Literature DB >> 23937598

A human alcohol self-administration paradigm to model individual differences in impaired control over alcohol use.

Robert F Leeman1, William R Corbin, Christine Nogueira, Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin, Marc N Potenza, Stephanie S O'Malley.   

Abstract

We developed an alcohol self-administration paradigm to model individual differences in impaired control. The paradigm includes moderate drinking guidelines meant to model limits on alcohol consumption, which are typically exceeded by people with impaired control. Possible payment reductions provided a disincentive for excessive drinking. Alcohol use above the guideline, despite possible pay reductions, was considered to be indicative of impaired control. Heavy-drinking 21- to 25-year-olds (n = 39) were randomized to an experimental condition including the elements of the impaired control paradigm or to a free-drinking condition without these elements. Alcohol self-administration was compared between these two conditions to establish the internal validity of the experimental paradigm. In both conditions, participants self-administered beer and nonalcoholic beverages for 3 hours in a bar setting with 1-3 other participants. Experimental condition participants self-administered significantly fewer beers and drank to lower blood-alcohol concentrations (BACs) on average than those in the free-drinking condition. Experimental condition participants were more likely than free-drinking condition participants to intersperse nonalcoholic beverages with beer and to drink at a slower pace. Although experimental condition participants drank more moderately than those in the free-drinking condition overall, their range of drinking was considerable (BAC range = .024-.097), with several participants drinking excessively. A lower initial subjective response to alcohol and earlier age of alcohol use onset were associated with greater alcohol self-administration in the experimental condition. Given the variability in response, the impaired control laboratory paradigm may have utility for preliminary tests of novel interventions in future studies and for identifying individual differences in problem-drinking risk. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23937598      PMCID: PMC4131292          DOI: 10.1037/a0033438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  54 in total

1.  The Self-Rating of the Effects of alcohol (SRE) form as a retrospective measure of the risk for alcoholism.

Authors:  M A Schuckit; T L Smith; J E Tipp
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Estimating blood alcohol concentration: two computer programs and their applications in therapy and research.

Authors:  D B Matthews; W R Miller
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Nicotine and food deprivation decrease the ability to resist smoking.

Authors:  Robert F Leeman; Stephanie S O'Malley; Marney A White; Sherry A McKee
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Acute tolerance to alcohol impairment of behavioral and cognitive mechanisms related to driving: drinking and driving on the descending limb.

Authors:  Jessica Weafer; Mark T Fillmore
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Alcohol increases impulsivity and abuse liability in heavy drinking women.

Authors:  Stephanie Collins Reed; Frances R Levin; Suzette M Evans
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  The discovery of addiction. Changing conceptions of habitual drunkenness in America.

Authors:  H G Levine
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1978-01

Review 7.  Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; Lori A J Scott-Sheldon; Michael P Carey; Kelly S DeMartini
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  The Impaired Control Scale: confirmation of factor structure and psychometric properties for social drinkers and drinkers in alcohol treatment.

Authors:  A Marsh; L Smith; B Saunders; J Piek
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  The relationships of the level of response to alcohol and additional characteristics to alcohol use disorders across adulthood: a discrete-time survival analysis.

Authors:  Ryan S Trim; Marc A Schuckit; Tom L Smith
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  A safety and tolerability laboratory study of the combination of aripiprazole and topiramate in volunteers who drink alcohol.

Authors:  George A Kenna; Lorenzo Leggio; Robert M Swift
Journal:  Hum Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.672

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  A brief, critical review of research on impaired control over alcohol use and suggestions for future studies.

Authors:  Robert F Leeman; Cheryl L Beseler; Christa M Helms; Julie A Patock-Peckham; Vanessa A Wakeling; Christopher W Kahler
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Craving, cortisol and behavioral alcohol motivation responses to stress and alcohol cue contexts and discrete cues in binge and non-binge drinkers.

Authors:  Sara K Blaine; Nisheet Nautiyal; Rachel Hart; J B Guarnaccia; Rajita Sinha
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.280

3.  More behavioral recommendations produce more change: A meta-analysis of efficacy of multibehavior recommendations to reduce nonmedical substance use.

Authors:  Wenhao Dai; Ryan Palmer; Aashna Sunderrajan; Marta Durantini; Flor Sánchez; Laura R Glasman; Fan Xuan Chen; Dolores Albarracín
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2020-04-20

4.  Do variable rates of alcohol drinking alter the ability to use transdermal alcohol monitors to estimate peak breath alcohol and total number of drinks?

Authors:  Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak; Sarah L Lake; John D Roache; Sharon E Cates; Yuanyuan Liang; Donald M Dougherty
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Faster self-paced rate of drinking for alcohol mixed with energy drinks versus alcohol alone.

Authors:  Cecile A Marczinski; Mark T Fillmore; Sarah F Maloney; Amy L Stamates
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2016-11-07

6.  Distinct ethanol drinking microstructures in two replicate lines of mice selected for drinking to intoxication.

Authors:  A M Barkley-Levenson; J C Crabbe
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.449

7.  A multilevel structural equation model of within- and between-person associations among subjective responses to alcohol, craving, and laboratory alcohol self-administration.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wardell; Vijay A Ramchandani; Christian S Hendershot
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2015-11

8.  A Test of Multisession Automatic Action Tendency Retraining to Reduce Alcohol Consumption Among Young Adults in the Context of a Human Laboratory Paradigm.

Authors:  Robert F Leeman; Christine Nogueira; Reinout W Wiers; Janna Cousijn; Kelly Serafini; Kelly S DeMartini; John A Bargh; Stephanie S O'Malley
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  The Interplay Between Subjective Response to Alcohol, Craving, and Alcohol Self-Administration in the Human Laboratory.

Authors:  ReJoyce Green; Erica Grodin; Aaron C Lim; Alexandra Venegas; Spencer Bujarski; Jennifer Krull; Lara A Ray
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.928

Review 10.  To Infuse or Ingest in Human Laboratory Alcohol Research.

Authors:  Melissa A Cyders; Martin H Plawecki; William Corbin; Andrea King; Denis M McCarthy; Vijay A Ramchandani; Jessica Weafer; Sean J O'Connor
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 3.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.