Literature DB >> 29450895

A Test of Multisession Automatic Action Tendency Retraining to Reduce Alcohol Consumption Among Young Adults in the Context of a Human Laboratory Paradigm.

Robert F Leeman1,2, Christine Nogueira2, Reinout W Wiers3, Janna Cousijn3, Kelly Serafini4, Kelly S DeMartini2, John A Bargh5, Stephanie S O'Malley2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Young adult heavy drinking is an important public health concern. Current interventions have efficacy but with only modest effects, and thus, novel interventions are needed. In prior studies, heavy drinkers, including young adults, have demonstrated stronger automatically triggered approach tendencies to alcohol-related stimuli than lighter drinkers. Automatic action tendency retraining has been developed to correct this tendency and consequently reduce alcohol consumption. This study is the first to test multiple iterations of automatic action tendency retraining, followed by laboratory alcohol self-administration.
METHODS: A total of 72 nontreatment-seeking, heavy drinking young adults ages 21 to 25 were randomized to automatic action tendency retraining or a control condition (i.e., "sham training"). Of these, 69 (54% male) completed 4 iterations of retraining or the control condition over 5 days with an alcohol drinking session on Day 5. Self-administration was conducted according to a human laboratory paradigm designed to model individual differences in impaired control (i.e., difficulty adhering to limits on alcohol consumption).
RESULTS: Automatic action tendency retraining was not associated with greater reduction in alcohol approach tendency or less alcohol self-administration than the control condition. The laboratory paradigm was probably sufficiently sensitive to detect an effect of an experimental manipulation given the range of self-administration behavior observed, both in terms of number of alcoholic and nonalcoholic drinks and measures of drinking topography.
CONCLUSIONS: Automatic action tendency retraining was ineffective among heavy drinking young adults without motivation to change their drinking. Details of the retraining procedure may have contributed to the lack of a significant effect. Despite null primary findings, the impaired control laboratory paradigm is a valid laboratory-based measure of young adult alcohol consumption that provides the opportunity to observe drinking topography and self-administration of nonalcoholic beverages (i.e., protective behavioral strategies directly related to alcohol use).
Copyright © 2018 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol Self-Administration; Automatic Action Tendency Retraining; Cognitive Bias Retraining; Impaired Control Over Alcohol Use; Young Adult

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29450895      PMCID: PMC5995797          DOI: 10.1111/acer.13613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  45 in total

1.  Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.

Authors:  J J Arnett
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2000-05

2.  Impaired control and undergraduate problem drinking.

Authors:  Robert F Leeman; Miriam Fenton; Joseph R Volpicelli
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 2.826

3.  Assessment of alcohol withdrawal: the revised clinical institute withdrawal assessment for alcohol scale (CIWA-Ar).

Authors:  J T Sullivan; K Sykora; J Schneiderman; C A Naranjo; E M Sellers
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1989-11

4.  I drink therefore I am: validating alcohol-related implicit association tests.

Authors:  Kristen P Lindgren; Clayton Neighbors; Bethany A Teachman; Reinout W Wiers; Erin Westgate; Anthony G Greenwald
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2012-03-19

5.  Estimating blood alcohol concentration: two computer programs and their applications in therapy and research.

Authors:  D B Matthews; W R Miller
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Effects of alcohol cue exposure on response inhibition in detoxified alcohol-dependent patients.

Authors:  Siegfried Gauggel; Anne Heusinger; Thomas Forkmann; Maren Boecker; Johannes Lindenmeyer; W Miles Cox; Mario Staedtgen
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  College student receptiveness to various alcohol treatment options.

Authors:  Amee J Epler; Kenneth J Sher; Tiffany B Loomis; Stephanie S O'Malley
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

8.  Acute and residual effects of alcohol and marijuana, alone and in combination, on mood and performance.

Authors:  L D Chait; J L Perry
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best?

Authors:  Carolin Eberl; Reinout W Wiers; Steffen Pawelczack; Mike Rinck; Eni S Becker; Johannes Lindenmeyer
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.464

10.  The ad-libitum alcohol 'taste test': secondary analyses of potential confounds and construct validity.

Authors:  Andrew Jones; Emily Button; Abigail K Rose; Eric Robinson; Paul Christiansen; Lisa Di Lemma; Matt Field
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  5 in total

1.  Explicit Attitudes, Working Memory Capacity, and Driving After Drinking.

Authors:  Laura E Hatz; Kayleigh N McCarty; Bruce D Bartholow; Denis M McCarthy
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 2.  Evidence for incentive salience sensitization as a pathway to alcohol use disorder.

Authors:  Roberto U Cofresí; Bruce D Bartholow; Thomas M Piasecki
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Effects of a Smartphone-Based Approach-Avoidance Intervention on Chocolate Craving and Consumption: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Adrian Meule; Anna Richard; Radomir Dinic; Jens Blechert
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.773

4.  Event-related and readiness potentials when preparing to approach and avoid alcohol cues following cue avoidance training in heavy drinkers.

Authors:  Lisa C G Di Lemma; Andrej Stancak; Vicente Soto; Nick Fallon; Matt Field
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Measuring approach-avoidance tendencies towards food with touchscreen-based arm movements.

Authors:  Adrian Meule; Anna Richard; Anja Lender; Radomir Dinic; Timo Brockmeyer; Mike Rinck; Jens Blechert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-05-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.