OBJECTIVE: The reliability and validity of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) has not been examined while taking into account the correlation between subscales. The reliability of the EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales is modest, thus limiting their utility in both clinical and research settings. The purpose of this study was to validate the factor structure of multiple-item subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and to improve their reliability by means of an item response analysis by using the multidimensional partial credit model. METHODS: A total of 2295 patients with complete data were used for the analysis. One- and nine-dimensional partial credit models were used to fit the data to validate the construct validity of the multiple-item subscales of the QLQ-C30. RESULTS: The model comparison showed that the nine-dimensional factor structure of multiple-item subscales was satisfactory. The multidimensional partial credit model fit data of the multiple-item subscales of the QLQ-C30 reasonably well. The estimated test reliabilities of each domain obtained from the multidimensional approach were higher than those obtained from the unidimensional approach. CONCLUSIONS: The constructs represented by the multiple-item subscales of the QLQ-C30 were validated. The improved reliability of the multiple-item subscales of the QLQ-C30 under the multidimensional approach can facilitate their applications in clinical and research settings.
OBJECTIVE: The reliability and validity of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) has not been examined while taking into account the correlation between subscales. The reliability of the EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales is modest, thus limiting their utility in both clinical and research settings. The purpose of this study was to validate the factor structure of multiple-item subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and to improve their reliability by means of an item response analysis by using the multidimensional partial credit model. METHODS: A total of 2295 patients with complete data were used for the analysis. One- and nine-dimensional partial credit models were used to fit the data to validate the construct validity of the multiple-item subscales of the QLQ-C30. RESULTS: The model comparison showed that the nine-dimensional factor structure of multiple-item subscales was satisfactory. The multidimensional partial credit model fit data of the multiple-item subscales of the QLQ-C30 reasonably well. The estimated test reliabilities of each domain obtained from the multidimensional approach were higher than those obtained from the unidimensional approach. CONCLUSIONS: The constructs represented by the multiple-item subscales of the QLQ-C30 were validated. The improved reliability of the multiple-item subscales of the QLQ-C30 under the multidimensional approach can facilitate their applications in clinical and research settings.
Authors: Tim Staudenmaier; Irena Cenzer; Alexander Crispin; Helmut Ostermann; Karin Berger Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-12-02 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Mark de Mol; Sabine Visser; Joachim G J V Aerts; Paul Lodder; Jolanda de Vries; Brenda L den Oudsten Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Johannes M Giesinger; Wilma Kuijpers; Teresa Young; Krzysztof A Tomaszewski; Elizabeth Friend; August Zabernigg; Bernhard Holzner; Neil K Aaronson Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Lisa Ljungman; Johan Ahlgren; Lena-Marie Petersson; Kathryn E Flynn; Kevin Weinfurt; Jessica R Gorman; Lena Wettergren; Claudia Lampic Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2018-09-27 Impact factor: 3.894