Literature DB >> 23962515

Evaluation of new technologies for cancer control based on population trends in disease incidence and mortality.

Ruth Etzioni1, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar.   

Abstract

Cancer interventions often disseminate in the population before evidence of their effectiveness is available. Population disease trends provide a natural experiment for assessing the characteristics of the disease and the potential impact of the intervention. We review models for extracting information from population data for use in economic evaluations of cancer screening interventions. We focus particularly on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer and describe approaches that can be used to project the likely costs and benefits of competing screening policies. Results indicate that the lifetime probability of biopsy-detectable prostate cancer is 33%, the chance of clinical diagnosis without screening is 13%, and the average time from onset to clinical diagnosis is 14 years. Less aggressive screening policies that screen less often and use more conservative criteria (e.g., higher PSA thresholds) for biopsy referral may dramatically reduce PSA screening costs with modest impact on benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23962515      PMCID: PMC3748002          DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  28 in total

1.  Calibrating disease progression models using population data: a critical precursor to policy development in cancer control.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Lurdes Inoue; Jeffrey Katcher; William Hazelton; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Changes in risk factors and increases in screening contribute to the decline in colorectal cancer mortality, 1975 to 2000.

Authors:  Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Estimating lead time and overdiagnosis associated with PSA screening from prostate cancer incidence trends.

Authors:  Donatello Telesca; Ruth Etzioni; Roman Gulati
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing patterns in the recent prostate cancer incidence decline in the United States.

Authors:  J M Legler; E J Feuer; A L Potosky; R M Merrill; B S Kramer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Saundra S Buys; David Chia; Timothy R Church; Mona N Fouad; Edward P Gelmann; Paul A Kvale; Douglas J Reding; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Barbara O'Brien; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Richard B Hayes; Barnett S Kramer; Grant Izmirlian; Anthony B Miller; Paul F Pinsky; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer incidence trends.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; David F Penson; Julie M Legler; Dante di Tommaso; Rob Boer; Peter H Gann; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-07-03       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Amy B Knudsen; Janneke Wilschut; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Prostate-specific antigen as predictor of prostate cancer in black men and white men.

Authors:  A S Whittemore; C Lele; G D Friedman; T Stamey; J H Vogelman; N Orentreich
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Cost analysis of screening for, diagnosing, and staging prostate cancer based on a systematic review of published studies.

Authors:  Donatus U Ekwueme; Leonardo A Stroud; Yanjing Chen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  4 in total

1.  Advancing comparative studies of patterns of care and economic outcomes in cancer: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Silvia Francisci; Angela Mariotto; Maura Mezzetti; Anna Gigli; Joseph Lipscomb
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013

2.  Comparing cancer care, outcomes, and costs across health systems: charting the course.

Authors:  Joseph Lipscomb; K Robin Yabroff; Mark C Hornbrook; Anna Gigli; Silvia Francisci; Murray Krahn; Gemma Gatta; Annalisa Trama; Debra P Ritzwoller; Isabelle Durand-Zaleski; Ramzi Salloum; Neetu Chawla; Catia Angiolini; Emanuele Crocetti; Francesco Giusti; Stefano Guzzinati; Maura Mezzetti; Guido Miccinesi; Angela Mariotto
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013

3.  Association between baseline serum glucose, triglycerides and total cholesterol, and prostate cancer risk categories.

Authors:  Rhonda Arthur; Henrik Møller; Hans Garmo; Lars Holmberg; Pår Stattin; Håkan Malmstrom; Mats Lambe; Niklas Hammar; Göran Walldius; David Robinson; Ingmar Jungner; Mieke Van Hemelrijck
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Trends in UK regional cancer mortality 1991-2007.

Authors:  Dominic C Marshall; Thomas E Webb; Richard A Hall; Justin D Salciccioli; Raghib Ali; Mahiben Maruthappu
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.