Literature DB >> 23942934

Lymph node evaluation for colon cancer in an era of quality guidelines: who improves?

Helen M Parsons1, James W Begun, Karen M Kuntz, Todd M Tuttle, Patricia M McGovern, Beth A Virnig.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the 1990s, several organizations began recommending evaluation of > 12 lymph nodes during colon resection because of its association with improved survival. We examined practice implications of multispecialty quality guidelines over the past 20 years recommending evaluation of ≥ 12 lymph nodes during colon resection for adequate staging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the 1988 to 2009 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program to conduct a retrospective observational cohort study of 90,203 surgically treated patients with colon cancer. We used Cochran-Armitage tests to examine trends in lymph node examination over time and multivariate logistic regression to identify patient characteristics associated with guideline-recommended lymph node evaluation.
RESULTS: The introduction of practice guidelines was associated with gradual increases in guideline-recommended lymph node evaluation. From 1988 to 1990, 34% of patients had > 12 lymph nodes evaluated, increasing to 38% in 1994 to 1996 and to > 75% from 2006 to 2009. Younger, white patients and those with more-extensive bowel penetration (T3/4 nonmetastatic) and high tumor grade saw more-rapid increases in lymph node evaluation (P < .001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated a significant interaction between year of diagnosis and both T stage and grade, indicating that those with higher T stage and higher grade were more likely to receive guideline-recommended care earlier.
CONCLUSION: The implementation of lymph node evaluation guidelines was accepted gradually into practice but adopted more quickly among higher risk patients. By identifying patients who are least likely to receive guideline-recommended care, these findings present a starting point for promoting targeted improvements in cancer care and further understanding underlying contributors to these disparities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23942934      PMCID: PMC3710184          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  23 in total

1.  Implementing clinical practice guidelines: social influence strategies and practitioner behavior change.

Authors:  B S Mittman; X Tonesk; P D Jacobson
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1992-12

2.  Diffusion of breast conserving surgery in medical communities.

Authors:  Bonnie Jerome-D'Emilia; James W Begun
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Practice parameters for colon cancer.

Authors:  Daniel Otchy; Neil H Hyman; Clifford Simmang; Thomas Anthony; W Donald Buie; Peter Cataldo; James Church; Jeffrey Cohen; Frederick Dentsman; C Neal Ellis; John W Kilkenny; Clifford Ko; Richard Moore; Charles Orsay; Ronald Place; Janice Rafferty; Jan Rakinic; Paul Savoca; Joe Tjandra; Mark Whiteford
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: an International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT).

Authors:  L P Fielding; P A Arsenault; P H Chapuis; O Dent; B Gathright; J D Hardcastle; P Hermanek; J R Jass; R C Newland
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.029

5.  Lymph node harvest reporting in patients with carcinoma of the large bowel: a French population-based study.

Authors:  G Cserni
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Lessons for guidelines from the diffusion of innovations.

Authors:  E M Rogers
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1995-07

7.  Association between lymph node evaluation for colon cancer and node positivity over the past 20 years.

Authors:  Helen M Parsons; Todd M Tuttle; Karen M Kuntz; James W Begun; Patricia M McGovern; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

Authors:  C C Compton; L P Fielding; L J Burgart; B Conley; H S Cooper; S R Hamilton; M E Hammond; D E Henson; R V Hutter; R B Nagle; M L Nielsen; D J Sargent; C R Taylor; M Welton; C Willett
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Metastases in small lymph nodes from colon cancer.

Authors:  L Herrera-Ornelas; J Justiniano; N Castillo; N J Petrelli; J P Stulc; A Mittelman
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1987-11

10.  Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089.

Authors:  T E Le Voyer; E R Sigurdson; A L Hanlon; R J Mayer; J S Macdonald; P J Catalano; D G Haller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  10 in total

1.  Effects of newly developed chemotherapy regimens, comorbidities, chemotherapy-related toxicities on the changing patterns of the leading causes of death in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  L Tong; C Ahn; E Symanski; D Lai; X L Du
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Correlation Between Clinical and Pathologic Staging in Colon Cancer: Implications for Neoadjuvant Treatment.

Authors:  Ahmed N Dehal; Amanda N Graff-Baker; Brooke Vuong; Daniel Nelson; Shu-Ching Chang; David Y Lee; Melanie Goldfarb; Anton J Bilchik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Management of nodal disease from colon cancer in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  Corrado Pedrazzani; Lelde Lauka; Simone Sforza; Andrea Ruzzenente; Filippo Nifosì; GianGaetano Delaini; Alfredo Guglielmi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Small Intestine with 9 or More Regional Lymph Nodes Retrieved Have a Higher Rate of Positive Lymph Nodes and Improved Survival.

Authors:  Alexander Wilhelm; Sascha A Müller; Thomas Steffen; Bruno M Schmied; Ulrich Beutner; Rene Warschkow
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Lymph node evaluation for colon cancer in routine clinical practice: a population-based study.

Authors:  J C Del Paggio; S Nanji; X Wei; P H MacDonald; C M Booth
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  A Simplified Two-Step Technique for Extended Lymphadenectomy During Resection of Gastroesophageal Malignancy: Early Results Compared to En Bloc Dissection.

Authors:  Michael J Minarich; Roderich E Schwarz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Number of Nodes Examined and Optimal Lymph Node Prognostic Scheme.

Authors:  Fabio Bagante; Thuy Tran; Gaya Spolverato; Andrea Ruzzenente; Stefan Buttner; Cecilia G Ethun; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Simone Conci; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Gerardo Vitiello; Jan N M IJzermans; Shishir K Maithel; George Poultsides; Alfredo Guglielmi; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Age and Lymph Node Positivity in Patients With Colon and Rectal Cancer in the US Military Health System.

Authors:  Melannie S Alexander; Jie Lin; Craig D Shriver; Katherine A McGlynn; Kangmin Zhu
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.412

9.  The prognostic value of lymph node yield in the earliest stage of colorectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Yara Backes; Sjoerd G Elias; Bibie S Bhoelan; John N Groen; Jeroen van Bergeijk; Tom C J Seerden; Hendrikus J M Pullens; Bernhard W M Spanier; Joost M J Geesing; Koen Kessels; Marjon Kerkhof; Peter D Siersema; Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel; Niels van Lelyveld; Frank H J Wolfhagen; Frank Ter Borg; G Johan A Offerhaus; Miangela M Lacle; Leon M G Moons
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 10.  Tumor Location as a Prognostic Factor in T1 Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Katsuro Ichimasa; Shin-Ei Kudo; Yuta Kouyama; Kenichi Mochizuki; Yuki Takashina; Masashi Misawa; Yuichi Mori; Takemasa Hayashi; Kunihiko Wakamura; Hideyuki Miyachi
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2022-01-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.