Literature DB >> 23954325

An in vitro study on the maturation of conventional glass ionomer cements and their interface to dentin.

Julius Zoergiebel1, Nicoleta Ilie.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to investigate the influence of long-term storage (up to 1 year) and coating on the variation of micro-mechanical properties of four conventional restorative glass ionomer cements (GICs) within 3.5 mm deep class I cavities. Four commercially available GICs (Riva Self Cure (SDI), ChemFil Rock (Dentsply), Fuji IX Fast and Fuji IX GP Extra/Equia (GC)) were applied to 100 teeth. In each tooth, two similar 3.5 mm deep class I cavities were prepared and filled with the GICs, with and without resin coating. The samples were stored in artificial saliva at 37 °C for 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year. The variation in mechanical properties (indentation modulus (E) and Vickers hardness (HV)) were determined in 100 μm steps starting from the filling surface, through the intermediate layer in between dentine and GIC, and ending 100 μm in dentin. HV and E were strongly influenced by the material (P<0.05, partial eta-squared ηP(2) = 0.31 and 0.23) but less by aging duration (P<0.05, ηP(2) = 0.02 and 0.12) and resin coating (P<0.05, ηP(2) = 0.02 and 0.03). The depth of measurement (0-2 mm) has no influence on HV (P = 0.789). HV shows a gentle increase over the 1 year storage period (P = 0.002). A ∼300 μm GIC zone at the areas close to dentin with weaker properties as those measured in dentin or GIC was identified in all fillings, irrespective of the presence of coating, and at all storage periods. The thickness of this zone is more strongly influenced by storage (P<0.05, ηP(2) = 0.081) than by material type (P<0.05, ηP(2) = 0.056), while coating showed no influence (P = 0.869). Filler morphology and dimension were similar to upper parts of the GIC filling; however, the amount of low cations was higher. We concluded that the development of an intermediate layer in between dentine and GIC with lower mechanical properties might be responsible for the bond quality of GIC to dentine. Moreover, class I GIC restorations are unlikely to feature constant mechanical properties throughout the cavity, regardless of conditions such as aging and coating.
Copyright © 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; GIC–dentin interface; Glass ionomer cement; Hardness; Indentation modulus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23954325     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  4 in total

1.  The effect of resin coating on the shear punch strength of restorative glass ionomer cements.

Authors:  Raphael Pilo; Ariel Ben-Amar; Anna Barnea; Yaron Blasbalg; Shifra Levartovsky
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Evaluation on shear bond strength of different glass ionomer and hydroxy apatite cements used in ossiculoplasty.

Authors:  M Tayyar Kalcıoğlu; İsmail Hakkı Uzun; Muhammet Yalçın; Meral Arslan Malkoç; Ayşe Tuba Öğreten; Fatih Mehmet Hanege
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.021

3.  Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to different tooth substrates; microshear bond strength and scanning electron microscope study.

Authors:  Aliaa Mohamed El Wakeel; Dina Wafik Elkassas; Mai Mahmoud Yousry
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

4.  Clinical performance during 48 months of two current glass ionomer restorative systems with coatings: a randomized clinical trial in the field.

Authors:  Thomas Klinke; Amro Daboul; Anita Turek; Roland Frankenberger; Reinhard Hickel; Reiner Biffar
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.