Felipe A Medeiros1, Renato Lisboa2, Linda M Zangwill2, Jeffrey M Liebmann3, Christopher A Girkin4, Christopher Bowd2, Robert N Weinreb2. 1. Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, California. Electronic address: fmedeiros@glaucoma.ucsd.edu. 2. Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, California. 3. New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, New York. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the validity of using progressive loss of neuroretinal rim area as a surrogate end point for the development of visual field loss in glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The study group included 492 eyes of 328 patients classified with suspected glaucoma at the baseline visit. These eyes had an average of 7.4±2.8 confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) images during a mean follow-up time of 6.6±1.6 years. METHODS: Rim area measurements were acquired with CSLO during follow-up. The visual field end point was considered the development of 3 consecutive abnormal visual fields on standard automated perimetry. Strong predictive ability and large proportion of treatment effect (PTE) explained are requisites for a suitable surrogate end point. A joint longitudinal survival model was used to evaluate the ability of rates of rim area loss in predicting visual field development, adjusting for confounding variables (baseline age, race, and corneal thickness and follow-up measurements of intraocular pressure [IOP] and pattern standard deviation). The PTE was calculated by comparing the effect of IOP on the risk of development of visual field loss when incorporating rim area loss in the same model with the effect of IOP in the model excluding rim area measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predictive strength was measured by survival-adapted R(2) and PTE. RESULTS: Sixty-two of 492 eyes (13%) developed visual field loss during follow-up. The mean rate of rim area change in eyes that developed visual field loss was -0.011 mm(2)/year versus -0.003 mm(2)/year in eyes that did not (P<0.001). In the multivariable model, each 0.01 mm(2)/year faster rate of rim area loss was associated with a 2.94 higher risk of visual field loss (hazard ratio, 2.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-6.23; P = 0.005). R(2) values were 62% and 81% for univariable and multivariable models, respectively. The PTE was 65%. CONCLUSIONS: Progressive rim area loss was highly predictive of the development of visual field loss in glaucoma and explained a significant PTE on the clinically relevant outcome. These findings suggest that rim area measurements may be suitable surrogate end points in glaucoma clinical trials.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the validity of using progressive loss of neuroretinal rim area as a surrogate end point for the development of visual field loss in glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The study group included 492 eyes of 328 patients classified with suspected glaucoma at the baseline visit. These eyes had an average of 7.4±2.8 confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) images during a mean follow-up time of 6.6±1.6 years. METHODS: Rim area measurements were acquired with CSLO during follow-up. The visual field end point was considered the development of 3 consecutive abnormal visual fields on standard automated perimetry. Strong predictive ability and large proportion of treatment effect (PTE) explained are requisites for a suitable surrogate end point. A joint longitudinal survival model was used to evaluate the ability of rates of rim area loss in predicting visual field development, adjusting for confounding variables (baseline age, race, and corneal thickness and follow-up measurements of intraocular pressure [IOP] and pattern standard deviation). The PTE was calculated by comparing the effect of IOP on the risk of development of visual field loss when incorporating rim area loss in the same model with the effect of IOP in the model excluding rim area measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predictive strength was measured by survival-adapted R(2) and PTE. RESULTS: Sixty-two of 492 eyes (13%) developed visual field loss during follow-up. The mean rate of rim area change in eyes that developed visual field loss was -0.011 mm(2)/year versus -0.003 mm(2)/year in eyes that did not (P<0.001). In the multivariable model, each 0.01 mm(2)/year faster rate of rim area loss was associated with a 2.94 higher risk of visual field loss (hazard ratio, 2.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-6.23; P = 0.005). R(2) values were 62% and 81% for univariable and multivariable models, respectively. The PTE was 65%. CONCLUSIONS: Progressive rim area loss was highly predictive of the development of visual field loss in glaucoma and explained a significant PTE on the clinically relevant outcome. These findings suggest that rim area measurements may be suitable surrogate end points in glaucoma clinical trials.
Authors: Lyne Racette; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Linda M Zangwill; Sonia Jain; Lida M Becerra; Felipe A Medeiros; Christopher Bowd; Robert N Weinreb; Catherine Boden; Pamela A Sample Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2010-05
Authors: Christopher A Girkin; Pamela A Sample; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Sonia Jain; Christopher Bowd; Lida M Becerra; Felipe A Medeiros; Lyne Racette; Keri A Dirkes; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2010-05
Authors: Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Kaweh Mansouri; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Richard A Russell; Rizwan Malik; Balwantray C Chauhan; David P Crabb; David F Garway-Heath Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-05-14 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Lin He; Hongli Yang; Stuart K Gardiner; Galen Williams; Christy Hardin; Nicholas G Strouthidis; Brad Fortune; Claude F Burgoyne Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-01-29 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Hongli Yang; Lin He; Stuart K Gardiner; Juan Reynaud; Galen Williams; Christy Hardin; Nicholas G Strouthidis; J Crawford Downs; Brad Fortune; Claude F Burgoyne Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-09-04 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Alberto Diniz-Filho; Ricardo Y Abe; Linda M Zangwill; Carolina P B Gracitelli; Robert N Weinreb; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Felipe A Medeiros Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-08-20 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ting Liu; Andrew J Tatham; Carolina P B Gracitelli; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Felipe A Medeiros Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Daniel Meira-Freitas; Andrew J Tatham; Renato Lisboa; Tung-Mei Kuang; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Felipe A Medeiros Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Na'ama Hammel; Akram Belghith; Christopher Bowd; Felipe A Medeiros; Lucie Sharpsten; Nadia Mendoza; Andrew J Tatham; Naira Khachatryan; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 12.079