Literature DB >> 23946472

Gleason grade progression is uncommon.

Kathryn L Penney1, Meir J Stampfer, Jaquelyn L Jahn, Jennifer A Sinnott, Richard Flavin, Jennifer R Rider, Stephen Finn, Edward Giovannucci, Howard D Sesso, Massimo Loda, Lorelei A Mucci, Michelangelo Fiorentino.   

Abstract

Gleason grade is universally used for pathologic scoring of the differentiation of prostate cancer. However, it is unknown whether prostate tumors arise well differentiated and then progress to less differentiated forms or if Gleason grade is an early and largely unchanging feature. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has reduced the proportion of tumors diagnosed at advanced stage, which allows assessment of this question on a population level. If Gleason grade progresses as stage does, one would expect a similar reduction in high-grade tumors. We studied 1,207 Physicians' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study participants diagnosed with prostate cancer from 1982 to 2004 and treated with prostatectomy. We compared the distribution of grade and clinical stage across the pre-PSA and PSA screening eras. We re-reviewed grade using the ISUP 2005 revised criteria. The proportion of advanced stage tumors dropped more than six-fold, from the earliest period (12/1982-1/1993), 19.9% stage ≥ T3, to the latest (5/2000-12/2004), 3% stage T3, none T4. The proportion of Gleason score ≥ 8 decreased substantially less, from 25.3% to 17.6%. A significant interaction between stage and diagnosis date predicting grade (P = 0.04) suggests that the relationship between grade and stage varies by time period. As the dramatic shift in stage since the introduction of PSA screening was accompanied by a more modest shift in Gleason grade, these findings suggest that grade may be established early in tumor pathogenesis. This has implications for the understanding of tumor progression and prognosis, and may help patients diagnosed with lower grade disease feel more comfortable choosing active surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23946472      PMCID: PMC3775342          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  25 in total

1.  Declining rates of extracapsular extension after radical prostatectomy: evidence for continued stage migration.

Authors:  F M Jhaveri; E A Klein; P A Kupelian; C Zippe; H S Levin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon.

Authors:  Peter C Albertsen; James A Hanley; George H Barrows; David F Penson; Pam D H Kowalczyk; M Melinda Sanders; Judith Fine
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Gleason score, age and screening: modeling dedifferentiation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gerrit Draisma; Renske Postma; Fritz H Schröder; Theo H van der Kwast; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Dedifferentiation of prostate cancer grade with time in men followed expectantly for stage T1c disease.

Authors:  J I Epstein; P C Walsh; H B Carter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Final report on the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians' Health Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Continuing trends in pathological stage migration in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Ithaar H Derweesh; Patrick A Kupelian; Craig Zippe; Howard S Levin; Jennifer Brainard; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Jonathan Myles; Alwyn M Reuther; Eric A Klein
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  How well does the Gleason score predict prostate cancer death? A 20-year followup of a population based cohort in Sweden.

Authors:  Ove Andrén; Katja Fall; Lennart Franzén; Swen-Olof Andersson; Jan-Erik Johansson; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jan-Erik Johansson; Ove Andrén; Swen-Olof Andersson; Paul W Dickman; Lars Holmberg; Anders Magnuson; Hans-Olov Adami
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Evidence to support a continued stage migration and decrease in prostate cancer specific mortality.

Authors:  Shira L Galper; Ming-Hui Chen; William J Catalona; Kimberly A Roehl; Jerome P Richie; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Lineage relationship of Gleason patterns in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Irina V Kovtun; John C Cheville; Stephen J Murphy; Sarah H Johnson; Shabnam Zarei; Farhad Kosari; William R Sukov; R Jeffrey Karnes; George Vasmatzis
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  Cancer stem cells, cancer cell plasticity and radiation therapy.

Authors:  Erina Vlashi; Frank Pajonk
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 15.707

2.  Initial experience with electronic tracking of specific tumor sites in men undergoing active surveillance of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Sonn; Christopher P Filson; Edward Chang; Shyam Natarajan; Daniel J Margolis; Malu Macairan; Patricia Lieu; Jiaoti Huang; Frederick J Dorey; Robert E Reiter; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 3.  Nanoways to overcome docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Aditya Ganju; Murali M Yallapu; Sheema Khan; Stephen W Behrman; Subhash C Chauhan; Meena Jaggi
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 18.500

Review 4.  Role of steroid receptor and coregulator mutations in hormone-dependent cancers.

Authors:  Anna C Groner; Myles Brown
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  The Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer in Everyday Practice in Germany.

Authors:  Jan Herden; Lena Ansmann; Nicole Ernstmann; Dietrich Schnell; Lotharh Weißbac
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Pathologic correlation of transperineal in-bore 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy samples with radical prostatectomy specimen.

Authors:  Erik Velez; Andriy Fedorov; Kemal Tuncali; Olutayo Olubiyi; Christopher B Allard; Adam S Kibel; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-08

Review 7.  Does true Gleason pattern 3 merit its cancer descriptor?

Authors:  Saiful Miah; Hashim U Ahmed; Alex Freeman; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Molecular Profiling to Determine Clonality of Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsies from Men on Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ganesh S Palapattu; Simpa S Salami; Andi K Cani; Daniel H Hovelson; Lorena Lazo de la Vega; Kelly R Vandenberg; Jarred V Bratley; Chia-Jen Liu; Lakshmi P Kunju; Jeffery S Montgomery; Todd M Morgan; Shyam Natarajan; Jiaoti Huang; Scott A Tomlins; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Targeted prostate biopsy in select men for active surveillance: do the Epstein criteria still apply?

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Edward Chang; Shyam Natarajan; Daniel J Margolis; Malu Macairan; Patricia Lieu; Jiaoti Huang; Geoffrey Sonn; Frederick J Dorey; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Marital status and prostate cancer incidence: a pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies from the PRACTICAL consortium.

Authors:  Charlotte Salmon; Lixin Song; Kenneth Muir; Nora Pashayan; Alison M Dunning; Jyotsna Batra; Suzanne Chambers; Janet L Stanford; Elaine A Ostrander; Jong Y Park; Hui-Yi Lin; Olivier Cussenot; Géraldine Cancel-Tassin; Florence Menegaux; Emilie Cordina-Duverger; Manolis Kogevinas; Javier Llorca; Radka Kaneva; Chavdar Slavov; Azad Razack; Jasmine Lim; Manuela Gago-Dominguez; Jose Esteban Castelao; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Rosalind A Eeles; Marie-Élise Parent
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 8.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.