OBJECTIVE: The use of technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate single-photon emission tomography/computed tomography (99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT) of the spine and sacrum has increased over the past years; however, there is little information about the optimal clinical role and true clinical impact of this modality. METHODS: All 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT examinations of the spine and sacrum performed at our large multispecialty institution between 1 January 2008 and 12 April 2012 were identified. The indications, findings, clinical context, and impact on patient management were identified through a retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Of the 212 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT examinations of the spine and sacrum identified, 191 (90%) were for pain evaluation, 14 (7%) were to assess infection, and seven (3%) were to evaluate a potential malignancy. The most common specific indication was evaluation of facet joint pain in 70/191 (37%) patients, and the most common finding was facet joint activity in 106/212 (50%) patients. Several findings were reported, although facet joint activity was the most frequent. The other findings included costovertebral joint activity, pars interarticularis defects, an osteoid osteoma, a lumbosacral pseudoarticulation, and a postoperative pseudoarthrosis. A resultant change in clinical management was documented in 168/212 (79%) patients. Ninety-two of the 212 (44%) patients had undergone an MRI of the same region for any indication within ±6 months. CONCLUSION: 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT of the spine and sacrum is most frequently used for the diagnosis and management of pain. It helps identify several potential pain generators, is often used in patients who have a near-contemporaneous MRI, and has an impact on the procedural and/or conservative management in most patients. In addition, several areas in need of future research to establish the optimal clinical role of this modality were identified.
OBJECTIVE: The use of technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate single-photon emission tomography/computed tomography (99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT) of the spine and sacrum has increased over the past years; however, there is little information about the optimal clinical role and true clinical impact of this modality. METHODS: All 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT examinations of the spine and sacrum performed at our large multispecialty institution between 1 January 2008 and 12 April 2012 were identified. The indications, findings, clinical context, and impact on patient management were identified through a retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Of the 212 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT examinations of the spine and sacrum identified, 191 (90%) were for pain evaluation, 14 (7%) were to assess infection, and seven (3%) were to evaluate a potential malignancy. The most common specific indication was evaluation of facet joint pain in 70/191 (37%) patients, and the most common finding was facet joint activity in 106/212 (50%) patients. Several findings were reported, although facet joint activity was the most frequent. The other findings included costovertebral joint activity, pars interarticularis defects, an osteoid osteoma, a lumbosacral pseudoarticulation, and a postoperative pseudoarthrosis. A resultant change in clinical management was documented in 168/212 (79%) patients. Ninety-two of the 212 (44%) patients had undergone an MRI of the same region for any indication within ±6 months. CONCLUSION: 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT of the spine and sacrum is most frequently used for the diagnosis and management of pain. It helps identify several potential pain generators, is often used in patients who have a near-contemporaneous MRI, and has an impact on the procedural and/or conservative management in most patients. In addition, several areas in need of future research to establish the optimal clinical role of this modality were identified.
Authors: Khulood Al-Riyami; Stefan Vöö; Gopinath Gnanasegaran; Ian Pressney; Adam Meir; Adrian Casey; Sean Molloy; James Allibone; Jamshed Bomanji Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Vance T Lehman; Robert C Murphy; Louis A Schenck; Rickey E Carter; Geoffrey B Johnson; Amy L Kotsenas; Jonathan M Morris; Mark A Nathan; John T Wald; Timothy P Maus Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2016 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.630
Authors: Maciej Radek; Andrzej Radek; Jacek Rysz; Zbigniew Maziarz; Mariusz Gadzicki; Wiesław Tryniszewski Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 3.318