Literature DB >> 23962010

The end of the line for a brain-damaged model of unilateral neglect.

M C Mozer1, P W Halligan, J C Marshall.   

Abstract

For more than a century, it has been known that damage to the right hemisphere of the brain can cause patients to be unaware of the contralesional side of space. This condition, known as unilateral neglect, represents a collection of clinically related spatial disorders characterized by the failure in free vision to respond, explore, or orient to stimuli predominantly located on the side of space opposite the damaged hemisphere. Recent studies using the simple task of line bisection, a conventional diagnostic test, have proven surprisingly revealing with respect to the spatial and attentional impairments involved in neglect. In line bisection, the patient is asked to mark the midpoint of a thin horizontal lie on a sheet of paper. Neglect patients generally transect far to the right of the center. Extensive studies of line bisection have been conducted, manipulating-among other factors-line length, orientation, and position. We have simulated the pattern of results using an existing computational model of visual perception and selective attention called MORSEL (Mozer, 1991). MORSEL has already been used to model data in a related disorder, neglect dyslexia (Mozer & Behrmann, 1990). In this earlier work, MORSEL was "lesioned" in accordance with the damage we suppose to have occurred in the brains of neglect patients. The same model and lesion can simulate the detailed pattern of performance on line bisection, including the following observations: (1) no consistent across-subject bias is found in normals; (2) transection displacements are proportional to line length in neglect patients; (3) variability of displacements is proportional to line length, in both normals and patients; (4) position of the lines with respect to the body or the page on which they are drawn has little effect; and (5) for lines drawn at different orientations, displacements are proportional to the cosine of the orientation angle. MORSEL fails to account for one observation: across patients, the variability of displacements for a particular line length is roughly proportional to mean displacement. Nonetheless, the overall fit of the model is sufficiently good that we believe MORSEL can be used as a diagnostic tool to characterize the specific nature of a patient's deficit, and thereby has potential down the line in therapy.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 23962010     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.2.171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.

Authors:  Mark Mennemeier; Christopher A Pierce; Anjan Chatterjee; Britt Anderson; George Jewell; Rachael Dowler; Adam J Woods; Tannahill Glenn; Victor W Mark
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Numbers and space: a cognitive illusion?

Authors:  Maria Dolores de Hevia; Luisa Girelli; Giuseppe Vallar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Modeling orienting behavior and its disorders with "ecological" neural networks.

Authors:  Andrea Di Ferdinando; Domenico Parisi; Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Modelling the differential effects of prisms on perception and action in neglect.

Authors:  Steven Leigh; James Danckert; Chris Eliasmith
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Neurorobotic Models of Neurological Disorders: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Savva Pronin; Liam Wellacott; Jhielson Pimentel; Renan C Moioli; Patricia A Vargas
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Modelling visual neglect: computational insights into conscious perception.

Authors:  Linda J Lanyon; Susan L Denham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Distractor removal amplifies spatial frequency-specific crossover of the attentional bias: a psychophysical and Monte Carlo simulation study.

Authors:  Jiaqing Chen; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effect of a visual distractor on line bisection.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Alessandro Iavarone; Andrea Viggiano; Marcellino Monda; Sergio Carlomagno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The Predictive Nature of Pseudoneglect for Visual Neglect: Evidence from Parietal Theta Burst Stimulation.

Authors:  Alice Varnava; Martynas Dervinis; Christopher D Chambers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Lateral specialization in unilateral spatial neglect: a cognitive robotics model.

Authors:  Daniela Conti; Santo Di Nuovo; Angelo Cangelosi; Alessandro Di Nuovo
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2016-03-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.