Literature DB >> 23942527

Prospective randomized trial of hybrid NOTES colectomy versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for left-sided colonic tumors.

Alex Lik Hang Leung1, Hester Yui Shan Cheung, Benny Ka Lung Fok, Cliff Chi Chiu Chung, Michael Ka Wah Li, Chung Ngai Tang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized study of a laparoscopic technique for removing left-sided colon tumors that can reduce postoperative pain and other wound-related complications compared to the conventional technique. It is a novel technique of hybrid natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) colectomy (HNC) whereby laparoscopic colonic mobilization, transection, and anastomosis are performed intracorporeally. The specimen is then delivered through the anus using the transanal endoscopic operation (TEO) device, precluding the need for mini-laparotomy. We compared the short-term outcomes of patients who underwent HNC with those who underwent conventional laparoscopic colectomy (CL).
METHODS: Patients suffering left-sided colonic tumor were recruited and were randomized into two groups: HNC and CL. Operative data and complications were prospectively recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS: During a 3-year period, we recruited 70 patients (35 per group). No significant difference was observed between the two groups with respect to operating time (105 vs. 100 min, p = 0.851), blood loss (30 vs. 30 ml, p = 0.954), or length of hospital stay (5 vs. 5 days, p = 0.990). The maximum pain score during the first week was significantly lower in the HNC group (1 vs. 2, p = 0.017). No patients in the HNC group developed wound infection, whereas four patients in the CL group did so (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: With this hybrid NOTES technique, selected patients with left-sided colonic tumors can enjoy the full benefits of minimally invasive surgery with significantly less wound pain and a lower wound infection rate than are observed with CL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23942527     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2163-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  24 in total

1.  Laparoscopic anterior resection for colorectal cancer without minilaparotomy using transanal bowel reversing retrieval.

Authors:  Masayasu Hara; Satoru Takayama; Mikinori Sato; Hiroyuki Imafuji; Hiroki Takahashi; Hiromitsu Takeyama
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.719

2.  Laparoscopic-assisted sigmoidectomy with transanal specimen extraction: a bridge to NOTES?

Authors:  J Knol; M D'Hondt; E J Dozois; J Vanden Boer; P Malisse
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  A review of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery: experimental models, techniques, and applicability to the clinical setting.

Authors:  Eliana Della Flora; Thomas G Wilson; Ian J Martin; Nicholas A O'Rourke; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) with transanal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) sigmoidectomy: a new step before pure colorectal natural orifices transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES®).

Authors:  Joel Leroy; Michele Diana; James Wall; Federico Costantino; Jacopo D'Agostino; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Natural orifice specimen extraction in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: transanal and transvaginal approaches.

Authors:  M E Franklin; S Liang; K Russek
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Laparoscopic left colectomy combined with natural orifice access: operative technique and initial results.

Authors:  Stefano Saad; Hisahiro Hosogi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Endo-laparoscopic colectomy without mini-laparotomy for left-sided colonic tumors.

Authors:  Hester Y S Cheung; Alex L H Leung; C C Chung; Dennis C K Ng; Michael K W Li
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  28 in total

1.  Laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bin Ma; Xuan-Zhang Huang; Peng Gao; Jun-Hua Zhao; Yong-Xi Song; Jing-Xu Sun; Xiao-Wan Chen; Zhen-Ning Wang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Shifting Paradigms in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Applications of Transanal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Grace Clara Lee; Patricia Sylla
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

Review 3.  Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in China: an overview.

Authors:  Ketao Jin; Jun Wang; Huanrong Lan; Ruili Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

4.  Transrectal rigid-hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy can be performed without peritoneal contamination: a controlled porcine survival study.

Authors:  Philip C Müller; Jonas D Senft; Philip Gath; Daniel C Steinemann; Felix Nickel; Adrian T Billeter; Beat P Müller-Stich; Georg R Linke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  [Implementation of hybrid-NOTES sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease : In a center for minimally invasive surgery].

Authors:  D C Steinemann; A Zerz; S H Lamm
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Standardized laparoscopic NOSE-colectomy is feasible with low morbidity.

Authors:  Albert M Wolthuis; Anthony de Buck van Overstraeten; Steffen Fieuws; Katrien Boon; André D'Hoore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Left colon resection with transrectal specimen extraction: current status.

Authors:  D Zattoni; G S Popeskou; D Christoforidis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 8.  Comprehensive literature review of randomized clinical trials examining novel treatment advances in patients with colon cancer.

Authors:  William Paul Skelton; Aaron J Franke; Atif Iqbal; Thomas J George
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-08

9.  Clinical impact of single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal resection for advanced colon cancer: propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Masashi Yamamoto; Mitsuhiro Asakuma; Keitaro Tanaka; Shinsuke Masubuchi; Masatsugu Ishii; Wataru Osumi; Hiroki Hamamoto; Junji Okuda; Kazuhisa Uchiyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  [Transanal extraction vs. minilaparotomy : For laparoendoscopic left-sided colon resection].

Authors:  A C Brockhaus; D Politt; C Lindlohr; S Saad
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.