Literature DB >> 23961309

Complete genome sequence of the bile-resistant pigment-producing anaerobe Alistipes finegoldii type strain (AHN2437(T)).

Konstantinos Mavromatis1, Erko Stackebrandt, Christine Munk, Alla Lapidus, Matt Nolan, Susan Lucas, Nancy Hammon, Shweta Deshpande, Jan-Fang Cheng, Roxanne Tapia, Lynne A Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Ioanna Pagani, Natalia Ivanova, Natalia Mikhailova, Marcel Huntemann, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Manfred Rohde, Sabine Gronow, Markus Göker, John C Detter, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk, Tanja Woyke.   

Abstract

Alistipes finegoldii Rautio et al. 2003 is one of five species of Alistipes with a validly published name: family Rikenellaceae, order Bacteroidetes, class Bacteroidia, phylum Bacteroidetes. This rod-shaped and strictly anaerobic organism has been isolated mostly from human tissues. Here we describe the features of the type strain of this species, together with the complete genome sequence, and annotation. A. finegoldii is the first member of the genus Alistipes for which the complete genome sequence of its type strain is now available. The 3,734,239 bp long single replicon genome with its 3,302 protein-coding and 68 RNA genes is part of the G enomic E ncyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GEBA; Gram-negative; Rikenellaceae; chemoorganotrophic; mesophile; non-motile; non-sporulating; rod-shaped; strictly anaerobic

Year:  2013        PMID: 23961309      PMCID: PMC3739176          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.3527032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain AHN2437T (= DSM 17242 = CCUG 46020 = JCM 16770) is the type strain of [1,2]. This strain is one of several strains with similar properties [3] that were isolated mainly from pediatric patients with inflamed, gangrenous or non-inflamed appendices [4,5]. Though the type strain AHN2437T resembled members of the group in bile-resistance and positive indole reaction, it was found, together with the type strain of to form a separate phylogenetic lineage apart from authentic species [1]. The genus was established to accommodate these two species and has subsequently been enlarged to encompass three additional species with validly published names and one with an effectively published name [6,7]. According to the position in ‘The All-Species Living Tree‘ 16S rRNA gene sequence dendrogram [8], the genus is a sister clade of , formerly [9,10], the two genera constituting the family [11,12]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for AHN2437T together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

16S rDNA gene sequence analysis

A representative genomic 16S rRNA gene sequence of AHN2437T was compared using NCBI BLAST [13,14] under default settings (e.g., considering only the high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) from the best 250 hits) with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [15] and the relative frequencies of taxa and keywords (reduced to their stem [16]) were determined, weighted by BLAST scores. The most frequently occurring genera were (84.4%) and (15.6%) (19 hits in total). Regarding the three hits to sequences from members of the species, the average identity within HSPs was 98.7%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 98.0%. Regarding the nine hits to sequences from other members of the genus, the average identity within HSPs was 96.5%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 100.1%. Among all other species, the one yielding the highest score was (AB554233), which corresponded to an identity of 97.2% and an HSP coverage of 100.0%. (Note that the Greengenes database uses the INSDC (= EMBL/NCBI/DDBJ) annotation, which is not an authoritative source for nomenclature or classification.) The highest-scoring environmental sequence was AY643083 (Greengenes short name 'Isolation finegoldii blood two patients colon cancer ; clone 3'), which showed an identity of 100.0% and an HSP coverage of 99.4%. The most frequently occurring keywords within the labels of all environmental samples which yielded hits were 'human' (11.5%), 'fecal' (8.1%), 'intestin' (5.5%), 'biopsi' (4.2%) and 'mucos' (4.0%) (231 hits in total). The most frequently occurring keywords within the labels of those environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species were 'finegoldii' (18.2%), 'alistip, blood, cancer, colon, isol, patient, two' (9.1%) and 'fecal, human' (9.1%) (2 hits in total). These keywords are in accordance with the original isolation source of . Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of in a 16S rRNA gene based tree. The sequences of the two 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome differ from each other by ten nucleotides, and differ by up to ten nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA gene sequence (AY643083).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of relative to the type strains of the other species within the family . The tree was inferred from 1,432 aligned characters [17,18] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [19]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [20] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 1,000 ML bootstrap replicates [21] (left) and from 1,000 maximum-parsimony bootstrap replicates [22] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [23] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks. See also the species the not yet validly published names described together with their genome sequences in [6].

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of relative to the type strains of the other species within the family . The tree was inferred from 1,432 aligned characters [17,18] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [19]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [20] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 1,000 ML bootstrap replicates [21] (left) and from 1,000 maximum-parsimony bootstrap replicates [22] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [23] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks. See also the species the not yet validly published names described together with their genome sequences in [6].
Table 1

Classification and general features of AHN2437T according to the MIGS recommendations [24].

MIGS ID      Property     Term    Evidence code
     Domain: Bacteria    TAS [25]
     Phylum Bacteroidetes    TAS [12,26]
     Class Bacteroidia    TAS [12,27]
      Current classification     Order Bacteroidales    TAS [12,28]
     Family Rikenellaceae    TAS [11,12]
     Genus Alistipes    TAS [1,2]
     Species Alistipes finegoldii    TAS [1,2]
MIGS-12      Reference for biomaterial     Rautio et al., 2003    TAS [1]
MIGS-7      Subspecific genetic lineage (strain)     AHN2437T    TAS [1]
      Gram stain     negative    TAS [1]
      Cell shape     rod-shaped    TAS [1]
      Motility     non-motile    TAS [1]
      Sporulation     non-sporulating    TAS [1]
      Temperature range     mesophile    TAS [1]
      Optimum temperature     37°C    TAS [1]
      Salinity     not reported
MIGS-22      Relationship to oxygen     strictly anaerobe    TAS [1]
      Carbon source     not reported
      Energy metabolism     chemoorganotroph    TAS [1]
MIGS-6      Habitat     probably human gut    TAS [1]
MIGS-6.2      pH     not reported
MIGS-15      Biotic relationship     unknown
MIGS-14      Known pathogenicity     none    TAS [1]
MIGS-16      Specific host     Homo sapiens    TAS [1]
MIGS-18      Health status of Host     unknown
      Biosafety level     1    TAS [29]
MIGS-19      Trophic level     unknown
MIGS-23.1      Isolation     human appendix tissue    TAS [1]
MIGS-4      Geographic location     Helsinki, Finland    TAS [1]
MIGS-5      Time of sample collection     1988    NAS
MIGS-4.1      Latitude     not reported
MIGS-4.2      Longitude     not reported
MIGS-4.3      Depth     not reported
MIGS-4.4      Altitude     not reported

Evidence codes: TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). Evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [30].

Evidence codes: TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). Evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [30].

Morphology and physiology

Most members of were isolated on -bile-esculin (BBE) agar, others on kanamycin/vancomycin laked blood agar. Cells stain Gram-negative, and are non-spore forming and rod-shaped with rounded ends (0.2 x 0.8 to 2 μm), mostly occurring singly, though longer filaments are observed occasionally (Figure 2). After 4 days growth on sheep blood agar colonies are 0.3–1.0 mm in diameter, circular, gray, translucent or opaque and weakly β-hemolytic. On laked rabbit blood agar colonies are light brown after 4 days incubation, turning reddish or chocolate brown after 10 days [1,3]. Growth temperature is 37°C [31]. The organism is strictly anaerobic, indole-positive, catalase-negative and grows in peptone-yeast extract-glucose containing 20% bile [1,3]. Nitrate is not reduced to nitrite, gelatin is liquefied and esculin hydrolysis is negative. Metabolism is fermentative, however, due to scanty growth on agar media and in liquid media, carbohydrate metabolism is difficult to evaluate. In PYG broth, succinic acid is the major end product, while acetic and propionic acids are minor products; isovaleric and lactic acids are sometimes produced in very small amounts. Acid- and alkaline phosphatases, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, esterase, esterase lipase, α- and β-galactosidases, and α-glucosidase are detected in the API ZYM (bioMérieux) gallery, while no activity is detected for lipase C4, leucine/valine/cystine arylamidases, trypsin, β-glucuronidase, β-glucosidase or α-mannosidase. In addition, using Rosco diagnostic tablets (Rosco, Taastrup, Denmark), α-fucosidase is detected, but not β-xylosidase or trypsin. Strains are resistant to vancomycin (5 μg), kanamycin (1,000 μg), and colistin (10 μg). Susceptibility to penicillin varies and some strains produce β-lactamase (reaction for the type strain has not been specified) [1,3].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of AHN2437T

Scanning electron micrograph of AHN2437T Strain AHN2437T was isolated from a human appendiceal tissue sample. The habitat is not known but strains are probably members of the microflora of the human gut [1]. -type organisms were identified by molecular methods as part of the microbiota of chicken guts [32] and they were detected in blood cultures from colon cancer patients [33].

Chemotaxonomy

The major cellular fatty acid of strain AHN2437T is iso-C15:0; smaller amounts (with 5 to 10% occurrence) are anteiso-C15:0, C15:0, C16:0, iso-C17:0, and one or both of C17:0 iso-3OH/C18:2 DMA. The mol% G+C of DNA is 57 [1,3]. No information is available for the peptidoglycan composition, isoprenoid composition, polar lipids or whole cell sugars.

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [34], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of and project [35]. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [23] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using state of the art sequencing technology [46]. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

    MIGS ID    Property     Term
    MIGS-31    Finishing quality     Finished
    MIGS-28    Libraries used     Three genomic libraries: one 454 pyrosequence standard library,     one 454 PE library (11.0 kb insert size), one Illumina library
    MIGS-29    Sequencing platforms     Illumina GAii, 454 GS FLX Titanium
    MIGS-31.2    Sequencing coverage     133.3 × Illumina; 27.8 × pyrosequence
    MIGS-30    Assemblers     Newbler version 2.3, Velvet version 1.0.13,     Phrap version SPS - 4.24
    MIGS-32    Gene calling method     Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
    INSDC ID     CP003274
    GenBank Date of Release     June 8, 2012
    GOLD ID     Gc02257
    NCBI project ID     440775
    Database: IMG-GEBA     2509601035
    MIGS-13    Source material identifier     DSM 17242
    Project relevance     Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

strain AHN2437T, DSM 17242, was grown anaerobically in DSMZ medium 104 (PYG, supplemented with vitamin solution (see DSMZ medium 131)) [36] at 37°C. DNA was isolated from 1-1.5 g of cell paste using MasterPure Gram-positive DNA purification kit (Epicentre MGP04100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer with modification st/LALM for cell lysis as described in Wu et al. 2009 [35]. DNA is available through the DNA Bank Network [37].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website [38]. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisting of 103 contigs in four scaffolds was converted into a phrap [39] assembly by making fake reads from the consensus, to collect the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina GAii sequencing data (500.5 Mb) was assembled with Velvet [40] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 2.0 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The 454 draft assembly was based on 160.8 Mb 454 draft data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package [39] was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution [38], Dupfinisher [41], or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F. Chang, unpublished). A total of 696 additional reactions and 2 shatter libraries were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI [42]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 161.1 × coverage of the genome. The final assembly contained 324,940 pyrosequence and 13,793,104 Illumina reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [43] as part of the DOE-JGI genome annotation pipeline [47], followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [44]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [45].

Genome properties

The genome statistics are provided in Table 3 and Figure 3. The genome consists of one circular chromosome with a total length of 3,734,239 bp and a G+C content of 56.6%. Of the 3,302 genes predicted, 3,234 were protein-coding genes, and 68 RNAs; 121 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (62.0%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute    Value    % of Total
Genome size (bp)    3,734,239    100.00
DNA coding region (bp)    3,244,847    86.89
DNA G+C content (bp)    2,115,287    56.65
Number of replicons    1
Extrachromosomal elements    0
Total genes    3,302    100.00
RNA genes    68    2.06
rRNA operons    2
tRNA genes    52    1.57
Protein-coding genes    3,234    97.94
Pseudo genes    121    3.66
Genes with function prediction    2,046    61.96
Genes in paralog clusters    1,627    49.27
Genes assigned to COGs    1,974    59.78
Genes assigned Pfam domains    2,183    66.11
Genes with signal peptides    967    29.29
Genes with transmembrane helices    642    19.44
CRISPR repeats    0
Figure 3

Graphical map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew (purple/olive).

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code    Value    %age     Description
J    144    6.8     Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A    ...    ...     RNA processing and modification
K    140    6.6     Transcription
L    214    10.0     Replication, recombination and repair
B    ...    ...     Chromatin structure and dynamics
D    36    1.7     Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y    ...    ...     Nuclear structure
V    40    1.9     Defense mechanisms
T    81    3.8     Signal transduction mechanisms
M    171    8.0     Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N    7    0.3     Cell motility
Z    ...    ...     Cytoskeleton
W    ...    ...     Extracellular structures
U    56    2.6     Intracellular trafficking and secretion, and vesicular transport
O    77    3.6     Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C    127    6.0     Energy production and conversion
G    165    7.7     Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E    141    6.6     Amino acid transport and metabolism
F    56    2.6     Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H    92    4.3     Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I    55    2.6     Lipid transport and metabolism
P    113    5.3     Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q    20    0.9     Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R    259    12.2     General function prediction only
S    137    6.4     Function unknown
-    1,328    40.2     Not in COGs
Graphical map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew (purple/olive).
  27 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 4.  En route to a genome-based classification of Archaea and Bacteria?

Authors:  H-P Klenk; M Göker
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.022

5.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea.

Authors:  Dongying Wu; Philip Hugenholtz; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Rüdiger Pukall; Eileen Dalin; Natalia N Ivanova; Victor Kunin; Lynne Goodwin; Martin Wu; Brian J Tindall; Sean D Hooper; Amrita Pati; Athanasios Lykidis; Stefan Spring; Iain J Anderson; Patrik D'haeseleer; Adam Zemla; Mitchell Singer; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Alex Copeland; Cliff Han; Feng Chen; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Cheryl Kerfeld; Elke Lang; Sabine Gronow; Patrick Chain; David Bruce; Edward M Rubin; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Jonathan A Eisen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Alistipes finegoldii in blood cultures from colon cancer patients.

Authors:  Lukas Fenner; Véronique Roux; Pascal Ananian; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Genome sequence and description of Alistipes senegalensis sp. nov.

Authors:  Ajay Kumar Mishra; Gregory Gimenez; Jean-Christophe Lagier; Catherine Robert; Didier Raoult; Pierre-Edouard Fournier
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2012-07-20
View more
  5 in total

1.  Potential Probiotic or Trigger of Gut Inflammation - The Janus-Faced Nature of Cannabidiol-Rich Cannabis Extract.

Authors:  Charles M Skinner; Intawat Nookaew; Laura E Ewing; Thidathip Wongsurawat; Piroon Jenjaroenpun; Charles M Quick; Eric U Yee; Brian D Piccolo; Mahmoud ElSohly; Larry A Walker; Bill Gurley; Igor Koturbash
Journal:  J Diet Suppl       Date:  2020-05-13

2.  T cell epitope mimicry between Sjögren's syndrome Antigen A (SSA)/Ro60 and oral, gut, skin and vaginal bacteria.

Authors:  Agnieszka Szymula; Jacob Rosenthal; Barbara M Szczerba; Harini Bagavant; Shu Man Fu; Umesh S Deshmukh
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Evolutionary biologic changes of gut microbiota in an 'adenoma-carcinoma sequence' mouse colorectal cancer model induced by 1, 2-Dimethylhydrazine.

Authors:  Teng Sun; Shanglong Liu; Yanbing Zhou; Zengwu Yao; Dongfeng Zhang; Shougen Cao; Zhiliang Wei; Bin Tan; Yi Li; Zheng Lian; Song Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-03

4.  The high prevalence of Clostridioides difficile among nursing home elders associates with a dysbiotic microbiome.

Authors:  John P Haran; Doyle V Ward; Shakti K Bhattarai; Ethan Loew; Protiva Dutta; Amanda Higgins; Beth A McCormick; Vanni Bucci
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

5.  Pine (Pinus massoniana Lamb.) Needle Extract Supplementation Improves Performance, Egg Quality, Serum Parameters, and the Gut Microbiome in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Yanxin Guo; Shimeng Huang; Lihong Zhao; Jianyun Zhang; Cheng Ji; Qiugang Ma
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-02-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.