Literature DB >> 23959051

Impact of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial on clinical management of the axilla in older breast cancer patients: a SEER-medicare analysis.

Holly Caretta-Weyer, Caprice G Greenberg, Lee G Wilke, Jennifer Weiss, Noelle K LoConte, Marquita Decker, Nicole M Steffens, Maureen A Smith, Heather B Neuman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 demonstrated that eligible breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) could be spared an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) without sacrificing survival or local control. Although heralded as a ‘‘practice-changing trial,’’ some argue that the stringent inclusion criteria limit the trial’s clinical significance. The objective was to assess the potential impact of ACOSOG Z0011 on axillary surgical management of Medicare patients and examine current practice patterns.
METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries aged C66 years with nonmetastatic invasive breast cancer diagnosed from 2001 to 2007 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database (n = 59,431). Eligibility for ACOSOG Z0011 was determined: SLN mapping, tumor\5 cm, no neoadjuvant treatment, breast conservation; number of positive nodes was determined. Actual surgical axillary management for eligible patients was assessed.
RESULTS: Twelve percent (6,942/59,431) underwent SLN mapping and were node positive. Overall, 2,637 patients (4.4 % (2,637/59,431) of the total cohort, but 38 % (2,637/6,942) of patients with SLN mapping and positive nodes) met inclusion criteria for ACOSOG Z0011, had 1 or 2 positive lymph nodes, and could have been spared an ALND. Of these 2,637 patients, 46 % received a completion ALND and 54 % received only SLN biopsy.
CONCLUSIONS: Widespread implementation of ACOSOG Z0011 trial results could potentially spare 38 % of older breast cancer patients who undergo SLN mapping with positive lymph nodes an ALND. However, 54 % of these patients are already managed with SLN biopsy alone, lessening the impact of this trial on clinical practice in older breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23959051      PMCID: PMC3874252          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3193-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  30 in total

1.  Radiation field design and regional control in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients with omission of axillary dissection.

Authors:  Jeremy Setton; Hiram Cody; Lee Tan; Monica Morrow; Clifford Hudis; Jeffrey Catalano; Beryl McCormick; Simon Powell; Alice Ho
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  The post ACOSOG Z0011 era: does our new understanding of breast cancer really change clinical practice?

Authors:  U Güth; M E Myrick; C T Viehl; S M Schmid; E C Obermann; W P Weber
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  David N Krag; Stewart J Anderson; Thomas B Julian; Ann M Brown; Seth P Harlow; Joseph P Costantino; Takamaru Ashikaga; Donald L Weaver; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Lynne M Jalovec; Thomas G Frazier; R Dirk Noyes; André Robidoux; Hugh Mc Scarth; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Trends in and outcomes from sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone vs. SLNB with axillary lymph node dissection for node-positive breast cancer patients: experience from the SEER database.

Authors:  Min Yi; Sharon Hermes Giordano; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Henry M Kuerer; Rosa F Hwang; Isabelle Bedrosian; Loren Rourke; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Multidisciplinary considerations in the implementation of the findings from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 study: a practice-changing trial.

Authors:  Abigail S Caudle; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Anthony Lucci; Isabelle Bedrosian; Gildy V Babiera; Rosa F Hwang; Merrick I Ross; Barry W Feig; Karen Hoffman; Jennifer K Litton; Aysegul A Sahin; Wei Yang; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Thomas A Buchholz; Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Armando E Giuliano; Kelly K Hunt; Karla V Ballman; Peter D Beitsch; Pat W Whitworth; Peter W Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Linda M McCall; Monica Morrow
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011: impact on surgeon practice patterns.

Authors:  Abigail S Caudle; Kelly K Hunt; Susan L Tucker; Karen Hoffman; Sarah M Gainer; Anthony Lucci; Henry M Kuerer; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ruchita Shah; Gildy V Babiera; Aysegul A Sahin; Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in older patients with T1N0 breast cancer: 15-year results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Gabriele Martelli; Patrizia Boracchi; Ilaria Ardoino; Laura Lozza; Silvia Bohm; Gaetano Vetrella; Roberto Agresti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Outcome of selected breast cancer patients with micrometastasis or isolated tumor cells in sentinel node biopsy and no completion axillary lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Tuomo J Meretoja; Jaana H Vironen; Päivi S Heikkilä; Marjut H Leidenius
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Impact of the american college of surgeons oncology group Z0011 criteria applied to a contemporary patient population.

Authors:  Min Yi; Henry M Kuerer; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Rosa F Hwang; Abigail S Caudle; Isabelle Bedrosian; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Jamie L Wagner; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Is axillary lymph node clearance required in node-positive breast cancer?

Authors:  Nigel J Bundred; Nicola L P Barnes; Emiel Rutgers; Mila Donker
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  DEGRO practical guidelines: radiotherapy of breast cancer III--radiotherapy of the lymphatic pathways.

Authors:  M-L Sautter-Bihl; F Sedlmayer; W Budach; J Dunst; P Feyer; R Fietkau; C Fussl; W Haase; W Harms; M D Piroth; R Souchon; F Wenz; R Sauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Patterns of nodal staging during breast conservation surgery in the medicare patient: will the ACOSOG Z0011 trial change the pattern of care?

Authors:  Catherine E Loveland-Jones; Karen Ruth; Elin R Sigurdson; Brian L Egleston; Marcia Boraas; Richard J Bleicher
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Restricted Axillary Staging in Clinically and Sonographically Node-Negative Early Invasive Breast Cancer (c/iT1-2) in the Context of Breast Conserving Therapy: First Results Following Commencement of the Intergroup-Sentinel-Mamma (INSEMA) Trial.

Authors:  T Reimer; A Stachs; V Nekljudova; S Loibl; S Hartmann; K Wolter; G Hildebrandt; B Gerber
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.915

5.  Associations Between Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Complications for Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Brigid K Killelea; Jessica B Long; Weixiong Dang; Sarah S Mougalian; Suzanne B Evans; Cary P Gross; Shi-Yi Wang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Different outcome in node-positive breast cancer patients found by axillary ultrasound or sentinel node procedure.

Authors:  Nicole C Verheuvel; Adri C Voogd; Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen; S Siesling; Rudi M H Roumen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  The Evolving Role of Marked Lymph Node Biopsy (MLNB) and Targeted Axillary Dissection (TAD) after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) for Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

Authors:  Parinita K Swarnkar; Salim Tayeh; Michael J Michell; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Long-Term Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.

Authors:  Peiyin Hung; Shi-Yi Wang; Brigid K Killelea; Sarah S Mougalian; Suzanne B Evans; Tannaz Sedghi; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2019-08-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.