Literature DB >> 23961010

Compliance to patching in the treatment of amblyopia.

Ahmed Al-Yahya1, Khalid Al-Odan, Khalid Allam, Badriya Al-Onazi, Ahmed Mousa, Ahmed A Al-Saleh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate compliance of amblyopic patients to patching, and to identify reasons of poor compliance and suggest methods to overcome the problem.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, retrospective study that included 37 families with a child diagnosed with unilateral amblyopia (age range 3-16 years) and attending the Pediatrics Ophthalmology clinic at the King Abdulaziz University Hospital (a tertiary eye hospital). Data were collected through interviews and from hospital charts. In the interviews we asked questions that sought information with regard to four aspects (domains); knowledge, attitude, insight and community's effect. A score representing each domain was given to every family then we correlated these scores with family's compliance percentage.
RESULTS: When correlated with compliance, the insight and attitude domains showed a statistically significant correlation; p-value 0.002 and 0.004, respectively. However, the knowledge and community's effect domains were not; p-value 0.084 and 0.114, respectively. Other qualitative factors affecting compliance were identified with open questions. Quotes from families of what they think can improve compliance are shown.
CONCLUSION: To improve compliance, merely educating patients is not sufficient and more efforts should be undertaken toward ensuring true sense of the problem and its impact. Factors affecting compliance due to the physical properties in the patch itself should be addressed too (heat, irritation, poor adhesive material and design).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amblyopia; Patching; Pediatric ophthalmology

Year:  2012        PMID: 23961010      PMCID: PMC3729804          DOI: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2012.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1319-4534


  7 in total

1.  Anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia in the age group 2 years and above: a prospective study of the results of treatment.

Authors:  J Lithander; J Sjöstrand
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Amblyopia.

Authors:  Nipa R Doshi; Maria Lourdes F Rodriguez
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.292

3.  The psychosocial effects of amblyopia study.

Authors:  E A Packwood; O A Cruz; P J Rychwalski; R V Keech
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Predictors and a remedy for noncompliance with amblyopia therapy in children measured with the occlusion dose monitor.

Authors:  Sjoukje E Loudon; Maria Fronius; Caspar W N Looman; Musarat Awan; Brigitte Simonsz; Paul J van der Maas; Huibert J Simonsz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Why is compliance with occlusion therapy for amblyopia so hard? A qualitative study.

Authors:  M Dixon-Woods; M Awan; I Gottlob
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Design of the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS).

Authors:  C E Stewart; A R Fielder; D A Stephens; M J Moseley
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 7.  Amblyopia and quality of life: a systematic review.

Authors:  J Carlton; E Kaltenthaler
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.775

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Pediatric Ophthalmology: Changing with the times.

Authors:  Jonathan C Song
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-01

2.  The awareness of amblyopia among parents in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ali M Alsaqr; Ali M Masmali
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.