Literature DB >> 23959790

Peer assessment among first year medical students in anatomy.

John Spandorfer1, Tanya Puklus, Victoria Rose, Mithaq Vahedi, Lauren Collins, Carolyn Giordano, Richard Schmidt, Chris Braster.   

Abstract

Peer assessment has been shown to be an effective tool to promote professionalism in medical students. Peer assessment may be particularly useful in anatomy dissection laboratory as the required close collaboration and long hours of anatomy laboratory provide students insights into their peers' work habits and interpersonal skills. The objective of this study was to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the use of a validated peer assessment tool in Gross Anatomy. Students in a first year medical school class evaluated three members of their dissection group using an online survey tool. The mid-course and end-of-course evaluation included open-ended comments, as well as a five-point scale that measured three work habits, two interpersonal attributes and one overall score. All 267 students completed the assignment. The overall score and four of the five other assessed categories showed significant improvement from the mid- to end-of-course evaluations. Quantitative and qualitative data also revealed significant improvement among the students who received the lowest mid-course assessments. Seventy-six percent of the class agreed with the statement: "Based on the feedback I received, I made a change in how I worked with or taught my peers." The use of this peer assessment tool used by students in anatomy was associated with improvements in work habits and interpersonal attributes, particularly by the cohort of students who received the lowest mid-course feedback. Peer assessment offers students an opportunity to improve their interpersonal skills and work habits.
© 2013 American Association of Anatomists.

Keywords:  assessment; formative feedback; gross anatomy education; medical education; peer-assessment; professionalism; summative feedback

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23959790     DOI: 10.1002/ase.1394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  7 in total

Review 1.  Current Practices in Assessing Professionalism in United States and Canadian Allopathic Medical Students and Residents.

Authors:  Nandini Nittur; Jonathan Kibble
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-05-22

Review 2.  A review on considerations needed educating new physicians.

Authors:  A Alavi; N Amjadi
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2015

3.  Peer assessment of professionalism in undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  Vernon R Curran; Nicholas A Fairbridge; Diana Deacon
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Students as anatomy near-peer teachers: a double-edged sword for an ancient skill.

Authors:  Nomy Dickman; Alon Barash; Shmuel Reis; David Karasik
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 5.  Peer Feedback on Collaborative Learning Activities in Veterinary Education.

Authors:  Laura M Dooley; Nicholas J Bamford
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2018-10-17

6.  A comparison of peer and faculty narrative feedback on medical student oral research presentations.

Authors:  Tracey A H Taylor; Stephanie M Swanberg
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2020-09-30

Review 7.  Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review.

Authors:  Marie Stenberg; Elisabeth Mangrio; Mariette Bengtsson; Elisabeth Carlson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.