Literature DB >> 1995038

Anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia in the age group 2 years and above: a prospective study of the results of treatment.

J Lithander1, J Sjöstrand.   

Abstract

Forty-four children aged 2-9 years with strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia were prospectively followed up during amblyopia treatment. The efficacy of optimised treatment in terms of number of cured children, time to achieve cure, and rate of initial improvement of visual acuity was evaluated in relation to age at start of treatment, type and initial degree of amblyopia, and adherence to treatment regimen. Compliance with treatment was the most critical factor predicting a successful outcome. Among the compliant children 35 out of 36 were cured (visual acuity difference between amblyopic and non-amblyopic eyes not more than one line) within five months regardless of age, treatment regimen, and type or initial degree of amblyopia as compared with none in the group with low compliance. Most of these compliant children were cured within three months, with shorter treatment times on average for the younger children. The initial improvement of visual acuity was also faster at 2 years than at 4 years of age. Anisometropes with moderate amblyopia at the start of treatment were over-represented in the group with low compliance. We conclude that early diagnosis of strabismus in combination with general population screening at the age of 4 to detect amblyopia caused by anisometropia or microstrabismus seems to be efficacious for the cure of most cases. The major factor in treatment failure was found to be inadequate adherence to the treatment regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1995038      PMCID: PMC504127          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.75.2.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  17 in total

1.  A screening test for visual acuity in four year old children.

Authors:  W NORDLOW; S JOACHIMSSON
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1962

Review 2.  Current trends in amblyopia therapy.

Authors:  J T Flynn; J C Cassady
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Screening of pre-school children for ocular anomalies. II. Amblyopia. Prevalence and therapeutic results at different ages.

Authors:  M Oliver; I Nawratzki
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  [A new test (C-test) for quantitative examination of crowding with test results in amblyopic and ametropic patients (author's transl)].

Authors:  W Haase; A Hohmann
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 0.700

5.  Differences in vernier discrimination for grating between strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes.

Authors:  D M Levi; S Klein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Differences in the neural basis of human amblyopias: the effect of mean luminance.

Authors:  R F Hess; F W Campbell; R Zimmern
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Visual disorders in 7-year-old children with and without previous vision screening.

Authors:  L Köhler; G Stigmar
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Scand       Date:  1978-05

8.  Contrast sensitivity in children with strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. A study of the effect of treatment.

Authors:  J Sjöstrand
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1981-02

9.  Visual results in aphakic children.

Authors:  M M Parks
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  A modified letter matching chart for testing young children's visual acuity.

Authors:  A Hedin; K G Nyman; B Derouet
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1980 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  39 in total

1.  Efficacy of occlusion for strabismic amblyopia: can an optimal duration be identified?

Authors:  M Cleary
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Should we be screening for and treating amblyopia?

Authors:  Gordon N Dutton; Marie Cleary
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-29

3.  The association between anisometropia, amblyopia, and binocularity in the absence of strabismus.

Authors:  D R Weakley
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1999

4.  A value analysis model applied to the management of amblyopia.

Authors:  G R Beauchamp; M C Bane; D R Stager; P M Berry; W W Wright
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1999

5.  Recovery in microtropia: implications for aetiology and neurophysiology.

Authors:  M Cleary; C A Houston; R M McFadzean; G N Dutton
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Natural history of infantile anisometropia.

Authors:  M Abrahamsson; J Sjöstrand
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Long term visual outcome in amblyopia treatment.

Authors:  J Ohlsson; M Baumann; J Sjöstrand; M Abrahamsson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Photorefractive keratectomy for anisometropic amblyopia in children.

Authors:  Evelyn A Paysse
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

9.  Amblyopia therapy in Asian children: factors affecting visual outcome and parents' perception of children's attitudes towards amblyopia treatment.

Authors:  Swati Handa; Audrey Chia
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 1.858

10.  Design of the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS).

Authors:  C E Stewart; A R Fielder; D A Stephens; M J Moseley
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.