STUDY OBJECTIVES: This double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of modafinil for treating excessive daytime sleepiness in Japanese patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). METHODS:Patients with residual excessive sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS] ≥ 11) on optimal nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) therapy (apnea-hypopnea index ≤ 10) were randomized to either 200 mg modafinil (n = 52) or placebo (n = 62) once daily for 4 weeks. Outcomes included baseline-week 4 changes in ESS total score, sleep latency on maintenance of wakefulness test (SL-MWT), nocturnal polysomnography, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and safety. RESULTS:All 114 randomized patients completed the study. Mean change in ESS total score (-6.6 vs -2.4, p < 0.001) and SL-MWT (+2.8 vs -0.4 minutes, p = 0.009) were significantly greater with modafinil than with placebo. ESS total score decreased from > 11 to < 11 at the final assessment in 69.2% of modafinil-treated patients and 30.6% of placebo-treated patients (p < 0.001). Corresponding rates at week 1 were 57.7% and 33.9% (p = 0.014). Changes in nocturnal polysomnography, PSQI, and apnea-hypopnea index from baseline to the final assessment were similar in both groups. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 36.5% and 22.6% of patients in the modafinil and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.146). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily modafinil was effective and well tolerated for managing residual daytime sleepiness in Japanese OSAS patients with residual excessive daytime sleepiness on optimal nCPAP therapy.
RCT Entities:
STUDY OBJECTIVES: This double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of modafinil for treating excessive daytime sleepiness in Japanese patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). METHODS:Patients with residual excessive sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS] ≥ 11) on optimal nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) therapy (apnea-hypopnea index ≤ 10) were randomized to either 200 mg modafinil (n = 52) or placebo (n = 62) once daily for 4 weeks. Outcomes included baseline-week 4 changes in ESS total score, sleep latency on maintenance of wakefulness test (SL-MWT), nocturnal polysomnography, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and safety. RESULTS: All 114 randomized patients completed the study. Mean change in ESS total score (-6.6 vs -2.4, p < 0.001) and SL-MWT (+2.8 vs -0.4 minutes, p = 0.009) were significantly greater with modafinil than with placebo. ESS total score decreased from > 11 to < 11 at the final assessment in 69.2% of modafinil-treated patients and 30.6% of placebo-treated patients (p < 0.001). Corresponding rates at week 1 were 57.7% and 33.9% (p = 0.014). Changes in nocturnal polysomnography, PSQI, and apnea-hypopnea index from baseline to the final assessment were similar in both groups. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 36.5% and 22.6% of patients in the modafinil and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.146). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily modafinil was effective and well tolerated for managing residual daytime sleepiness in Japanese OSAS patients with residual excessive daytime sleepiness on optimal nCPAP therapy.
Authors: Surendra K Sharma; Vishwa Mohan Katoch; Alladi Mohan; T Kadhiravan; A Elavarasi; R Ragesh; Neeraj Nischal; Prayas Sethi; D Behera; Manvir Bhatia; A G Ghoshal; Dipti Gothi; Jyotsna Joshi; M S Kanwar; O P Kharbanda; Suresh Kumar; P R Mohapatra; B N Mallick; Ravindra Mehta; Rajendra Prasad; S C Sharma; Kapil Sikka; Sandeep Aggarwal; Garima Shukla; J C Suri; B Vengamma; Ashoo Grover; V K Vijayan; N Ramakrishnan; Rasik Gupta Journal: Lung India Date: 2015 Jul-Aug
Authors: Surendra K Sharma; Vishwa Mohan Katoch; Alladi Mohan; T Kadhiravan; A Elavarasi; R Ragesh; Neeraj Nischal; Prayas Sethi; D Behera; Manvir Bhatia; A G Ghoshal; Dipti Gothi; Jyotsna Joshi; M S Kanwar; O P Kharbanda; Suresh Kumar; P R Mohapatra; B N Mallick; Ravindra Mehta; Rajendra Prasad; S C Sharma; Kapil Sikka; Sandeep Aggarwal; Garima Shukla; J C Suri; B Vengamma; Ashoo Grover; V K Vijayan; N Ramakrishnan; Rasik Gupta Journal: Indian J Med Res Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 2.375