Bin Ma1, Xuan-Zhang Huang2, Peng Gao3, Jun-Hua Zhao4, Yong-Xi Song5, Jing-Xu Sun6, Xiao-Wan Chen7, Zhen-Ning Wang8. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China. mabin0326cmu@163.com. 2. Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China. qq_347310502@126.com. 3. Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China. gaokaji16@163.com. 4. Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China. zjh900521@163.com. 5. Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China. songyongxi840309@126.com. 6. Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China. sun2003999@163.com. 7. Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China. chenxiaowan1826@163.com. 8. Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China. josieon826@sina.cn.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We wished to determine the effects of laparoscopic resection using natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) for patients with colorectal disease through a meta-analysis. METHODS: A study search was undertaken in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for eligible studies until December 2014. Duration of hospital stay, operation time, time to first flatus, pain score, cosmetic result, postoperative complications, and disease-free survival (DFS) were the main endpoints. The results were analyzed using RevMan v5.3. RESULTS: Nine clinical studies involving 837 patients were included for final analyses. Laparoscopic resection with NOSE had a shorter duration of hospital stay (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -0.62 days, 95 % confidence interval (CI) [-0.95, -0.28], p < 0.01) and time to first flatus (WMD = -0.59 days, 95 % CI [-0.78, -0.41], p < 0.01), less postoperative pain (WMD = -1.43, 95 % CI [-1.95, -0.90], p < 0.01), and postoperative complications (odds ratio (OR) = 0.51, 95 % CI [0.36, 0.74], p < 0.01) with better cosmetic result (WMD = 1.37, 95 % CI [0.59, 2.14], p < 0.01). However, the operation time was significantly longer in the NOSE group (WMD = 20.97 min, 95 % CI [4.33, 37.62], p = 0.01). No significant difference was observed in DFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.88, 95 % CI [0.49, 1.57], p = 0.67). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis supported the notion that laparoscopic resection with NOSE for colorectal disease can significantly reduce the duration of hospital stay, accelerate postoperative recovery with better cosmetic results, and in particular, result in less postoperative pain and fewer complications.
PURPOSE: We wished to determine the effects of laparoscopic resection using natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) for patients with colorectal disease through a meta-analysis. METHODS: A study search was undertaken in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for eligible studies until December 2014. Duration of hospital stay, operation time, time to first flatus, pain score, cosmetic result, postoperative complications, and disease-free survival (DFS) were the main endpoints. The results were analyzed using RevMan v5.3. RESULTS: Nine clinical studies involving 837 patients were included for final analyses. Laparoscopic resection with NOSE had a shorter duration of hospital stay (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -0.62 days, 95 % confidence interval (CI) [-0.95, -0.28], p < 0.01) and time to first flatus (WMD = -0.59 days, 95 % CI [-0.78, -0.41], p < 0.01), less postoperative pain (WMD = -1.43, 95 % CI [-1.95, -0.90], p < 0.01), and postoperative complications (odds ratio (OR) = 0.51, 95 % CI [0.36, 0.74], p < 0.01) with better cosmetic result (WMD = 1.37, 95 % CI [0.59, 2.14], p < 0.01). However, the operation time was significantly longer in the NOSE group (WMD = 20.97 min, 95 % CI [4.33, 37.62], p = 0.01). No significant difference was observed in DFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.88, 95 % CI [0.49, 1.57], p = 0.67). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis supported the notion that laparoscopic resection with NOSE for colorectal disease can significantly reduce the duration of hospital stay, accelerate postoperative recovery with better cosmetic results, and in particular, result in less postoperative pain and fewer complications.
Authors: Dirk R Bulian; Norbert Runkel; Jens Burghardt; Wolfram Lamade; Michael Butters; Markus Utech; Klaus-Peter Thon; Rolf Lefering; Markus M Heiss; Heinz J Buhr; Kai S Lehmann Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: A M Wolthuis; C Meuleman; C Tomassetti; T D'Hooghe; S Fieuws; A de Buck van Overstraeten; A D'Hoore Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 3.788
Authors: Emmanuel E Sadava; Javier Kerman Cabo; Federico H E Carballo; Maximiliano E Bun; Nicolás A Rotholtz Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-06-18 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-05-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daniel C Steinemann; Andreas Zerz; Michel Adamina; Walter Brunner; Andreas Keerl; Antonio Nocito; Andreas Scheiwiller; Rene Spalinger; Stephan A Vorburger; Sebastian H Lamm Journal: World J Surg Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Jun Seok Park; Hyun Kang; Soo Yeun Park; Hye Jin Kim; In Taek Lee; Gyu-Seog Choi Journal: Ann Surg Treat Res Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 1.859