Literature DB >> 23961259

Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in lung adenocarcinoma in India: A single center study.

Dinesh Chandra Doval1, Saud Azam, Ullas Batra, Kumardeep Dutta Choudhury, Vineet Talwar, Sunil Kumar Gupta, Anurag Mehta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adenocarcinoma, a subgroup of non-small cell lung cancer, is the most frequent form occurring in the non-smokers. Mutation in tyrosine kinase domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been a common feature observed in lung adenocarcinoma. The study was carried out to detect the prevalence of EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: EGFR mutation status in 166 lung adenocarcinoma patients was obtained retrospectively. Mutation tests were performed on paraffin embedded tissue blocks as a routine diagnostic procedure by polymerase chain reaction followed by direct nucleotide sequencing. Patient's demographics and other clinical details were obtained from the medical records.
RESULTS: EGFR mutation was detected in 43/166 (25.9%) patients. Gender wise mutation was observed as 18/55 (32.7%) in females and 25/111 (22.5%) in males. Overall, EGFR mutation was correlated with never smokers and distant metastasis (P < 0.05), but not associated with the gender, disease stage and pleural effusion. Exon 19 deletions were significantly correlated with females, never smokers, pleural effusion and distant metastasis (P < 0.05). However, point mutation on exon 21 did not show any statistical association with the above variables. Median overall survival was 22 months (95% confidence interval, 15.4-28.6). Female sex, EGFR mutation and absence of metastasis are associated with good prognosis.
CONCLUSION: EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma was higher in never smokers, females and patients with distant metastasis. However, it was not linked with tobacco smoking. The prevalence of EGFR mutation observed is in range with the previously published reports from the Asian countries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenocarcinoma; epidermal growth factor receptor; mutation; non-small cell lung cancer

Year:  2013        PMID: 23961259      PMCID: PMC3746453          DOI: 10.4103/1477-3163.114970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Carcinog        ISSN: 1477-3163


INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is a commonly diagnosed malignancy and among one of the leading causes of death around the world as well as in India. It accounts for 13% (1.6 million) of the total cancer cases and 18% (1.4 million) of the total cancer deaths world-wide in the year 2008.[1] It is most frequently diagnosed malignancy in Indian males and the 4th most common together in both the sexes.[2] In Delhi, lung cancer is the commonest malignancy in males and the 6th in females. In terms of cancer deaths, it acquires the highest position in males and the 5th position in females.[3] Lung cancer is usually associated with positive smoking history. However, of all the lung cancers diagnosed in the world, approximately 25% were never smokers.[4] Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) data in non-smokers from India were higher and reported from 52.7% to 39.5%.[56] Adenocarcinoma, a subgroup of NSCLC, is the most common form occurring in the non-smokers and smokers as well.[7] It generally presents in an advanced stage of the disease leaving a limited treatment option. Response to the standard chemotherapy regimens is poor with short median survival. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been associated with tumorigenesis in several malignancies including NSCLC.[89] Studies have also reported overexpression with the reduced survival in lung cancer.[8] EGFR is a transmembrane receptor protein kinase and is a member of the avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog (ErbB) family of receptors, which includes EGFR (ErbB-1), HER2/neu (ErbB-2), Her 3 (ErbB-3) and Her 4 (ErbB-4).[10] Receptor binding to the extracellular domain of EGFR causes protein kinase activation in the form of downstream signaling that lead to the growth, proliferation and invasion of the cell.[11] Somatic mutation in the tyrosine kinase (TK) domain of EGFR has been a common feature observed in lung adenocarcinoma,[12] which is being exploited in lung cancer treatment with TK inhibitors such as gefitinib and erlotinib,[1314] that blocks the cell signaling by binding to the TK domain. More recently, afatinib (a new molecule which is an irreversible ErbB family blocker) has shown promising results in a phase IIb/III trial by increasing the progression free survival in lung cancer patients who progressed after systemic chemotherapy and gefitinib/erlotinib therapy.[15] Mutations in the EGFR gene are generally associated with adenocarcinoma histology of lung cancer, female sex, non-smokers and Asian ethnicity.[1617] EGFR mutation data are available mostly from the population of East Asia ranging from 24% to 66.3%.[18-20] Studies from USA and Europe reported low mutation rates (13-17%) in these populations.[1221] A few reports are available from India as well which showed the overall EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma as 44-55%.[2223] Exons 19-21 are the most commonly studied exons, which generally serve as mutation hotspots. In-frame deletions and point mutations are the most frequently found mutations.[10121822] There are variations in the frequency of mutation observed within India.[23] More information and data from India is warranted to establish the rate of mutation in this ethnic group/Indian subcontinent. The present study was carried out to detect the prevalence of EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma in a tertiary care hospital in India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred-sixty six patients of lung adenocarcinoma with known EGFR mutation status (in routine diagnostic) were sequentially included in this study. Patient’s demographics, history and treatment details were obtained from the medical records. The data and information were collected retrospectively from a period of November 2009 to April 2012. Paraffin embedded tissue blocks (biopsies or surgically resected specimens), from primary tumors as well as from metastatic sites, were used for the mutation analysis. Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid was extracted and exons 18-21 of EGFR gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The amplified PCR product was subjected to the direct nucleotide sequencing for the detection of mutations. Primers for the PCR and methods were used as described previously.[13] Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, whichever was appropriate for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier method was applied for survival estimate and log rank test for comparing the difference between the subgroups. Cox proportional hazard method was used for the multivariate analysis. A two sided P < 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16 for Windows (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) was used in performing all the statistical analysis. Institutional Review Board of Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre had granted waiver for this study as the mutation analysis of EGFR is a part of the routine clinical practice that helps in decision making and treatment planning of the patient. Information and the detailed of history of patients were collected in a de-identified manner.

RESULTS

We included 166 NSCLC adenocarcinoma patients in this study, of which 111 (69.9%) were males [Table 1]. Median age of patients was 60 ± 9.36 (range 34-79) years. Among all patients, 57.2% were never smokers. EGFR mutation was detected in 43/166 (25.9%) patients. High mutation frequency was observed among the females (32.7%) than in males. Of all the mutations, the most predominant were in-frame deletion on exon 19 (51.2%) followed by point mutation on exon 21 (34.9%). The in-frame deletions comprises of del746-750 [Figure 1] and del747-752 and point mutation on exon 21 of L858R (14 cases) and L861Q (1 case). Point mutation G719A was observed in only one case on exon 18. Two insertions - ins774A and ins775H and D770-N771 ins SVD were seen in the exon 20 of EGFR gene. There were three cases where mutation on two exons were detected simultaneously, these were exons 20, 21 (T790M, L858R); exons 19, 21 (D761Y and L858R); exon 19, 20 (del746-750, Q787R).
Table 1

Patient demographics  (N=166)

Figure 1

Deletion of 15 base pairs on exon 19

Patient demographics  (N=166) Deletion of 15 base pairs on exon 19 A total 74% of patients presented with metastatic disease and the common sites of metastasis were bone (42.6%), brain (22.8%), liver (13.8%) and adrenal gland (9.6%). EGFR mutation was associated with never smokers and distant metastasis (P < 0.05), but it did not significantly correlate with the gender, disease stage and pleural effusion [Table 2]. However, a near significant correlation was observed in the patients in the age group 41-60 years (P = 0.054). The above mentioned variables were also compared with mutations in exon 19 and exon 21 (most predominant mutations in the study). Exon 19 deletions were significantly correlated with female gender, never smokers, pleural effusion and distant metastasis (P < 0.05). Point mutation on exon 21 was predominant in males; however, the result was not statistically significant [Table 3].
Table 2

Frequency of overall EGFR mutation and its correlation  (N=166)

Table 3

Exon.wise distribution of mutation and its correlation. (N=166)

Frequency of overall EGFR mutation and its correlation  (N=166) Exon.wise distribution of mutation and its correlation. (N=166) At the time of analysis, the survival status of 153/166 patients were known and hence included in the survival analysis. Mean follow-up was 12.3 months. Fifty eight out of 153 patients were deceased. Median overall survival (OS) was 22 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.4-28.6) [Figure 2]. Median OS was 16 months (95% CI, 11.6-20.4) in EGFR wild type and 31 months (95% CI, 17.1-44.9) in EFGR mutant patient (P = 0.024) [Figure 3a]. When gender was taken into account the median OS was 31 months in females (95% CI, 22.3-39.7) than 14 month (95% CI, 9.8-18.2) in males and the result was a near significant (P = 0.051) [Figure 3b]. Median survival was 23 months (95% CI, 13.2-32.8) for the age group 20-40 years, 13 months (95% CI, 17.8-44.2) for age group 41-60 years and 14 months (95% CI, 6.9-21.0) in age group more than 60 years (P = 0.032) [Figure 3c]. Distant metastasis was also a significant factor that effect survival. Median OS was 44 months in the patient presented without metastasis (95% CI, 12.6-75.2) and 17 months (95% CI, 10.9-23.1) in patients presented with metastasis at distant a site (P = 0.009) [Figure 3d]. Current smoker population showed shorter median OS (12 months) than never and former smoker population (27 and 22 months), however, the result was not statistically significant on log rank test. Other factors like presence or absence of co-morbidities (23 months vs. 16 months) and presence or absence pleural effusion (13 months vs. 23 months) also not achieved a statistical significance. Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazard have shown EGFR mutation (hazard ratio, 0.411; 95% CI, 0.189-0.894; P = 0.025), female gender (hazard ratio, 2.227; 95% CI, 1.173-4.226; P = 0.014) and absence of metastasis (hazard ratio, 3.248; 95% CI, 1.577-6.689; P = 0.001) to be associated with longer median OS, thereby indicating a good prognostic factor.
Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival

Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival according to (a) epidermal growth factor receptor mutation, (b) sex, (c) age and (d) distant metastasis at the time of presentation

Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival according to (a) epidermal growth factor receptor mutation, (b) sex, (c) age and (d) distant metastasis at the time of presentation Chemotherapy alone or in combination with radiotherapy (RT) and oral targeted therapy was the foremost treatment modality adopted to treat these patients. Common sites of RT were brain (48.6%), bone (31.4%) and lung (17.1%). Pemetrexed combined with platinum compounds (carboplatin or cisplatin) in a palliative setting was the main chemotherapy regimen while whole brain RT was generally offered to the patients presenting with symptomatic brain metastasis. Ninety percent of the patients who were EGFR mutation positive received oral targeted therapy in the form of erlotinib or gefitinib.

DISCUSSION

NSCLC is the largest subgroup of lung cancer harboring a majority of activating mutations in kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (K-ras) codon 12 and 13, p53 and EGFR.[24] Recently discovered echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) rearrangement by Soda et al., is sensitive to the ALK inhibitors.[25] Targeting these mutations has changed the overall treatment strategy for lung cancer and provides significant benefit to the patient. EGFR mutation screening is becoming a standard of care in the oncology clinical practice and treatment with inhibitors showed efficacy and increase in the survival of patients with EGFR mutation positive lung cancer. In this paper, we reported the prevalence of EGFR mutation in lung cancer in India with the data from a single institute. Lung cancer adenocarcinoma possesses higher EGFR mutation rates than any other form of NSCLC.[1426] In the present study, we examined mutation in the TK domain of EGFR which is most common factor of the activation of this receptor on the cell surface.[1327] Overall mutation in the present study was 25.9% which falls in the range of 10-66%,[2028] reported in the published papers, irrespective of region and ethnicity. Studies from Korea,[18] Taiwan,[29] Japan,[30] and China,[7] have observed EGFR mutation rates as 24%, 50.5%, 26.3% and 38.1%, respectively. In the populations from Europe and America, frequency of EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma has been observed as 17.3%,[12] 10.6%,[28] and 19%.[31] Our result is in line with reports from Asia. However, a study from India by Sahoo et al., has reported mutation frequency in lung adenocarcinoma as 44%.[22] Regional difference has also been reported within India as 65% mutation observed in southern Indian population and 33% in northern population, according to an abstract presented in a conference by Aggarwal et al.[23] Our study population comprises of northern part of India showing a mutation rate as 25.9%. The variation in the frequency observed around the world may be because of environmental, geographical and ethnic differences, different methodologies of mutation detection and exclusion of less occurring mutation like exon 18 in some studies.[2832] If there is a notable difference within India, it needs further evaluation by prospective population based studies. It could be suggested that there may be a presence of some unknown carcinogens in the atmosphere of this part of world that could lead to the mutation in this gene; however, this hypothesis needs to be explored. Point mutation on exon 21 and in-frame deletions on exon 19 of EGFR is the most commonly observed mutation and accounts for 80-90% of all the mutations detected.[3334] Our data shows a cumulative mutation of these two exons as 86.1%, which confirms the published reports that have pointed the dominance of mutation in these two exons. Dual mutations in the EGFR gene have also been observed in our study and these generally occur in combination with exon 19 deletion or exon 21 point mutation which provides us a hint that these mutations generally get activated in combination with the frequently occurring mutation. Higher EGFR mutation rate was observed in females than males (32.7% vs. 22.5%, P = 0.158) in the present study, but the result was not statistically significant. However, this observation is consistent with the previously published studies that have shown the female gender dominance in the EGFR mutation.[72835] Exon-wise comparison of mutations provide us a positive correlation of female sex, never smokers, presence of metastasis and pleural effusion with exon 19 deletions (P < 0.05). However, exon 21 did not show any correlation with these variables. A similar result was reported from a study,[22] that showed female sex and never smoking to be associated with exon 19 deletions, but not associated with exon 21 point mutation. On the other hand, Tanaka et al.,[35] reported the male gender to be associated with exon 19 deletions. The reason for female sex bias is not well-understood; however, Gazdar and Thun,[36] reported that estrogen and its receptors probably influence polymorphic genes expression that regulates tobacco carcinogen metabolism thereby promoting the lung carcinogenesis. Age has been categorized in three groups in this study and high mutation rate (62.8%) was observed in the age group of 41-60 years (P = 0.054), which is nearly significant as per the statistics. A similar result has also been observed (P = 0.06) with the age group 40-60 years, previously.[22] It could be suggested that the risk of mutation increases with increase in age that lead to the development of lung cancer. Tobacco smoking is a well-established factor and one of the major causes in lung cancer development. Lung cancer in never smokers is also frequently experienced world-wide. Our data of NSCLC in never smoker population (54.7%) is slightly higher than those of previously published reports from India by Krishnamurthy et al. (52.7%),[5] and Malik et al. (39.5%),[6] and is also higher in females than males. There has been an increasing trend of diagnosis of NSCLC with adenocarcinoma histology in never smoker group, world-wide and in India as well. In the present study, a positive correlation of EGFR mutation was established with the never smokers than the current and former smokers (54.7%, 21.4%, 9.3%; P = 0.004). The data confirms the previous studies which have also established a relationship of EGFR mutation with non-smokers.[142637] We observed that 96.4% females and 37.8% males were never smokers in our study while there was much lower percentage of never smokers in the western population. The difference in the smoking habits is reflected in the EGFR mutation data from around the world. Takano et al.,[32] suggested that EGFR mutation occurs in a random manner in the population, regardless of the smoking habits and other genetic mutations like K-ras, which occurs more frequently and EGFR less frequently in the smoker population. A review by Lee et al.,[24] have also showed EGFR mutation in the never smokers as a single genetic event in lung cancer rather than other genetic changes like K-ras, p53 which are more commonly observed in the smoker population. Another study indicated that carcinogens in the tobacco smoke mutate the Ras gene, however, in the never smokers where carcinogen is not present, the upstream pathway of EGFR gene is activated by unknown factors.[36] These findings indicate that lung cancer in EGFR positive cases does not occur via the carcinogenic process and pathways induced by tobacco and its product, rather it follows some other unknown pathways of carcinogenesis. These processes lead to the uncontrolled proliferation and invasion of cancer cell, which may develop metastasis at a distant site. In NSCLC, the majority of patients present with an advanced stage of the disease. Correlation of EGFR mutation and disease stage was not statistically significant even though majority of mutations were detected in patients with advanced stage (III/IV). However, EGFR mutation in the patients with distant metastasis was correlated statistically (P = 0.044). Frequently observed distant metastatic sites in this study were bone (43%), brain (22.2%), liver (14.1%) and adrenal gland (9.6%). Togashi et al.[38] correlated the presence of pulmonary metastasis with the EGFR mutation (P < 0.05), but their data is limited only to a particular metastatic site. In another study, mutation was associated with brain metastasis.[10] A recently published study in Dutch population,[28] and another study from Asia,[29] reported an increased EGFR mutation frequency in patients with pleural effusion. It may be suggested that EGFR mutation activates some unknown pathway involved in the process of metastasis. It may also be suggested that patients who have metastasis and pleural effusion in whom interventional biopsies are not possible may be considered as candidates for TK inhibitor therapy.[29] The survival analysis has revealed that female sex, presence of EGFR mutation and absence of distant metastasis are associated with improved median OS and also indicated as a good prognostic factor in a multivariate analysis. Previous studies have also reported a similar trend with female sex and EGFR mutation as indicators of good survival.[121829] The higher median OS in patients with EGFR mutation could be due to the better response to systemic chemotherapy and EGFR TK inhibitors. The present study has limitations due to its retrospective nature and some selection bias in terms of patients whose EGFR mutation was known or patients with advanced stage of the disease.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of EGFR mutation observed is in range with the previously published reports from the Asian countries. It is not associated with tobacco smoking as shown in our study as well as previously published reports, which indicates the involvement of an alternative mechanism of carcinogenesis other than tobacco and its products. Further, EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma is linked with females of Asian ethnicity, never smokers and in patients presenting with distant metastasis. Being responsive to oral TK inhibitors, the screening of this somatic mutation especially in females and/or never smokers could be very helpful in the further disease management of these patients.

AUTHOR'S PROFILE

Dr. Dinesh Chandra Doval: Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Research, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Sector - 5, Rohini, Delhi - 110 085, India. Mr. Saud Azam: Department of Research, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Sector - 5, Rohini, Delhi - 110 085, India. Dr. Ullas Batra: Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Sector - 5, Rohini, Delhi - 110 085, India. Dr. Kumardeep Dutta Choudhury: Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Sector - 5, Rohini, Delhi - 110 085, India. Dr. Vineet Talwar: Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Sector - 5, Rohini, Delhi - 110 085, India. Dr. Sunil Kumar Gupta: Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Sector - 5, Rohini, Delhi - 110 085, India. Dr. Anurag Mehta: Department of Laboratory Services, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Sector - 5, Rohini, Delhi - 110 085, India.
  35 in total

1.  Impact of smoking status and pathologic type on epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer.

Authors:  Yi-Sheng Huang; Jin-Ji Yang; Xu-Chao Zhang; Xue-Ning Yang; Yu-Juan Huang; Chong-Rui Xu; Qing Zhou; Zhen Wang; Jian Su; Yi-Long Wu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 2.  Lung cancer in never smokers: change of a mindset in the molecular era.

Authors:  Young Joo Lee; Joo-Hang Kim; Se Kyu Kim; Sang-Jun Ha; Tony S Mok; Tetsuya Mitsudomi; Byoung Chul Cho
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.705

3.  Afatinib versus placebo for patients with advanced, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of erlotinib, gefitinib, or both, and one or two lines of chemotherapy (LUX-Lung 1): a phase 2b/3 randomised trial.

Authors:  Vincent A Miller; Vera Hirsh; Jacques Cadranel; Yuh-Min Chen; Keunchil Park; Sang-We Kim; Caicun Zhou; Wu-Chou Su; Mengzhao Wang; Yan Sun; Dae Seog Heo; Lucio Crino; Eng-Huat Tan; Tsu-Yi Chao; Mehdi Shahidi; Xiuyu Julie Cong; Robert M Lorence; James Chih-Hsin Yang
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of a large series of cases and development of a rapid and sensitive method for diagnostic screening with potential implications on pharmacologic treatment.

Authors:  Antonio Marchetti; Carla Martella; Lara Felicioni; Fabio Barassi; Simona Salvatore; Antonio Chella; Pier P Camplese; Teodorico Iarussi; Felice Mucilli; Andrea Mezzetti; Franco Cuccurullo; Rocco Sacco; Fiamma Buttitta
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Spectrum of LKB1, EGFR, and KRAS mutations in chinese lung adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Bin Gao; Yihua Sun; Junhua Zhang; Yan Ren; Rong Fang; Xiangkun Han; Lei Shen; Xin-Yuan Liu; William Pao; Haiquan Chen; Hongbin Ji
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  Frequency of and variables associated with the EGFR mutation and its subtypes.

Authors:  Tomoaki Tanaka; Masaru Matsuoka; Akihisa Sutani; Akihiko Gemma; Makoto Maemondo; Akira Inoue; Shoji Okinaga; Makoto Nagashima; Satoshi Oizumi; Kazutsugu Uematsu; Yoshiaki Nagai; Gaku Moriyama; Hitoshi Miyazawa; Kenji Ikebuchi; Satoshi Morita; Kunihiko Kobayashi; Koichi Hagiwara
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  The relevance of "Nonsmoking-associated lung cancer" in India: a single-centre experience.

Authors:  A Krishnamurthy; R Vijayalakshmi; V Gadigi; R Ranganathan; T G Sagar
Journal:  Indian J Cancer       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.224

8.  Screening for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer.

Authors:  Rafael Rosell; Teresa Moran; Cristina Queralt; Rut Porta; Felipe Cardenal; Carlos Camps; Margarita Majem; Guillermo Lopez-Vivanco; Dolores Isla; Mariano Provencio; Amelia Insa; Bartomeu Massuti; Jose Luis Gonzalez-Larriba; Luis Paz-Ares; Isabel Bover; Rosario Garcia-Campelo; Miguel Angel Moreno; Silvia Catot; Christian Rolfo; Noemi Reguart; Ramon Palmero; José Miguel Sánchez; Roman Bastus; Clara Mayo; Jordi Bertran-Alamillo; Miguel Angel Molina; Jose Javier Sanchez; Miquel Taron
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Frequent epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in malignant pleural effusion of lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  S-G Wu; C-H Gow; C-J Yu; Y-L Chang; C-H Yang; Y-C Hsu; J-Y Shih; Y-C Lee; P-C Yang
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 16.671

10.  EGFR and KRAS mutations in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  Tae Won Jang; Chul Ho Oak; Hee Kyung Chang; Soon Jung Suo; Mann Hong Jung
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.165

View more
  13 in total

1.  Molecular spectrum of somatic EGFR and KRAS gene mutations in non small cell lung carcinoma: determination of frequency, distribution pattern and identification of novel variations in Indian patients.

Authors:  Bibhu Ranjan Das; Sangeet Bhaumik; Firoz Ahmad; Aziz Mandsaurwala; Heena Satam
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Frequency of brain metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer, and their association with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.

Authors:  Toshihiko Iuchi; Masato Shingyoji; Meiji Itakura; Sana Yokoi; Yasumitsu Moriya; Hajime Tamura; Yasushi Yoshida; Hironori Ashinuma; Koichiro Kawasaki; Yuzo Hasegawa; Tsukasa Sakaida; Toshihiko Iizasa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  EGFR mutation incidence in non-small-cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology: a systematic review and global map by ethnicity (mutMapII).

Authors:  Anita Midha; Simon Dearden; Rose McCormack
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  Clinical and epidemiological study of EGFR mutations and EML4-ALK fusion genes among Indian patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  Dc Doval; K Prabhash; S Patil; H Chaturvedi; C Goswami; Ak Vaid; S Desai; S Dutt; Vh Veldore; N Jambhekar; A Mehta; D Hazarika; S Azam; S Gawande; S Gupta
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations based on mutation specific immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung cancer: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Deepali Jain; Sobuhi Iqbal; Ritika Walia; Prabhat Malik; Sunu Cyriac; Sandeep R Mathur; Mehar C Sharma; Karan Madan; Anant Mohan; Ashu Bhalla; Sushmita Pathy; Lalit Kumar; Randeep Guleria
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Clinicopathological and molecular epidemiological study of lung cancer patients seen at a tertiary care hospital in Northern India.

Authors:  Randeep Singh; Nitesh Rohtagi
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

7.  Molecular biology tools for precision medicine in managing lung cancer.

Authors:  P A Mahesh
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

8.  Efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: Does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation?

Authors:  Amit Joshi; Vijay Patil; Vanita Noronha; Anuradha Chougule; Atanu Bhattacharjee; Rajiv Kumar; Supriya Goud; Sucheta More; Anant Ramaswamy; Ashay Karpe; Nikhil Pande; Arun Chandrasekharan; Alok Goel; Vikas Talreja; Abhishek Mahajan; Amit Janu; Nilendu Purandare; Kumar Prabhash
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

9.  A study of therapy targeted EGFR/ALK mutations in Indian patients with lung adenocarcinoma: A clinical and epidemiological study.

Authors:  Vandana Rana; Praveer Ranjan; Rajat Jagani; K R Rathi; Dharmesh Kumar; Anurag Khera
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-11-28

10.  Relationship of epidermal growth factor receptor activating mutations with histologic subtyping according to International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society 2011 adenocarcinoma classification and their impact on overall survival.

Authors:  Venkata Nagarjuna Maturu; Navneet Singh; Amanjit Bal; Nalini Gupta; Ashim Das; Digambar Behera
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2016 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.