WH8102 on treatment with EB; (B) Growth of WH8102 on treatment with MC; (C) Growth of CC9311 on treatment with EB; (D) Growth of CC9311 on treatment with MC. The axes represent absorbance at 750 nm against time in hours. The experiment was conducted in triplicate and the mean plotted. The error bars represent standard deviation.
Numbers of genes in .
| WH8102 | 97 (317) | 77 (382) | 93 (236) | 80 (301) |
| CC9311 | 255 (786) | 228 (781) | 211 (715) | 226 (745) |
Total numbers of significantly affected genes are given in brackets.
Figure A2Photosynthetic efficiency of photosystem II in (A) WH8102 and (B) CC9311 on treatment with EB and MC, and with no treatment as determined using PAM fluorometry. The axes represent Fv/Fm (ratio of variable fluorescence and maximum fluorescence) against treatment time in hours. The experiment was carried out in triplicate and the mean plotted. The error bars represent standard deviation. The arrow represents the point of 2 h exposure at which RNA was isolated for microarray analysis.
Proportion of .
| Q | Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism | 36 | 21 | 14 | 36 | 17 | 0 | 13 | 17 |
| P | Inorganic ion transport and metabolism | 23 | 25 | 32 | 26 | 16 | 27 | 10 | 18 |
| I | Lipid metabolism | 34 | 34 | 18 | 28 | 7 | 13 | 9 | 13 |
| H | Coenzyme metabolism | 23 | 28 | 20 | 28 | 3 | 16 | 5 | 7 |
| F | Nucleotide transport and metabolism | 18 | 42 | 18 | 25 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| E | Amino acid transport and metabolism | 21 | 32 | 23 | 25 | 9 | 25 | 3 | 14 |
| G | Carbohydrate transport and metabolism | 13 | 30 | 19 | 31 | 7 | 20 | 9 | 14 |
| O | Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones | 37 | 18 | 32 | 17 | 10 | 32 | 10 | 9 |
| C | Energy production and conversion | 18 | 32 | 20 | 34 | 10 | 34 | 6 | 20 |
| U | Intracellular trafficking and secretion | 25 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 12 | 24 | 12 | 0 |
| N | Cell motility and secretion | 8 | 15 | 31 | 31 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
| M | Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis | 27 | 20 | 27 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 9 | 7 |
| T | Signal transduction mechanisms | 25 | 40 | 22 | 36 | 17 | 14 | 10 | 17 |
| D | Cell division and chromosome partitioning | 16 | 47 | 16 | 47 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| L | DNA replication, recombination and repair | 36 | 20 | 34 | 13 | 15 | 7 | 15 | 1 |
| K | Transcription | 33 | 25 | 21 | 25 | 15 | 13 | 6 | 13 |
| J | Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis | 24 | 21 | 16 | 37 | 9 | 17 | 5 | 19 |
| V | Defense mechanisms | 41 | 34 | 31 | 25 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 3 |
| R | General function prediction only | 27 | 21 | 31 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 6 |
| S | Function unknown | 26 | 32 | 26 | 23 | 9 | 12 | 4 | 8 |
| Not in COG | 28 | 27 | 25 | 27 | 18 | 11 | 13 | 14 | |
Figure 1Circular figures showing chromosomes of Outermost two circles indicate positions of CDSs in plus (circle 1) and minus (circle 2) strands colored by functional category: translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis (pink); transcription (orange); DNA replication, recombination and repair (fuchsia); cell division and chromosome partitioning (yellow); posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones (brown); cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis (olive); cell motility and secretion (dark green); inorganic ion transport and metabolism (green); signal transduction mechanisms (blue/green); energy production and conversion (aqua); carbohydrate transport and metabolism (blue); amino acid transport and metabolism (teal); nucleotide transport and metabolism (turquoise); coenzyme metabolism (dark blue); lipid metabolism (lavender); secondary-metabolite biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism (purple); general function prediction only (light gray); function unknown (dark gray); and no COG (gray black). Genes whose expression was upregulated by more than 2 fold in microarray experiments when exposed to EB are indicated by green bars in the third circle, while those similarly upregulated by MC are indicted by pink bars in the fourth circle. Moving toward the center, the next circle map pairwise blastn alignments (expected threshold = 1e-20) between CC9311 and WH8102. Circle six shows G + C content (deviation from average), and the seventh circle illustrates G + C skew in green (+) and purple (−). The scale (in Kbp) is indicated on the innermost circle. Genes of particular interest are circled and described.
List of .
Genes which responded significantly, but in the opposite direction, are highlighted in gray.
Transcriptional response of sensor kinases to toxic shock treatments in .
| sync_0675 | 1.32 (±0.26) | 1.4 (±0.37) | |||
| sync_1079 | 0.36 (±0.22) | 0.7 (±0.43) | |||
| sync_0573 | −1.32 (±0.25) | −0.95 (±0.40) | |||
| sync_2219 | 0.46 (±0.19) | NS | SYNW0551 | NS | −0.59 (±0.16) |
| sync_1006 | −0.7 (±0.18) | −0.9 (±0.65) | SYNW0753 | NS | −0.35 (±0.18) |
| sync_0706 | −0.25 (±0.09) | NS | |||
| sync_1133 | NS | 0.81 (±0.43) | |||
| sync_0668 | 0.61 (±0.16) | NS | |||
| sync_0263 | −0.5 (±0.23) | −0.92 (±0.44) | |||
| sync_0286 | NS | 1.37 (±0.40) | SYNW0246 | NS | NS |
| sync_1233 | NS | NS | SYNW0807 | NS | NS |
| SYNW0948 | −0.15 (±0.06) | NS |
SYNW0948 is involved in phosphate sensing and has no CC9311 homolog.
Transcriptional response of .
Dark grey shading indicates instances where gene transcript levels were not significantly different between the control and test conditions. Light grey shading indicates gene transcript levels observed to be significantly reduced in the test condition compared to the control values.
Figure 2Hierarchical trees showing clusters of The expression levels for this strain under eight different stress conditions: early and late phosphate stress (Tetu et al., 2009), EB and MC shock (this study), moderate and high copper shock (pCu11; pCU10) (Stuart et al., 2009) and Nickel (Ni) deprivation in cultures growing on NH4+ and urea (Dupont et al., 2012) were compared. For each set of experiments data from two independent biological replicates was used. The color bar indicates the log2 ratio.