CONTEXT: Comprehensive discharge planning plus postdischarge support may reduce readmission rates for older patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of comprehensive discharge planning plus postdischarge support on the rate of readmission in patients with CHF, all-cause mortality, length of stay (LOS), quality of life (QOL), and medical costs. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE (1966 to October 2003), the Cochrane Clinical Trials Register (all years), Social Science Citation Index (1992 to October 2003), and other databases for studies that described such an intervention and evaluated its effect in patients with CHF. Where possible we also contacted lead investigators and experts in the field. STUDY SELECTION: We selected English-language publications of randomized clinical trials that described interventions to modify hospital discharge for older patients with CHF (mean age > or =55 years), delineated clearly defined inpatient and outpatient components, compared efficacy with usual care, and reported readmission as the primary outcome. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently reviewed each report, assigned quality scores, and extracted data for primary and secondary outcomes in an unblinded standardized manner. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eighteen studies representing data from 8 countries randomized 3304 older inpatients with CHF to comprehensive discharge planning plus postdischarge support or usual care. During a pooled mean observation period of 8 months (range, 3-12 months), fewer intervention patients were readmitted compared with controls (555/1590 vs 741/1714, number needed to treat = 12; relative risk [RR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.88). Analysis of studies reporting secondary outcomes found a trend toward lower all-cause mortality for patients assigned to an intervention compared with usual care (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73-1.03; n = 14 studies), similar initial LOS (mean [SE]: 8.4 [2.5] vs 8.5 [2.2] days, P =.60; n = 10), greater percentage improvement in QOL scores compared with baseline scores (25.7% [95% CI, 11.0%-40.4%] vs 13.5% [95% CI, 5.1%-22.0%]; n = 6, P =.01), and similar or lower charges for medical care per patient per month for the initial hospital stay, administering the intervention, outpatient care, and readmission (-359 dollars [95% CI, -763 dollars to 45 dollars]; n = 4, P =.10 for non-US trials and -536 dollars [95% CI, -956 dollars to -115 dollars]; n = 4, P =.03, for US trials). CONCLUSION: Comprehensive discharge planning plus postdischarge support for older patients with CHF significantly reduced readmission rates and may improve health outcomes such as survival and QOL without increasing costs.
CONTEXT: Comprehensive discharge planning plus postdischarge support may reduce readmission rates for older patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of comprehensive discharge planning plus postdischarge support on the rate of readmission in patients with CHF, all-cause mortality, length of stay (LOS), quality of life (QOL), and medical costs. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE (1966 to October 2003), the Cochrane Clinical Trials Register (all years), Social Science Citation Index (1992 to October 2003), and other databases for studies that described such an intervention and evaluated its effect in patients with CHF. Where possible we also contacted lead investigators and experts in the field. STUDY SELECTION: We selected English-language publications of randomized clinical trials that described interventions to modify hospital discharge for older patients with CHF (mean age > or =55 years), delineated clearly defined inpatient and outpatient components, compared efficacy with usual care, and reported readmission as the primary outcome. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently reviewed each report, assigned quality scores, and extracted data for primary and secondary outcomes in an unblinded standardized manner. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eighteen studies representing data from 8 countries randomized 3304 older inpatients with CHF to comprehensive discharge planning plus postdischarge support or usual care. During a pooled mean observation period of 8 months (range, 3-12 months), fewer intervention patients were readmitted compared with controls (555/1590 vs 741/1714, number needed to treat = 12; relative risk [RR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.88). Analysis of studies reporting secondary outcomes found a trend toward lower all-cause mortality for patients assigned to an intervention compared with usual care (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73-1.03; n = 14 studies), similar initial LOS (mean [SE]: 8.4 [2.5] vs 8.5 [2.2] days, P =.60; n = 10), greater percentage improvement in QOL scores compared with baseline scores (25.7% [95% CI, 11.0%-40.4%] vs 13.5% [95% CI, 5.1%-22.0%]; n = 6, P =.01), and similar or lower charges for medical care per patient per month for the initial hospital stay, administering the intervention, outpatient care, and readmission (-359 dollars [95% CI, -763 dollars to 45 dollars]; n = 4, P =.10 for non-US trials and -536 dollars [95% CI, -956 dollars to -115 dollars]; n = 4, P =.03, for US trials). CONCLUSION: Comprehensive discharge planning plus postdischarge support for older patients with CHF significantly reduced readmission rates and may improve health outcomes such as survival and QOL without increasing costs.
Authors: Andreas Von der Heidt; Elske Ammenwerth; Karl Bauer; Bettina Fetz; Thomas Fluckinger; Andrea Gassner; Willhelm Grander; Walter Gritsch; Immaculata Haffner; Gudrun Henle-Talirz; Stefan Hoschek; Stephan Huter; Peter Kastner; Susanne Krestan; Peter Kufner; Robert Modre-Osprian; Josef Noebl; Momen Radi; Clemens Raffeiner; Stefan Welte; Andreas Wiseman; Gerhard Poelzl Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Hanneke W Drewes; Lotte M G Steuten; Lidwien C Lemmens; Caroline A Baan; Hendriek C Boshuizen; Arianne M J Elissen; Karin M M Lemmens; Jolanda A C Meeuwissen; Hubertus J M Vrijhoef Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Patricia L Harrison; Pamela A Hara; James E Pope; Michelle C Young; Elizabeth Y Rula Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2010-11-19 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Deborah J Wexler; Catherine C Beauharnais; Susan Regan; David M Nathan; Enrico Cagliero; Mary E Larkin Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Michele Heisler; Lakshmi Halasyamani; Mark E Cowen; Matthew D Davis; Ken Resnicow; Robert L Strawderman; Hwajung Choi; Rebecca Mase; John D Piette Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Jerry H Gurwitz; Terry S Field; Jessica Ogarek; Jennifer Tjia; Sarah L Cutrona; Leslie R Harrold; Shawn J Gagne; Peggy Preusse; Jennifer L Donovan; Abir O Kanaan; George Reed; Lawrence Garber Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Alicia I Arbaje; Devan L Kansagara; Amanda H Salanitro; Honora L Englander; Sunil Kripalani; Stephen F Jencks; Lee A Lindquist Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 5.128