| Literature DB >> 23936607 |
Juana Rosado-Pérez1, Rocío Ortiz, Edelmiro Santiago-Osorio, Víctor Manuel Mendoza-Núñez.
Abstract
It has recently been reported that the practice of Tai Chi reduces oxidative stress (OxS), but it is not clear whether walking or Tai Chi produces a greater antioxidant effect. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the practice of Tai Chi and walking on markers for OxS. We carried out a quasi-experimental study with 106 older adults between 60 and 74 years of age who were clinically healthy and divided into the following groups: (i) control group (n = 23), (ii) walking group (n = 43), and (iii) Tai Chi group (n = 31). We measured the levels of lipoperoxides (LPO), antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and total antioxidant status (TAS) pre- and post-intervention in all subjects. The data were subjected to a covariant analysis. We found lower levels of LPO in the Tai Chi group compared with the walking group (Tai Chi, 0.261 ± 0.02; walking, 0.331 ± 0.02; control, 0.304 ± 0.023 µmol/L; P = 0.05). Likewise, we observed significantly higher SOD activity and lower OxS-score in the Tai Chi group (P < 0.05). Our findings suggest that the practice of Tai Chi produces a more effective antioxidant effect than walking.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23936607 PMCID: PMC3725784 DOI: 10.1155/2013/298590
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1General scheme for study tracking.
Age and blood pressure and body mass index by group.
| Control | Tai Chi | Walking | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 66.4 ± 4 | 66.7 ± 3.8 | 66.8 ± 3.9 |
| SBP (mm/Hg) | |||
| Baseline | 121 ± 23 | 117 ± 12 | 127 ± 15 |
| Postintervention | 124 ± 10 | 111 ± 13* | 123 ± 13 |
| DBP (mm/Hg) | |||
| Baseline | 77 ± 12 | 74 ± 8 | 76 ± 9 |
| Postintervention | 75 ± 5 | 74 ± 10 | 75 ± 8 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | |||
| Baseline | 27 ± 3 | 28 ± 5 | 28 ± 5 |
| Postintervention | 27 ± 4 | 27 ± 5 | 27 ± 6 |
SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; BMI: body mass index. ANOVA test, one time, *P = 0.001.
Biochemical parameters of the study population by group.
| Control | Tai Chi | Walking | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose (mg/dL) | |||
| Baseline | 119 ± 50 | 107 ± 20 | 112 ± 21 |
| Postintervention | 104 ± 29 | 92 ± 12 | 90 ± 19 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | |||
| Baseline | 207 ± 44 | 201 ± 48 | 220 ± 44 |
| Postintervention | 219 ± 48 | 180 ± 41* | 218 ± 40 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | |||
| Baseline | 144 ± 60 | 170 ± 115 | 171 ± 72 |
| Postintervention | 146 ± 51 | 155 ± 93 | 168 ± 63 |
| HDL (mg/dL) | |||
| Baseline | 55 ± 19 | 50 ± 12 | 49 ± 8 |
| Postintervention | 53 ± 11 | 49 ± 12 | 50 ± 11 |
| LDL (mg/dL) | |||
| Baseline | 122 ± 38 | 116 ± 45 | 137 ± 40 |
| Postintervention | 137 ± 43 | 99 ± 37** | 135 ± 65 |
ANOVA test, one time. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001 HDL: High-Density Lipoproteins, LDL: Low-Density Lipoproteins.
Oxidative stress markers baseline and postintervention by group.
| Control | Tai Chi | Walking | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lipoperoxides ( | |||
| Baseline | 0.280 ± 0.07 | 0.287 ± 0.01 | 0.244 ± 0.01 |
| Postintervention | 0.297 ± 0.10 | 0.257 ± 0.09* | 0.330 ± 0.01** |
| SOD (U/mL) | |||
| Baseline | 171 ± 15 | 169 ± 8 | 176 ± 7 |
| Postintervention | 171 ± 8 | 178 ± 9* | 177 ± 9 |
| GPx (U/L) | |||
| Baseline | 7381 ± 2694 | 6225 ± 2869 | 7756 ± 2697 |
| Postintervention | 8154 ± 4208 | 8410 ± 4084 | 11600 ± 6779** |
| TAS (mmol/L) | |||
| Baseline | 1.07 ± 0.23 | 0.82 ± 0.28 | 0.95 ± 0.3 |
| Postintervention | 1.03 ± 0.19 | 1.04 ± 0.16 | 1.01 ± 0.13 |
| SOD/GPx | |||
| Baseline | 25 ± 12 | 34 ± 20 | 26 ± 13 |
| Postintervention | 37 ± 28 | 37 ± 27 | 16 ± 15 |
| OxS-score | |||
| Baseline | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 1.1 | 1.8 ± 1.4 |
| Postintervention | 2.0 ± 0.9 | 0.9 ± 0.8** | 1.1 ± 0.8** |
ANOVA test, one time. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, SOD: superoxide dismutase, GPx: glutathione peroxidase, TAS: Total antioxidant status, GAP: Antioxidant Gap, OxS-score: Oxidative Stress score.
Figure 2Bars show mean adjusted for initial conditions (ANCOVA Test). (a) LPO: control 0.304 ± 0.023, Tai Chi 0.261 ± 0.02, and walking 0.331 ± 0.02 μmol/L, P = 0.08; (b) SOD: control 171 ± 2, Tai Chi 178 ± 2, and walking 177 ± 1 U/mL,*P < 0.05; (c) GPx: control 8087 ± 1113, Tai Chi 8712 ± 923, and walking 11430 ± 711 U/L, P = 0.07; (d) TAS: control 1.0 ± 0.035, Tai Chi 1.08 ± 0.029, and walking 0.99 ± 0.22 mmol/L, P > 0.05; (e) GAP: control 250 ± 46, Tai Chi 381 ± 37, and walking 258 ± 31 μmol/L, P < 0.05; (f) OxS-score: control 2.2 ± 0.18, Tai Chi 0.88 ± 0.15, and walking 1.2 ± 0.12, P < 0.001.