Literature DB >> 23946864

Speech perception and production.

Elizabeth D Casserly1, David B Pisoni2.   

Abstract

Until recently, research in speech perception and speech production has largely focused on the search for psychological and phonetic evidence of discrete, abstract, context-free symbolic units corresponding to phonological segments or phonemes. Despite this common conceptual goal and intimately related objects of study, however, research in these two domains of speech communication has progressed more or less independently for more than 60 years. In this article, we present an overview of the foundational works and current trends in the two fields, specifically discussing the progress made in both lines of inquiry as well as the basic fundamental issues that neither has been able to resolve satisfactorily so far. We then discuss theoretical models and recent experimental evidence that point to the deep, pervasive connections between speech perception and production. We conclude that although research focusing on each domain individually has been vital in increasing our basic understanding of spoken language processing, the human capacity for speech communication is so complex that gaining a full understanding will not be possible until speech perception and production are conceptually reunited in a joint approach to problems shared by both modes.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 23946864      PMCID: PMC3740754          DOI: 10.1002/wcs.63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1939-5078


  34 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN.

Authors:  P A Luce; S D Goldinger; E T Auer; M S Vitevitch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

Review 3.  Speech perception.

Authors:  Randy L Diehl; Andrew J Lotto; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.

Authors:  A M LIBERMAN; K S HARRIS; H S HOFFMAN; B C GRIFFITH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-11

5.  Electromagnetic midsagittal articulometer systems for transducing speech articulatory movements.

Authors:  J S Perkell; M H Cohen; M A Svirsky; M L Matthies; I Garabieta; M T Jackson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Three-dimensional tongue surface shapes of English consonants and vowels.

Authors:  M Stone; A Lundberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Listening with eye and hand: cross-modal contributions to speech perception.

Authors:  C A Fowler; D J Dekle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The interconversion of audible and visible patterns as a basis for research in the perception of speech.

Authors:  F S COOPER; A M LIBERMAN; J M BORST
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1951-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production.

Authors:  J F Houde; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The motor theory of speech perception revised.

Authors:  A M Liberman; I G Mattingly
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-10
View more
  7 in total

1.  Sensorimotor adaptation affects perceptual compensation for coarticulation.

Authors:  William L Schuerman; Srikantan Nagarajan; James M McQueen; John Houde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Do We Perceive Others Better than Ourselves? A Perceptual Benefit for Noise-Vocoded Speech Produced by an Average Speaker.

Authors:  William L Schuerman; Antje Meyer; James M McQueen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  What Makes Lexical Tone Special: A Reverse Accessing Model for Tonal Speech Perception.

Authors:  Xiang Gao; Ting-Ting Yan; Ding-Lan Tang; Ting Huang; Hua Shu; Yun Nan; Yu-Xuan Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-18

4.  Auditory feedback of one's own voice is used for high-level semantic monitoring: the "self-comprehension" hypothesis.

Authors:  Andreas Lind; Lars Hall; Björn Breidegard; Christian Balkenius; Petter Johansson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Making myself understood: perceived factors affecting the intelligibility of sung text.

Authors:  Philip A Fine; Jane Ginsborg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-04

6.  Effects of stimulus duration and vowel quality in cross-linguistic categorical perception of pitch directions.

Authors:  Si Chen; Yiqing Zhu; Ratree Wayland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Different languages, similar encoding efficiency: Comparable information rates across the human communicative niche.

Authors:  Christophe Coupé; Yoon Mi Oh; Dan Dediu; François Pellegrino
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 14.136

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.