Literature DB >> 18021201

Genetic similarity, breeding distribution range and sexual selection.

A P Møller1, L Z Garamszegi1, C N Spottiswoode1.   

Abstract

Large populations with extensive breeding distributions may sustain greater genetic variability, thus producing a positive relationship between genetic variation and population size. Levels of genetic variability may also be affected by sexual selection, which could either reduce levels because a small fraction of males contribute to the following generation, or augment them by generating genetic variability through elevated rates of mutations. We investigated to what extent genetic variability, as estimated from band sharing coefficients for minisatellite markers, could be predicted by breeding distribution range, population size and intensity of sexual selection (as reflected by degree of polygyny and extra-pair paternity). Across a sample of 62 species of birds in the Western Palearctic, we found extensive interspecific variation in band sharing coefficients. High band sharing coefficients (implying low local genetic variability among individuals) were associated with restricted breeding distributions, a conclusion confirmed by analysis of statistically independent linear contrasts. Independently, species with large population sizes had small band sharing coefficients. Furthermore, bird species with a high richness of subspecies for their breeding distribution range had higher band sharing coefficients. Finally, bird species with high levels of polygyny and extra-pair paternity had small band sharing coefficients. These results suggest that breeding distribution range, population size and intensity of sexual selection are important predictors of levels of genetic variability in extant populations.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18021201     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01450.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  6 in total

1.  Ectoparasites, uropygial glands and hatching success in birds.

Authors:  Anders Pape Møller; Johannes Erritzøe; Lajos Rózsa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Populations of migratory bird species that did not show a phenological response to climate change are declining.

Authors:  Anders Pape Møller; Diego Rubolini; Esa Lehikoinen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sexual selection explains more functional variation in the mammalian major histocompatibility complex than parasitism.

Authors:  J C Winternitz; S G Minchey; L Z Garamszegi; S Huang; P R Stephens; S Altizer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Spatiotemporal variation in avian migration phenology: citizen science reveals effects of climate change.

Authors:  Allen H Hurlbert; Zhongfei Liang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Duplication and population dynamics shape historic patterns of selection and genetic variation at the major histocompatibility complex in rodents.

Authors:  Jamie C Winternitz; John P Wares
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Temporal variation in population size of European bird species: effects of latitude and marginality of distribution.

Authors:  José J Cuervo; Anders P Møller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.