OBJECTIVES: Increasing coverage of quality reproductive health services, including prevention of mother-to-child transmission services, requires understanding where and how these services are provided. To inform scale-up, we conducted a population-based survey in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. METHODS: Stratified two-stage cluster sampling was used to select women ≥18 years old who had been pregnant within the prior three years. Participants were interviewed about their reproductive healthcare utilization and impressions of services received. RESULTS: We interviewed 1221 women, 98% of whom sought antenatal care (ANC). 78% of women began ANC after the first trimester and 22% reported <4 visits. Reasons for choosing an ANC facility included reputation (51%), friendly/accessible staff (39%), availability of comprehensive services (29%), medication access (26%), location (26%), and cost (21%). Most women reported satisfactory treatment by staff, but 47% reported that the ANC provider ignored their complaints, 23% had difficulty understanding responses to their questions, 22% wanted more time with the provider, 21% wanted more privacy, and 12% felt uncomfortable asking questions. Only 56% reported someone talked to them about HIV/AIDS. Strongest predictors of seeking inadequate ANC included low participant and partner education and lack of certain assets. Only 32% of women sought postnatal care. Some results varied by health zone. CONCLUSIONS: Scaling-up interventions to improve reproductive health services should include broad-based health systems strengthening and promote equitable access to quality ANC, delivery, and postnatal services. Personal and structural-level barriers to seeking ANC need to be addressed, with consideration given to local contexts.
OBJECTIVES: Increasing coverage of quality reproductive health services, including prevention of mother-to-child transmission services, requires understanding where and how these services are provided. To inform scale-up, we conducted a population-based survey in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. METHODS: Stratified two-stage cluster sampling was used to select women ≥18 years old who had been pregnant within the prior three years. Participants were interviewed about their reproductive healthcare utilization and impressions of services received. RESULTS: We interviewed 1221 women, 98% of whom sought antenatal care (ANC). 78% of women began ANC after the first trimester and 22% reported <4 visits. Reasons for choosing an ANC facility included reputation (51%), friendly/accessible staff (39%), availability of comprehensive services (29%), medication access (26%), location (26%), and cost (21%). Most women reported satisfactory treatment by staff, but 47% reported that the ANC provider ignored their complaints, 23% had difficulty understanding responses to their questions, 22% wanted more time with the provider, 21% wanted more privacy, and 12% felt uncomfortable asking questions. Only 56% reported someone talked to them about HIV/AIDS. Strongest predictors of seeking inadequate ANC included low participant and partner education and lack of certain assets. Only 32% of women sought postnatal care. Some results varied by health zone. CONCLUSIONS: Scaling-up interventions to improve reproductive health services should include broad-based health systems strengthening and promote equitable access to quality ANC, delivery, and postnatal services. Personal and structural-level barriers to seeking ANC need to be addressed, with consideration given to local contexts.
Keywords:
Democratic Republic of Congo; antenatal care; household survey; implementation research; maternal and child health; prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV
Authors: Henry V Doctor; Sally E Findley; Alastair Ager; Giorgio Cometto; Godwin Y Afenyadu; Fatima Adamu; Cathy Green Journal: Reprod Health Matters Date: 2012-06
Authors: Margaret C Hogan; Kyle J Foreman; Mohsen Naghavi; Stephanie Y Ahn; Mengru Wang; Susanna M Makela; Alan D Lopez; Rafael Lozano; Christopher J L Murray Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-04-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Audrey E Pettifor; Brooke A Levandowski; Catherine MacPhail; Nancy S Padian; Myron S Cohen; Helen V Rees Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2008-07-09 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Norma C Ware; Monique A Wyatt; Elvin H Geng; Sylvia F Kaaya; Oche O Agbaji; Winnie R Muyindike; Guerino Chalamilla; Patricia A Agaba Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2013-01-08 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Scott E Kellerman; Saeed Ahmed; Theresa Feeley-Summerl; Jonathan Jay; Maria Kim; B Ryan Phelps; Nandita Sugandhi; Erik Schouten; Mike Tolle; Fatima Tsiouris Journal: AIDS Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Richard Mangwi Ayiasi; Lynn Muhimbuura Atuyambe; Juliet Kiguli; Christopher Garimoi Orach; Patrick Kolsteren; Bart Criel Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Irene Marete; Constance Tenge; Carolyne Chemweno; Sherri Bucher; Omrana Pasha; Umesh Y Ramadurg; Shivanand C Mastiholi; Melody Chiwila; Archana Patel; Fernando Althabe; Ana Garces; Janet L Moore; Edward A Liechty; Richard J Derman; Patricia L Hibberd; K Hambidge; Robert L Goldenberg; Waldemar A Carlo; Marion Koso-Thomas; Elizabeth M McClure; Fabian Esamai Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 3.223
Authors: Richard Mangwi Ayiasi; Alice Jean Ochola Mangwi; Ruth Young; Christopher Garimoi Orach; Rosemary Morgan Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 1.817