Literature DB >> 23964145

Diagnostic accuracy of a new point-of-care screening assay for celiac disease.

Faiza Benkebil1, Christophe Combescure, Silvia I Anghel, Cécile Besson Duvanel, Michela G Schäppi.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of a new point-of-care assay detecting anti-deamidated gliadin peptides in celiac disease (CD) patients.
METHODS: One-hundred-and-twelve patients (age range: 1.8-79.2 years old) with clinical symptoms suggestive of CD and/or first-degree relatives (FDR) of CD patients (n = 66), and confirmed CD on a gluten-free diet (GFD) (n = 46), were prospectively enrolled in the study at Gastroenterology outpatient clinics for adult patients and from the Gastroenterology Consultation Ward at the Pediatric Department of the University Hospital of Geneva. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects enrolled. The study received approval from the local ethics committee. The original CD diagnosis had been based on serum-positive IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (QuantaLite™, Inova Diagnostics, San Diego, CA, United States) and on biopsy results. Serum samples from all study participants were tested by the new CD lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (CD-LFIA) device, Simtomax® Blood Drop (Augurix SA, BioArk, Monthey, Switzerland) to detect immunoglobulin (Ig)A and IgG antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptides. The diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves with 95%CIs. A cut-off of 2 on the Rann colorimetric scale was used to calculate the device's sensitivity and specificity.
RESULTS: CD-LFIA was highly accurate in detecting untreated celiac patients. In the group of patients with CD symptoms and/or FDR, eight new cases of CD were detected by ELISA and biopsy. All of these new cases were also correctly identified by CD-LFIA. The test yielded four false positive and four false negative results. The false positive results were all within the groups with clinical symptoms suggestive of CD and/or FDR, whereas the false negative results were all within the GFD group. The test yeld a sensitivity of 78.9% (95%CI: 54.4-93.9) and specificity of 95.7% (95%CI: 89.4-98.8), and the area under the curve reached 0.893 (95%CI: 0.798-0.988). The Kappa coefficient, calculated according to the values obtained by two readers from the same device, was of 0.96 (SE: 0.06). When the GFD patients were excluded from the analysis, the area under the curve reached 0.989 (95%CI: 0.971-1.000) and the Kappa coefficient, calculated according to the values obtained by two readers from the same device, became 0.96 (SE: 0.07). Furthermore, using the Rann scale cut-off of 2 without the GFD patients, sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 93.1% (95%CI: 83.3-98.1).
CONCLUSION: The new CD-LFIA rapid screening test shows good diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, and may rule out CD in patients with CD-related symptoms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Celiac disease; Deamidated gliadin; Point-of-care assay; Screening; Total immunoglobulin A

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23964145      PMCID: PMC3746383          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i31.5111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  27 in total

Review 1.  The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists.

Authors:  G Oberhuber; G Granditsch; H Vogelsang
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.566

2.  Antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptides identify adult coeliac disease patients negative for antibodies against endomysium and tissue transglutaminase.

Authors:  C Dahle; A Hagman; S Ignatova; M Ström
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 3.  Coeliac disease--a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

Authors:  Katri Kaukinen; Katri Lindfors; Pekka Collin; Outi Koskinen; Markku Mäki
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of coeliac serological tests: a prospective study.

Authors:  Glenn E M Reeves; Marline L Squance; Anne E Duggan; Rajathurai R Murugasu; Robert J Wilson; Richard C Wong; Robert A Gibson; Richard H Steele; Wendy K Pollock
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.566

5.  Natural history of antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides and transglutaminase in early childhood celiac disease.

Authors:  Edwin Liu; Marcella Li; Lisa Emery; Iman Taki; Kathy Barriga; Claudio Tiberti; George S Eisenbarth; Marian J Rewers; Edward J Hoffenberg
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 6.  Recent advances in coeliac disease.

Authors:  Matthew J Armstrong; Gerry G Robins; Peter D Howdle
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.287

7.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers.

Authors:  Rajeev Kumar; Abhaya Indrayan
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.411

8.  Identification of tissue transglutaminase as the autoantigen of celiac disease.

Authors:  W Dieterich; T Ehnis; M Bauer; P Donner; U Volta; E O Riecken; D Schuppan
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 9.  Accuracy of diagnostic antibody tests for coeliac disease in children: summary of an evidence report.

Authors:  Klaus Giersiepen; Monika Lelgemann; Nina Stuhldreher; Luca Ronfani; Steffen Husby; Sibylle Koletzko; Ilma R Korponay-Szabó
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.839

10.  Looking for celiac disease: diagnostic accuracy of two rapid commercial assays.

Authors:  Gregor Nemec; Alessandro Ventura; Martelossi Stefano; Grazia Di Leo; Valentina Baldas; Alberto Tommasini; Fortunato Ferrara; Andrea Taddio; Angelo Città; Daniele Sblattero; Roberto Marzari; Tarcisio Not
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Celiac disease: from etiological factors to evolving diagnostic approaches.

Authors:  Anantdeep Kaur; Olga Shimoni; Michael Wallach
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 2.  Risk of Celiac Disease in the First- and Second-Degree Relatives of Patients With Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Prashant Singh; Shubhangi Arora; Suman Lal; Tor A Strand; Govind K Makharia
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Integrating Cell Phone Imaging with Magnetic Levitation (i-LEV) for Label-Free Blood Analysis at the Point-of-Living.

Authors:  Murat Baday; Semih Calamak; Naside Gozde Durmus; Ronald W Davis; Lars M Steinmetz; Utkan Demirci
Journal:  Small       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 13.281

4.  The Role of an IgA/IgG-Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Point-of-Care Test in Predicting Persistent Villous Atrophy in Patients With Celiac Disease on a Gluten-Free Diet.

Authors:  Michelle S Lau; Peter D Mooney; William L White; Michael A Rees; Simon H Wong; Matthew Kurien; Nick Trott; Daniel A Leffler; Marios Hadjivassiliou; David S Sanders
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Diagnostic Accuracy of a Point-of-Care Test for Celiac Disease Antibody Screening among Infertile Patients.

Authors:  Louise Grode; Thomas Møller Jensen; Tina Parkner; Inge Errebo Agerholm; Peter Humaidan; Bodil Hammer Bech; Cecilia Ramlau-Hansen
Journal:  Inflamm Intest Dis       Date:  2019-07-23

6.  A point-of-care test for facing the burden of undiagnosed celiac disease in the Mediterranean area: a pragmatic design study.

Authors:  Stefano Costa; Luca Astarita; Mongi Ben-Hariz; Giovanni Currò; Jernej Dolinsek; Aydan Kansu; Giuseppe Magazzu'; Stefania Marvaso; Dusanka Micetic-Turku; Salvatore Pellegrino; Giuseppe Primavera; Pasqualino Rossi; Andrea Smarrazzo; Francesca Tucci; Carmela Arcidiaco; Luigi Greco
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Early diagnosis of celiac disease in IgA deficient children: contribution of a point-of-care test.

Authors:  Francoise Bienvenu; Silvia I Anghel; Cécile Besson Duvanel; Julien Guillemaud; Lorna Garnier; Florian Renosi; Alain Lachaux; Jacques Bienvenu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Differentiating coeliac disease from irritable bowel syndrome by urinary volatile organic compound analysis--a pilot study.

Authors:  Ramesh P Arasaradnam; Eric Westenbrink; Michael J McFarlane; Ruth Harbord; Samantha Chambers; Nicola O'Connell; Catherine Bailey; Chuka U Nwokolo; Karna D Bardhan; Richard Savage; James A Covington
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Celiac Disease: Diagnostic Standards and Dilemmas.

Authors:  Dharmesh H Kaswala; Gopal Veeraraghavan; Ciaran P Kelly; Daniel A Leffler
Journal:  Diseases       Date:  2015-06-16

10.  'Pre-endoscopy point of care test (Simtomax- IgA/IgG-Deamidated Gliadin Peptide) for coeliac disease in iron deficiency anaemia: diagnostic accuracy and a cost saving economic model'.

Authors:  Michelle Shui Yee Lau; Peter Mooney; William White; Victoria Appleby; Sulleman Moreea; Ismail Haythem; Joshua Elias; Kiran Bundhoo; Gareth Corbett; Liam Wong; Her Hsin Tsai; Simon Cross; John Hebden; Sami Hoque; David Sanders
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.