Literature DB >> 23960201

Anticipatory planning reveals segmentation of cortical motor output during action observation.

Loes Janssen1, Bert Steenbergen2, Richard G Carson3.   

Abstract

It has been argued that the variation in brain activity that occurs when observing another person reflects a representation of actions that is indivisible, and which plays out in full once the intent of the actor can be discerned. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation to probe the excitability of corticospinal projections to 2 intrinsic hand muscles while motions to reach and grasp an object were observed. A symbolic cue either faithfully indicated the required final orientation of the object and thus the nature of the grasp that was required, or was in conflict with the movement subsequently displayed. When the cue was veridical, modulation of excitability was in accordance with the functional role of the muscles in the action observed. If however the cue had indicated that the alternative grasp would be required, modulation of output to first dorsal interosseus was consistent with the action specified, rather than the action observed--until the terminal phase of the motion sequence during which the object was seen lifted. Modulation of corticospinal output during observation is thus segmented--it progresses initially in accordance with the action anticipated, and if discrepancies are revealed by visual input, coincides thereafter with that of the action seen.
© The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  human; motor cortex; reaching–grasping movement; transcranial magnetic stimulation; visuomotor

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23960201     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  5 in total

1.  Prior history of FDI muscle contraction: different effect on MEP amplitude and muscle activity.

Authors:  V L Talis; O V Kazennikov; J M Castellote; A A Grishin; M E Ioffe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Direct mapping rather than motor prediction subserves modulation of corticospinal excitability during observation of actions in real time.

Authors:  Nicolas Gueugneau; Sofia I Mc Cabe; Jorge I Villalta; Scott T Grafton; Valeria Della-Maggiore
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Space-dependent representation of objects and other's action in monkey ventral premotor grasping neurons.

Authors:  Luca Bonini; Monica Maranesi; Alessandro Livi; Leonardo Fogassi; Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Low or High-Level Motor Coding? The Role of Stimulus Complexity.

Authors:  Lucia Amoruso; Alessandra Finisguerra
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Motor activation is modulated by visual experience during cyclic gait observation: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Tomotaka Ito; Akio Tsubahara; Yoshiki Shiraga; Yosuke Yoshimura; Daisuke Kimura; Keita Suzuki; Kozo Hanayama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.