| Literature DB >> 23945644 |
Yu Cao1, Weifei Wang, Yang Xu, Bo Yang, Yonghua Wang.
Abstract
This work was objectively targeted to synthesize extremely pure triacylglycerols (TAG) enriched in conjugated linoleic acids (CLAs) for medical and dietetic purposes. Extremely pure CLA-enriched TAG was successfully synthesized by using the multi-step process: TAG was primarily synthesized by lipase-catalyzed esterification of CLA and glycerol and then the lower glycerides [monoacylglycerol (MAG) and diacylglycerol (DAG)] in the esterification mixtures was hydrolyzed to free fatty acids (FFAs) by a mono- and di-acylglycerol lipase (lipase SMG1), finally, the FFAs were further separated from TAG by low temperature (150 °C) molecular distillation. The operation parameters for the lipase SMG1-catalyzed hydrolysis were optimized using response surface methodology based on the central composite rotatable design (CCRD). The operation parameters included water content, pH and reaction temperature and all of these three parameters showed significant effects on the hydrolysis of lower glycerides. The optimal conditions were obtained with a water content of 66.4% (w/w, with respect to oil mass), pH at 5.7 and 1 h of reaction time at 19.6 °C. Under these conditions, the content of lower glycerides in the reaction mixture decreased from 45.2% to 0.3% and the purity of CLA-enriched TAG reached 99.7%. Further purification of TAG was accomplished by molecular distillation and the final CLA-enriched TAG product yielded 99.8% of TAG. These extremely pure CLA-enriched TAG would be used for in vivo studies in animals and humans in order to get specific information concerning CLA metabolism.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23945644 PMCID: PMC6270589 DOI: 10.3390/molecules18089704
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Novo 435 catalyzed esterification of CLA and glycerol. Reaction conditions were as follows: CLA/glycerol molar ratio, 3:1; enzyme loading, 1% (w/w, with respect to total reactants); temperature, 60 °C; pressure, 0.1 kPa; reaction time, 6 h.
Experimental design and results of CCRD optimization experiment a.
| Trials |
|
|
| Purity of TAG (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed | Predicted | ||||
| 1 | −1(30) | −1(5) | −1(20) | 91.5 ± 0.14 | 91.47 |
| 2 | 1(90) | −1(5) | −1(20) | 91.3 ± 0.17 | 91.37 |
| 3 | −1(30) | 1(6) | −1(20) | 92.3 ± 0.11 | 92.31 |
| 4 | 1(90) | 1(6) | −1(20) | 98.3 ± 0.13 | 98.21 |
| 5 | −1(30) | −1(5) | 1(30) | 86.3 ± 0.10 | 86.37 |
| 6 | 1(90) | −1(5) | 1(30) | 91.9 ± 0.16 | 91.87 |
| 7 | −1(30) | 1(6) | 1(30) | 82.5 ± 0.17 | 82.41 |
| 8 | 1(90) | 1(6) | 1(30) | 93.9 ± 0.12 | 93.92 |
| 9 | −1.68(9.5) | 0(5.5) | 0(25) | 89.1 ± 0.09 | 89.12 |
| 10 | 1.68(110.4) | 0(5.5) | 0(25) | 98.7 ± 0.11 | 98.71 |
| 11 | 0(60) | −1.68(4.6) | 0(25) | 84.8 ± 0.14 | 84.75 |
| 12 | 0(60) | 1.68(6.3) | 0(25) | 87.1 ± 0.14 | 87.18 |
| 13 | 0(60) | 0(5.5) | −1.68(16.6) | 98.5 ± 0.11 | 98.51 |
| 14 | 0(60) | 0(5.5) | 1.68(33.4) | 90.6 ± 0.13 | 90.61 |
| 15 | 0(60) | 0(5.5) | 0(25) | 99.5 ± 0.08 | 99.53 |
| 16 | 0(60) | 0(5.5) | 0(25) | 99.5 ± 0.11 | 99.53 |
| 17 | 0(60) | 0(5.5) | 0(25) | 99.7 ± 0.12 | 99.53 |
| 18 | 0(60) | 0(5.5) | 0(25) | 99.4 ± 0.10 | 99.53 |
| 19 | 0(60) | 0(5.5) | 0(25) | 99.5 ± 0.13 | 99.53 |
| 20 | 0(60) | 0(5.5) | 0(25) | 99.6 ± 0.12 | 99.53 |
a X1, water content (w/w, with respect to total oil mass); X2, pH value; X3, reaction temperature (°C).
Model-fitting results and analysis of variance for the TAG purity a.
| Source | Degree of freedom | Mean square | Prob > | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 9 | 69.21 | 7728.11 | <0.0001 |
| X1 | 1 | 111.06 | 12400.74 | <0.0001 |
| X2 | 1 | 7.13 | 796.18 | <0.0001 |
| X3 | 1 | 75.38 | 8417.34 | <0.0001 |
| X1X2 | 1 | 18.00 | 2009.85 | <0.0001 |
| X1X3 | 1 | 15.68 | 1750.80 | <0.0001 |
| X2X3 | 1 | 11.52 | 1286.30 | <0.0001 |
| X12 | 1 | 56.89 | 6352.52 | <0.0001 |
| X22 | 1 | 331.71 | 37038.25 | <0.0001 |
| X32 | 1 | 44.49 | 4968.01 | <0.0001 |
| Residual | 10 | 8.956E-003 | ||
| Lack of Fit | 5 | 7.245E-003 | 0.68 | 0.6592 |
| Pure Error | 5 | 0.011 |
a R2 = 0.9999, Adj R2 = 0.9997, F(9, 10) = 4.94.
Figure 2Main effect plot showing the effect of water content (a), pH (b) and temperature (°C) on TAG purity.
Figure 3Response surface plot (a) and its contour plot (b) of the TAG purity; temperature vs. water content with a constant level of pH (pH = 5).
Figure 4Response surface plot (a) and its contour plot (b) of the TAG purity; pH vs. water content with a constant level of temperature (20 °C).
Figure 5Response surface plot (a) and its contour plot (b) of the TAG purity; temperature vs. pH with a constant level of water content (60%).
Acylglycerol profile, fatty acid composition of extremely pure CLA-enriched TAG.
| CLA | CLA-enriched TAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Acylglycerol Profile (%) | ||
| TAG | 0 | 99.8 |
| DAG | 0 | 0.2 |
| MAG | 0 | 0 |
| FA | 100 | 0 |
| Fatty Acid Compositions (%) | ||
| C16:0 | 4.74 | 4.95 |
| C18:0 | 2.22 | 2.32 |
| C18:1 | 11.47 | 11.56 |
| C18:2 | 0.95 | 0.97 |
| Total CLA | 80.62 | 80.22 |
| c9,t11-CLA | 33.95 | 31.78 |
| t10,c12-CLA | 43.59 | 44.92 |
| Other CLA | 3.08 | 3.52 |