Literature DB >> 23966643

Sexual selection explains more functional variation in the mammalian major histocompatibility complex than parasitism.

J C Winternitz1, S G Minchey, L Z Garamszegi, S Huang, P R Stephens, S Altizer.   

Abstract

Understanding drivers of genetic diversity at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is vitally important for predicting how vertebrate immune defence might respond to future selection pressures and for preserving immunogenetic diversity in declining populations. Parasite-mediated selection is believed to be the major selective force generating MHC polymorphism, and while MHC-based mating preferences also exist for multiple species including humans, the general importance of mate choice is debated. To investigate the contributions of parasitism and sexual selection in explaining among-species variation in MHC diversity, we applied comparative methods and meta-analysis across 112 mammal species, including carnivores, bats, primates, rodents and ungulates. We tested whether MHC diversity increased with parasite richness and relative testes size (as an indicator of the potential for mate choice), while controlling for phylogenetic autocorrelation, neutral mutation rate and confounding ecological variables. We found that MHC nucleotide diversity increased with parasite richness for bats and ungulates but decreased with parasite richness for carnivores. By contrast, nucleotide diversity increased with relative testes size for all taxa. This study provides support for both parasite-mediated and sexual selection in shaping functional MHC polymorphism across mammals, and importantly, suggests that sexual selection could have a more general role than previously thought.

Entities:  

Keywords:  major histocompatibility complex; mate choice; meta-analysis; parasite richness; parasite-mediated selection; phylogenetic comparative methods

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23966643      PMCID: PMC3768310          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  49 in total

1.  Promiscuity and the primate immune system.

Authors:  C L Nunn; J L Gittleman; J Antonovics
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-11-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review.

Authors:  T Tregenza; N Wedell
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  High MHC diversity maintained by balancing selection in an otherwise genetically monomorphic mammal.

Authors:  Andres Aguilar; Gary Roemer; Sally Debenham; Matthew Binns; David Garcelon; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Genetic similarity, breeding distribution range and sexual selection.

Authors:  A P Møller; L Z Garamszegi; C N Spottiswoode
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 5.  Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.

Authors:  Shinichi Nakagawa; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2007-11

6.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Three-dimensional structure of the human class II histocompatibility antigen HLA-DR1.

Authors:  J H Brown; T S Jardetzky; J C Gorga; L J Stern; R G Urban; J L Strominger; D C Wiley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-07-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Major histocompatibility complex diversity in the endangered Ethiopian wolf (Canis simensis).

Authors:  L J Kennedy; D A Randall; D Knobel; J J Brown; A R Fooks; K Argaw; F Shiferaw; W E R Ollier; C Sillero-Zubiri; D W Macdonald; M K Laurenson
Journal:  Tissue Antigens       Date:  2011-02

9.  Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity?

Authors:  C Wedekind; S Füri
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Evolutionary conservation and selection of human disease gene orthologs in the rat and mouse genomes.

Authors:  Hui Huang; Eitan E Winter; Huajun Wang; Keith G Weinstock; Heming Xing; Leo Goodstadt; Peter D Stenson; David N Cooper; Douglas Smith; M Mar Albà; Chris P Ponting; Kim Fechtel
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2004-06-28       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  25 in total

1.  The best smellers make the best choosers: mate choice is affected by female chemosensory receptor gene diversity in a mammal.

Authors:  Pablo S C Santos; Maja Mezger; Miriam Kolar; Frank-Uwe Michler; Simone Sommer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Multiplicative fitness, rapid haplotype discovery, and fitness decay explain evolution of human MHC.

Authors:  Alexander E Lobkovsky; Lee Levi; Yuri I Wolf; Martin Maiers; Loren Gragert; Idan Alter; Yoram Louzoun; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sexual selection and the evolutionary dynamics of the major histocompatibility complex.

Authors:  Maciej Jan Ejsmond; Jacek Radwan; Anthony B Wilson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Avian major histocompatibility complex copy number variation is associated with helminth richness.

Authors:  Piotr Minias; Jorge S Gutiérrez; Peter O Dunn
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Immunogenetic novelty confers a selective advantage in host-pathogen coevolution.

Authors:  Karl P Phillips; Joanne Cable; Ryan S Mohammed; Magdalena Herdegen-Radwan; Jarosław Raubic; Karolina J Przesmycka; Cock van Oosterhout; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Mating preferences can drive expansion or contraction of major histocompatibility complex gene family.

Authors:  Piotr Bentkowski; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Diversity and selection of MHC class I genes in the vulnerable Chinese egret (Egretta eulophotes).

Authors:  Zeng Wang; Xiaoping Zhou; Qingxian Lin; Wenzhen Fang; Xiaolin Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Egernia stokesii (gidgee skink) MHC I positively selected sites lack concordance with HLA peptide binding regions.

Authors:  Sarah K Pearson; C Michael Bull; Michael G Gardner
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.846

9.  Within-trio tests provide little support for post-copulatory selection on major histocompatibility complex haplotypes in a free-living population.

Authors:  W Huang; J M Pemberton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  MHC class II variation in a rare and ecological specialist mouse lemur reveals lower allelic richness and contrasting selection patterns compared to a generalist and widespread sympatric congener.

Authors:  Eva Pechouskova; Melanie Dammhahn; Markus Brameier; Claudia Fichtel; Peter M Kappeler; Elise Huchard
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 2.846

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.