Literature DB >> 23946621

Comparison of adverse events and hospital length of stay associated with various amphotericin B formulations: sequential conventional amphotericin b/lipid versus lipid-only therapy for the treatment of invasive fungal infections in hospitalized patients.

Rolin L Wade1, Paresh Chaudhari, Jaime L Natoli, Robert J Taylor, Brian H Nathanson, David Horn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with invasive fungal infections are often treated initially with conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate (CAB), followed by a switch to lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B (LF-AMB). Our study examined adverse events and hospital length of stay (LOS) among adults who received LF-AMB exclusively or CAB followed by LF-AMB (CAB/LF-AMB).
METHODS: Data were extracted from the Cerner Health Facts database. The study included adults with evidence of infection by Aspergillus, Candida, or Cryptococcus in addition to either renal insufficiency, a clinical condition suggesting intolerance to CAB, or CAB exposure within 90 days of admission. Nephrotoxicity was defined as a serum creatinine (SCr) level exceeding a 100% increase from baseline and an absolute level above 1.2 mg/dL. We used a hierarchical mixed-effect logistic regression model with nephrotoxicity as the outcome for the multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: The study included 327 LF-AMB and 81 CAB/LF-AMB patients with similar demographics and baseline SCr values. The mean pre-to-post percentage increase in SCr levels was greater for CAB/LF-AMB (122.9%) compared with LF-AMB (62.2%) (P < 0.001). The multivariate-adjusted odds ratio of nephrotoxicity was 5.93, for a 95% confidence interval of 2.92 to 12.05 (P < 0.001) for CAB/LF-AMB compared with LF-AMB. Hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, and infusion-related reactions were more frequent with CAB/LF-AMB. Compared with the LF-AMB group, the CAB/LF-AMB patients had a longer post-amphotericin B LOS (24.1 days vs. 15.7 days, respectively; P < 0.001), with a marginal effect of 4.5 days longer for those receiving CAB/LF-AMB (P = 0.016).
CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, we noted a significantly longer post-amphotericin B LOS and a greater frequency of adverse events, including nephrotoxicity, for patients whose initial treatment was CAB and who were switched to LF-AMB, compared with patients who received LF-AMB only.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse events; amphotericin B; hospital length of stay; invasive fungal infections; nephrotoxicity

Year:  2013        PMID: 23946621      PMCID: PMC3737979     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  P T        ISSN: 1052-1372


  30 in total

1.  Mortality and costs of acute renal failure associated with amphotericin B therapy.

Authors:  D W Bates; L Su; D T Yu; G M Chertow; D L Seger; D R Gomes; E J Dasbach; R Platt
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-02-21       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Reduction of nephrotoxicity associated with amphotericin B deoxycholate.

Authors:  James R Johnson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Continuous infusion of amphotericin B deoxycholate: a cost-effective gold standard for therapy of invasive fungal infections?

Authors:  Markus Schneemann; Esther B Bachli
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Risk factors for Amphotericin B-associated nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  M A Fisher; G H Talbot; G Maislin; B P McKeon; K P Tynan; B L Strom
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 5.  Amphotericin B nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  Gilbert Deray
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Risk factors for amphotericin B-induced nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  A D Luber; L Maa; M Lam; B J Guglielmo
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Correlates of acute renal failure in patients receiving parenteral amphotericin B.

Authors:  D W Bates; L Su; D T Yu; G M Chertow; D L Seger; D R Gomes; R Platt
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  A randomized, double-blind comparative trial evaluating the safety of liposomal amphotericin B versus amphotericin B lipid complex in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia. L Amph/ABLC Collaborative Study Group.

Authors:  J R Wingard; M H White; E Anaissie; J Raffalli; J Goodman; A Arrieta
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 9.  Amphotericin B: 30 years of clinical experience.

Authors:  H A Gallis; R H Drew; W W Pickard
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr

10.  Amphotericin B revisited: reassessment of toxicity.

Authors:  J S Clements; J E Peacock
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  4 in total

1.  Local delivery polymer provides sustained antifungal activity of amphotericin B with reduced cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Rebecca M Haley; Sean T Zuckerman; Catherine A Gormley; Julius N Korley; Horst A von Recum
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-03-21

2.  Adverse effects of amphotericin B in children; a retrospective comparison of conventional and liposomal formulations.

Authors:  Eden C Andrew; Nigel Curtis; Ben Coghlan; Noel Cranswick; Amanda Gwee
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Potential Use of Alginate-Based Carriers As Antifungal Delivery System.

Authors:  Cristina de Castro Spadari; Luciana B Lopes; Kelly Ishida
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 4.  An overview of diagnosis and management of drug-induced hypomagnesemia.

Authors:  George Liamis; Ewout J Hoorn; Matilda Florentin; Haralampos Milionis
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2021-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.