Literature DB >> 23962479

A comparative study of statistical methods used to identify dependencies between gene expression signals.

Suzana de Siqueira Santos, Daniel Yasumasa Takahashi, Asuka Nakata, André Fujita.   

Abstract

One major task in molecular biology is to understand the dependency among genes to model gene regulatory networks. Pearson's correlation is the most common method used to measure dependence between gene expression signals, but it works well only when data are linearly associated. For other types of association, such as non-linear or non-functional relationships, methods based on the concepts of rank correlation and information theory-based measures are more adequate than the Pearson's correlation, but are less used in applications, most probably because of a lack of clear guidelines for their use. This work seeks to summarize the main methods (Pearson's, Spearman's and Kendall's correlations; distance correlation; Hoeffding's D: measure; Heller-Heller-Gorfine measure; mutual information and maximal information coefficient) used to identify dependency between random variables, especially gene expression data, and also to evaluate the strengths and limitations of each method. Systematic Monte Carlo simulation analyses ranging from sample size, local dependence and linear/non-linear and also non-functional relationships are shown. Moreover, comparisons in actual gene expression data are carried out. Finally, we provide a suggestive list of methods that can be used for each type of data set.
© The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  correlation; data analysis; dependence; network

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23962479     DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbt051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  28 in total

1.  The gene regulatory network of mESC differentiation: a benchmark for reverse engineering methods.

Authors:  Johannes Meisig; Nils Blüthgen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Contrast sensitivity is associated with outer-retina thickness in early-stage diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Jason C Park; Karen Liu; Michelle Liu; Yi-Fan Chen; Felix Y Chau; Jennifer I Lim
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.761

3.  Item-Level Psychometric Analysis of the Psychosocial Processes at Work Scale (PROPSIT) in Workers.

Authors:  César Merino-Soto; Arturo Juárez-García; Guillermo Salinas-Escudero; Filiberto Toledano-Toledano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  A procedure to detect general association based on concentration of ranks.

Authors:  Pratyaydipta Rudra; Yihui Zhou; Fred A Wright
Journal:  Stat (Int Stat Inst)       Date:  2017-02-16

5.  Function of cancer associated genes revealed by modern univariate and multivariate association tests.

Authors:  Malka Gorfine; Boaz Goldstein; Alla Fishman; Ruth Heller; Yair Heller; Ayelet T Lamm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Differential correlation for sequencing data.

Authors:  Charlotte Siska; Katerina Kechris
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-01-19

7.  TopoICSim: a new semantic similarity measure based on gene ontology.

Authors:  Rezvan Ehsani; Finn Drabløs
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Cross platform analysis of methylation, miRNA and stem cell gene expression data in germ cell tumors highlights characteristic differences by tumor histology.

Authors:  Jenny N Poynter; Jessica R B M Bestrashniy; Kevin A T Silverstein; Anthony J Hooten; Christopher Lees; Julie A Ross; Jakub Tolar
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Selecting biologically informative genes in co-expression networks with a centrality score.

Authors:  Francisco J Azuaje
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 4.540

10.  DTW-MIC Coexpression Networks from Time-Course Data.

Authors:  Samantha Riccadonna; Giuseppe Jurman; Roberto Visintainer; Michele Filosi; Cesare Furlanello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.