BACKGROUND: Hospital readmission rates within 30 days after acute myocardial infarction are a national performance metric. Previous data suggest that early physician follow-up after heart failure hospitalizations can reduce readmissions; whether these results can be extended to acute myocardial infarction is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed data from the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) Registry linked with Medicare claims from 2003 to 2006 for 25 872 non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients ≥65 years of age discharged home from 228 hospitals with >25 patients and full revascularization capabilities. After adjusting for patient, treatment, and hospital characteristics, we examined the relationship between hospital-level physician follow-up within 7 days of discharge and 30-day all-cause readmission using logistic regression. The median hospital-level percentage of patients receiving early physician follow-up was 23.3% (interquartile range, 17.1%-29.1%). Among 24 165 patients with Medicare fee-for-service eligibility 30 days after discharge, 18.5% of patients were readmitted within 30 days of index hospitalization. Unadjusted and adjusted rates of 30-day readmission did not differ among quartiles of hospital-level early physician follow-up. Similarly, each 5% increase in hospital early follow-up was associated with an insignificant change in risk for readmission (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.02; P=0.60). Sensitivity analyses extended these null findings to 30-day cardiovascular readmissions, high-risk subgroups, and early cardiology follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although rates of early physician follow-up after acute myocardial infarction varied among US hospitals, hospitals with higher early follow-up rates did not have lower 30-day readmission rates. Targeting strategies other than early physician follow-up may be necessary to reduce readmissions in this population.
BACKGROUND: Hospital readmission rates within 30 days after acute myocardial infarction are a national performance metric. Previous data suggest that early physician follow-up after heart failure hospitalizations can reduce readmissions; whether these results can be extended to acute myocardial infarction is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed data from the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable AnginaPatients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) Registry linked with Medicare claims from 2003 to 2006 for 25 872 non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarctionpatients ≥65 years of age discharged home from 228 hospitals with >25 patients and full revascularization capabilities. After adjusting for patient, treatment, and hospital characteristics, we examined the relationship between hospital-level physician follow-up within 7 days of discharge and 30-day all-cause readmission using logistic regression. The median hospital-level percentage of patients receiving early physician follow-up was 23.3% (interquartile range, 17.1%-29.1%). Among 24 165 patients with Medicare fee-for-service eligibility 30 days after discharge, 18.5% of patients were readmitted within 30 days of index hospitalization. Unadjusted and adjusted rates of 30-day readmission did not differ among quartiles of hospital-level early physician follow-up. Similarly, each 5% increase in hospital early follow-up was associated with an insignificant change in risk for readmission (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.02; P=0.60). Sensitivity analyses extended these null findings to 30-day cardiovascular readmissions, high-risk subgroups, and early cardiology follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although rates of early physician follow-up after acute myocardial infarction varied among US hospitals, hospitals with higher early follow-up rates did not have lower 30-day readmission rates. Targeting strategies other than early physician follow-up may be necessary to reduce readmissions in this population.
Authors: James W Hoekstra; Charles V Pollack; Matthew T Roe; Eric D Peterson; Ralph Brindis; Robert A Harrington; Robert H Christenson; Sidney C Smith; E Magnus Ohman; W Brian Gibler Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Adrian F Hernandez; Melissa A Greiner; Gregg C Fonarow; Bradley G Hammill; Paul A Heidenreich; Clyde W Yancy; Eric D Peterson; Lesley H Curtis Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-05-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: P Michael Ho; Stacie A Luther; Frederick A Masoudi; Indra Gupta; Elliott Lowy; Charles Maynard; Anne E Sales; Eric D Peterson; Stephan D Fihn; John S Rumsfeld Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Adam M Rogers; Vijay S Ramanath; Mary Grzybowski; Arthur L Riba; Sandeep M Jani; Rajendra Mehta; Anthony C De Franco; Robert Parrish; Stephen Skorcz; Patricia L Baker; Jessica Faul; Benrong Chen; Canopy Roychoudhury; Mary Anne C Elma; Kristi R Mitchell; James B Froehlich; Cecelia Montoye; Kim A Eagle Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Christopher O Phillips; Scott M Wright; David E Kern; Ramesh M Singa; Sasha Shepperd; Haya R Rubin Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-03-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Bradley G Hammill; Adrian F Hernandez; Eric D Peterson; Gregg C Fonarow; Kevin A Schulman; Lesley H Curtis Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Christopher B Granger; Robert J Goldberg; Omar Dabbous; Karen S Pieper; Kim A Eagle; Christopher P Cannon; Frans Van De Werf; Alvaro Avezum; Shaun G Goodman; Marcus D Flather; Keith A A Fox Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2003-10-27
Authors: Mayra Tisminetzky; David D McManus; Nathaniel Erskine; Jane S Saczynski; Jorge Yarzebski; Edgard Granillo; Joel Gore; Robert J Goldberg Journal: Am J Med Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Ernest Spitzer; Martina Frei; Serge Zaugg; Susanne Hadorn; Henning Kelbaek; Miodrag Ostojic; Andreas Baumbach; David Tüller; Marco Roffi; Thomas Engstrom; Giovanni Pedrazzini; Vladan Vukcevic; Michael Magro; Ran Kornowski; Thomas F Lüscher; Clemens von Birgelen; Dik Heg; Stephan Windecker; Lorenz Räber Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-08-05 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Richard Scott Saunders; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Paul J Rathouz; Sandeep Saha; Jason T Wiseman; Jeffrey Havlena; Jon Matsumura; K Craig Kent Journal: Surgery Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Lauren Lapointe-Shaw; Muhammad Mamdani; Jin Luo; Peter C Austin; Noah M Ivers; Donald A Redelmeier; Chaim M Bell Journal: CMAJ Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Alan R Tang; Matthews Lan; Katherine A Kelly; Bradley S Guidry; Aaron M Yengo-Kahn; Patrick D Kelly; Silky Chotai; Peter J Morone Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 2.104