Literature DB >> 23955421

Fusion and subsidence rate of stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using PEEK cage with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.

Eyal Behrbalk1, Ofir Uri, Ruth M Parks, Rachel Musson, Reuben Chee Cheong Soh, Bronek Maximilian Boszczyk.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is an established treatment for structural instability associated with symptomatic disk degeneration (SDD). Stand-alone ALIF offers many advantages, however, it may increase the risk of non-union. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) may enhance fusion rate but is associated with postoperative complication. The optimal dose of BMP-2 remains unclear. This study assessed the fusion and subsidence rates of stand-alone ALIF using the SynFix-LR interbody cage with 6 ml/level of BMP-2.
METHODS: Thirty-two ALIF procedures were performed by a single surgeon in 25 patients. Twenty-five procedures were performed for SDD without spondylolisthesis (SDD group) and seven procedures were performed for SDD with grade-I olisthesis (SDD-olisthesis group). Patients were followed-up for a mean of 17 ± 6 months.
RESULTS: Solid fusion was achieved in 29 cases (90.6 %) within 6 months postoperatively. Five cases of implant subsidence were observed (16 %). Four of these occurred in the SDD-olisthesis group and one occurred in the SDD group (57 % vs. 4 % respectively; p = 0.004). Three cases of subsidence failed to fuse and required revision. The body mass index of patients with olisthesis who developed subsidence was higher than those who did not develop subsidence (29 ± 2.6 vs. 22 ± 6.5 respectively; p = 0.04). No BMP-2 related complications occurred.
CONCLUSION: The overall fusion rate of stand-alone ALIF using the SynFix-LR system with BMP-2 was 90.6 %, comparable with other published series. No BMP-2 related complication occurred at a dose of 6 mg/level. Degenerative spondylolisthesis and obesity seemed to increase the rate of implant subsidence, and thus we believe that adding posterior fusion for these cases should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23955421      PMCID: PMC3843805          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2948-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  42 in total

1.  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2 with tapered interbody cages.

Authors:  J Kenneth Burkus; Matthew F Gornet; Curtis A Dickman; Thomas A Zdeblick
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2002-10

Review 2.  CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: current concepts.

Authors:  Alan L Williams; Matthew F Gornet; J Kenneth Burkus
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  A new stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established fixation techniques.

Authors:  Christopher M J Cain; Philip Schleicher; Rene Gerlach; Robert Pflugmacher; Matti Scholz; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Anterior interbody lumbar spine fusion. Analysis of Mayo Clinic series.

Authors:  R N Stauffer; M B Coventry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Stand-alone anterior versus anteroposterior lumbar interbody single-level fusion after a mean follow-up of 41 months.

Authors:  Patrick Strube; Eike Hoff; Tony Hartwig; Carsten F Perka; Christian Gross; Michael Putzier
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2012-10

6.  Complications with recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 in posterolateral spine fusion: a consecutive series of 1037 cases.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Jennifer Howard; John Dimar; Alexander Sweet; Greg Wilson; Leah Carreon
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Interbody fusion with allograft and rhBMP-2 leads to consistent fusion but early subsidence.

Authors:  R Vaidya; R Weir; A Sethi; S Meisterling; W Hakeos; C D Wybo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-03

8.  Six-year outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis with use of interbody fusion cages and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.

Authors:  J Kenneth Burkus; Matthew F Gornet; Thomas C Schuler; Thomas J Kleeman; Thomas A Zdeblick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Systematic review of lumbar discography as a diagnostic test for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Scott E Glaser; Lee Wolfer; Richard Derby; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Influence of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation: a study of pedicle screw fixation augmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients.

Authors:  K Okuyama; E Abe; T Suzuki; Y Tamura; M Chiba; K Sato
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  23 in total

1.  Trends analysis of rhBMP utilization in single-level posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) in the United States.

Authors:  Lifeng Lao; Jeremiah R Cohen; Elizabeth L Lord; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cyst-Like Osteolytic Formations in Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (rhBMP-2) Augmented Sheep Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Hsin Chuan Pan; Soonchul Lee; Kang Ting; Jia Shen; Chenchao Wang; Alan Nguyen; Emily A Berthiaume; Janette N Zara; A Simon Turner; Howard B Seim; Jin Hee Kwak; Xinli Zhang; Chia Soo
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Lumbar interbody fusion with utilization of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein: a retrospective real-life study about 277 patients.

Authors:  Stéphane Litrico; Tristan Langlais; Florent Pennes; Antoine Gennari; Philippe Paquis
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: who should be fused? An updated review.

Authors:  Farzad Omidi-Kashani; Ebrahim Ghayem Hasankhani; Amir Ashjazadeh
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-08-19

5.  Interbody Spacer Material Properties and Design Conformity for Reducing Subsidence During Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Lillian S Chatham; Vikas V Patel; Christopher M Yakacki; R Dana Carpenter
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Arthrodesis Rate and Patient Reported Outcomes After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Utilizing a Plasma-Sprayed Titanium Coated PEEK Interbody Implant: A Retrospective, Observational Analysis.

Authors:  Joseph A Sclafani; Sophea R Bergen; Miranda Staples; Kevin Liang; Ramin Raiszadeh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-01-13

7.  Subsidence following anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): a prospective study.

Authors:  Prashanth J Rao; Kevin Phan; Gloria Giang; Monish M Maharaj; Steven Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

8.  Anterior stand-alone fusion revisited: a prospective clinical, X-ray and CT investigation.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Katrin Stosch-Wiechert; Franziska Heider; Phat Amnajtrakul; Alexander Krenauer; Wolfgang Hitzl; Ulrike Szeimies; Axel Stäbler; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Radiological evaluation of anterior lumbar fusion using PEEK cages with adjacent vertebral autograft in spinal deformity long fusion surgeries.

Authors:  Jianqiang Ni; Yanping Zheng; Ning Liu; Xin Wang; Xiutong Fang; Rishabh Phukan; Kirkham B Wood
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Access-related complications in anterior lumbar surgery in patients over 60 years of age.

Authors:  Dominique A Rothenfluh; Matthias Koenig; Oliver M Stokes; Eyal Behrbalk; Bronek M Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.