Literature DB >> 23963884

Improved accuracy with 3D planning and patient-specific instruments during simulated pelvic bone tumor surgery.

Olivier Cartiaux1, Laurent Paul, Bernard G Francq, Xavier Banse, Pierre-Louis Docquier.   

Abstract

In orthopaedic surgery, resection of pelvic bone tumors can be inaccurate due to complex geometry, limited visibility and restricted working space of the pelvis. The present study investigated accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for bone-cutting during simulated tumor surgery within the pelvis. A synthetic pelvic bone model was imaged using a CT-scanner. The set of images was reconstructed in 3D and resection of a simulated periacetabular tumor was defined with four target planes (ischium, pubis, anterior ilium, and posterior ilium) with a 10-mm desired safe margin. Patient-specific instruments for bone-cutting were designed and manufactured using rapid-prototyping technology. Twenty-four surgeons (10 senior and 14 junior) were asked to perform tumor resection. After cutting, ISO1101 location and flatness parameters, achieved surgical margins and the time were measured. With PSI, the location accuracy of the cut planes with respect to the target planes averaged 1 and 1.2 mm in the anterior and posterior ilium, 2 mm in the pubis and 3.7 mm in the ischium (p < 0.0001). Results in terms of the location of the cut planes and the achieved surgical margins did not reveal any significant difference between senior and junior surgeons (p = 0.2214 and 0.8449, respectively). The maximum differences between the achieved margins and the 10-mm desired safe margin were found in the pubis (3.1 and 5.1 mm for senior and junior surgeons respectively). Of the 24 simulated resection, there was no intralesional tumor cutting. This study demonstrates that using PSI technology during simulated bone cuts of the pelvis can provide good cutting accuracy. Compared to a previous report on computer assistance for pelvic bone cutting, PSI technology clearly demonstrates an equivalent value-added for bone cutting accuracy than navigation technology. When in vivo validated, PSI technology may improve pelvic bone tumor surgery by providing clinically acceptable margins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23963884     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-013-0890-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  35 in total

Review 1.  "Advances in the surgical management of bone tumors".

Authors:  Justin E Bird
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Orthopaedic tumors: What problems are we solving, and are universities and major medical centers doing enough?

Authors:  Mohamed Mediouni; Daniel R Schlatterer
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-05-04

3.  Development and initial porcine and cadaver experience with three-dimensional printing of endoscopic and laparoscopic equipment.

Authors:  Michael del Junco; Zhamshid Okhunov; Renai Yoon; Ramtin Khanipour; Samuel Juncal; Garen Abedi; Achim Lusch; Jaime Landman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Different Digitalization Techniques for 3D Printing of Anatomical Pieces.

Authors:  M T Ugidos Lozano; F Blaya Haro; Alessandro Ruggiero; S Manzoor; S Nuere Menendez-Pidal; J A Juanes Méndez
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Patient-specific instrument can achieve same accuracy with less resection time than navigation assistance in periacetabular pelvic tumor surgery: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Kwok-Chuen Wong; Kwan-Yik Sze; Irene Oi-Ling Wong; Chung-Ming Wong; Shekhar-Madhukar Kumta
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  [Three-dimensional reconstruction of human kidney based on UroMedix-3D system and its application in kidney surgery].

Authors:  Jianfeng Huang; Shidong Lü; Zhengfei Hu; Chantao Huang; Yiwen Li; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-05-30

Review 7.  Surgical Treatment of Bone Sarcoma.

Authors:  Felix Bläsius; Heide Delbrück; Frank Hildebrand; Ulf Krister Hofmann
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 8.  Publication trends and knowledge mapping in 3D printing in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Mohit Kumar Patralekh; Abhishek Vaish; Amit Kumar Agarwal; Vipul Vijay
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-07-30

9.  [Three dimensional nephrometry system for partial nephrectomy: Our initial exploration].

Authors:  X F Li; Y J Peng; X T Yu; S W Xiong; S D Cheng; G P Ding; K L Yang; Q Tang; Y Mi; J Y Wu; P Zhang; J X Xie; H Hao; H Wang; J X Qiu; J Yang; X S Li; L Q Zhou
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-06-18

10.  Affordable Three-Dimensional Printed Heart Models.

Authors:  Gorka Gómez-Ciriza; Tomás Gómez-Cía; José Antonio Rivas-González; Mari Nieves Velasco Forte; Israel Valverde
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.