Literature DB >> 23955353

From glue to gasoline: how competition turns perspective takers unethical.

Jason R Pierce1, Gavin J Kilduff, Adam D Galinsky, Niro Sivanathan.   

Abstract

Perspective taking is often the glue that binds people together. However, we propose that in competitive contexts, perspective taking is akin to adding gasoline to a fire: It inflames already-aroused competitive impulses and leads people to protect themselves from the potentially insidious actions of their competitors. Overall, we suggest that perspective taking functions as a relational amplifier. In cooperative contexts, it creates the foundation for prosocial impulses, but in competitive contexts, it triggers hypercompetition, leading people to prophylactically engage in unethical behavior to prevent themselves from being exploited. The experiments reported here establish that perspective taking interacts with the relational context--cooperative or competitive--to predict unethical behavior, from using insidious negotiation tactics to materially deceiving one's partner to cheating on an anagram task. In the context of competition, perspective taking can pervert the age-old axiom "do unto others as you would have them do unto you" into "do unto others as you think they will try to do unto you."

Entities:  

Keywords:  interpersonal interaction; morality; social behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23955353     DOI: 10.1177/0956797613482144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  9 in total

1.  Reliability of the empathy selection task, a novel behavioral measure of empathy avoidance.

Authors:  Amanda M Ferguson; Michael Inzlicht
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-08-22

2.  Wise reasoning, intergroup positivity, and attitude polarization across contexts.

Authors:  Justin P Brienza; Franki Y H Kung; Melody M Chao
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 3.  Disrupting the "empathy machine": The power and perils of virtual reality in addressing social issues.

Authors:  Carles Sora-Domenjó
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-26

4.  Empathy and correct mental state inferences both promote prosociality.

Authors:  Konrad Lehmann; Anne Böckler; Olga Klimecki; Christian Müller-Liebmann; Philipp Kanske
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Social Hostility in Soccer and Beyond.

Authors:  Niels J Van Doesum; Jan-Willem Van Prooijen; Lot Verburgh; Paul A M Van Lange
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Building long-term empathy: A large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking.

Authors:  Fernanda Herrera; Jeremy Bailenson; Erika Weisz; Elise Ogle; Jamil Zaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The enemy's gaze: Immersive virtual environments enhance peace promoting attitudes and emotions in violent intergroup conflicts.

Authors:  Yossi Hasson; Noa Schori-Eyal; Daniel Landau; Béatrice S Hasler; Jonathan Levy; Doron Friedman; Eran Halperin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  In-Organization Ethics Power-Allocation Mechanisms and Members' Decision-Making Behavior.

Authors:  Yudan Pang; Xuefeng Wang; Hang Wu; Fanfan Zhang
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-28

9.  The Effect of Social Perspective-Taking on Interpersonal Trust Under the Cooperative and Competitive Contexts: The Mediating Role of Benevolence.

Authors:  Binghai Sun; Xiajun Yu; Xuhui Yuan; Changkang Sun; Weijian Li
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2021-06-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.