Literature DB >> 14595310

Propofol for endoscopic sedation: A protocol for safe and effective administration by the gastroenterologist.

Lawrence B Cohen1, Amelia N Dubovsky, James Aisenberg, Kenneth M Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in the use of propofol, an ultrashort-acting hypnotic agent, for sedation during endoscopic examinations. A protocol was developed for administration of propofol, combined with small doses of midazolam and meperidine, for endoscopic sedation under the direction of a gastroenterologist. Initial experience with using this protocol is described.
METHODS: A total of 819 consecutive endoscopic examinations under sedation with propofol, midazolam, and meperidine (or fentanyl), in adherence with the sedation protocol, were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS: There were 638 colonoscopies and 181 EGDs; 89% of patients were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II. Mean dosages of medications were: propofol 63 (33.5) mg, meperidine 48 (7.2) mg, and midazolam 1 (0.12) mg. The dose of propofol was inversely correlated with age and ASA class, and positively correlated with patient weight and duration of examination. Hypotension (>20 mm Hg decline in either systolic or diastolic blood pressure) developed in 218 (27%) patients, and hypoxemia (oxygen saturation <90%) developed in 75 (9%). All episodes of hypotension and hypoxemia were transient, and no patient required administration of a pharmacologic antagonist or assisted ventilation. The average time for recovery after colonoscopy and after EGD was, respectively, 25 minutes and 28 minutes. All EGDs and 98% of colonoscopies were completed successfully.
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this initial experience, it is believed that propofol, potentiated by small doses of midazolam and meperidine, can be safely and effectively administered under the direction of a gastroenterologist. Additional research will be necessary to determine whether propofol is superior to the current methods of sedation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14595310     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02010-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  38 in total

1.  Does anesthesiologist-directed sedation for ERCP improve deep cannulation and complication rates?

Authors:  Paresh P Mehta; John J Vargo; John A Dumot; Mansour A Parsi; Rocio Lopez; Gregory Zuccaro
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Balanced propofol sedation administered by nonanesthesiologists: The first Italian experience.

Authors:  Alessandro Repici; Nico Pagano; Cesare Hassan; Alessandra Carlino; Giacomo Rando; Giuseppe Strangio; Fabio Romeo; Angelo Zullo; Elisa Ferrara; Eva Vitetta; Daniel de Paula Pessoa Ferreira; Silvio Danese; Massimo Arosio; Alberto Malesci
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Nurse-administered propofol sedation for upper endoscopic ultrasonography: not yet ready for prime time.

Authors:  Lawrence B Cohen
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-12-17

4.  Nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol versus midazolam and propofol, titrated to moderate sedation, for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Javier Molina-Infante; Carmen Dueñas-Sadornil; Jose M Mateos-Rodriguez; Belen Perez-Gallardo; Gema Vinagre-Rodríguez; Moises Hernandez-Alonso; Miguel Fernandez-Bermejo; Ferran Gonzalez-Huix
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Endoscopist-directed propofol: pros and cons.

Authors:  Eun Hye Kim; Sang Kil Lee
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2014-03-31

Review 6.  How best to approach endoscopic sedation?

Authors:  Michaela Müller; Till Wehrmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Single use of fentanyl in colonoscopy is safe and effective and significantly shortens recovery time.

Authors:  G Lazaraki; J Kountouras; S Metallidis; S Dokas; T Bakaloudis; D Chatzopoulos; E Gavalas; C Zavos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Remifentanil compared with midazolam and pethidine sedation during colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Maria M Manolaraki; Angeliki Theodoropoulou; Charalampos Stroumpos; Emmanouil Vardas; Pantelis Oustamanolakis; Aliki Gritzali; Gregorios Chlouverakis; Gregorios A Paspatis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Pediatric sedation: a global challenge.

Authors:  David Gozal; Keira P Mason
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2010-10-19

10.  Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) sedation: clinical utility of fospropofol.

Authors:  Eric A Harris; David A Lubarsky; Keith A Candiotti
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.