PURPOSE: There is a clear link between dietary behavior and a range of chronic diseases, and overweight and obesity constitute an indirect risk in relation to these diseases. The worksite is a central venue for influencing dietary behavior. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of workplace influences on worker dietary patterns. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The paper reviews the evidence of the effectiveness of dietary health promotion, and provides a brief overview of appropriate theoretical frameworks to guide intervention design and evaluation. The findings are illustrated through research examples. FINDINGS: Through case studies and published research, it is found that workplace dietary interventions are generally effective, especially fruit and vegetable interventions. There is less consistent evidence on the long term effectiveness of workplace weight management interventions, underscoring the need for further research in this area. This paper also reports evidence that changes in the work environment, including through health and safety programs, may contribute to enhancing the effectiveness of workplace health promotion, including dietary interventions. Organizational factors such as work schedule may also influence dietary patterns. The social ecological model, the social contextual model and political process approach are presented as exemplar conceptual models that may be useful when designing or assessing the effects of workplace health promotion. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Using the worksite as setting for influencing health by influencing dietary patterns holds considerable promise and may be instrumental in reducing workers' risk of chronic diseases.
PURPOSE: There is a clear link between dietary behavior and a range of chronic diseases, and overweight and obesity constitute an indirect risk in relation to these diseases. The worksite is a central venue for influencing dietary behavior. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of workplace influences on worker dietary patterns. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The paper reviews the evidence of the effectiveness of dietary health promotion, and provides a brief overview of appropriate theoretical frameworks to guide intervention design and evaluation. The findings are illustrated through research examples. FINDINGS: Through case studies and published research, it is found that workplace dietary interventions are generally effective, especially fruit and vegetable interventions. There is less consistent evidence on the long term effectiveness of workplace weight management interventions, underscoring the need for further research in this area. This paper also reports evidence that changes in the work environment, including through health and safety programs, may contribute to enhancing the effectiveness of workplace health promotion, including dietary interventions. Organizational factors such as work schedule may also influence dietary patterns. The social ecological model, the social contextual model and political process approach are presented as exemplar conceptual models that may be useful when designing or assessing the effects of workplace health promotion. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Using the worksite as setting for influencing health by influencing dietary patterns holds considerable promise and may be instrumental in reducing workers' risk of chronic diseases.
Entities:
Keywords:
Workplace; health promotion; nutrition; obesity; occupational safety and health
Authors: Glorian Sorensen; Anne M Stoddard; Anthony D LaMontagne; Karen Emmons; Mary Kay Hunt; Richard Youngstrom; Deborah McLellan; David C Christiani Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Paul A Schulte; Gregory R Wagner; Aleck Ostry; Laura A Blanciforti; Robert G Cutlip; Kristine M Krajnak; Michael Luster; Albert E Munson; James P O'Callaghan; Christine G Parks; Petia P Simeonova; Diane B Miller Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-01-31 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Glorian Sorensen; Anne M Stoddard; Tamara Dubowitz; Elizabeth M Barbeau; JudyAnn Bigby; Karen M Emmons; Lisa F Berkman; Karen E Peterson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-05-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Mercedes Carnethon; Laurie P Whitsel; Barry A Franklin; Penny Kris-Etherton; Richard Milani; Charlotte A Pratt; Gregory R Wagner Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-09-30 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Orfeu M Buxton; Lisa M Quintiliani; May H Yang; Cara B Ebbeling; Anne M Stoddard; Lesley K Pereira; Glorian Sorensen Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Frances E Thompson; Timothy S McNeel; Emily C Dowling; Douglas Midthune; Meredith Morrissette; Christopher A Zeruto Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2009-08
Authors: Tea Lallukka; Eero Lahelma; Ossi Rahkonen; Eva Roos; Elina Laaksonen; Pekka Martikainen; Jenny Head; Eric Brunner; Annhild Mosdol; Michael Marmot; Michikazu Sekine; Ali Nasermoaddeli; Sadanobu Kagamimori Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2008-02-08 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Emminarie Luisiana Lucas Garcia; David Debensason; Loïc Capron; Antoine Flahault; Jeanine Pommier Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Lilian Monteiro Ferrari Viterbo; Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis; André Santana Costa; Diogo Guedes Vidal Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-08-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Catherine E Huggins; Jessica Jong; Gloria K W Leung; Sophie Page; Rochelle Davis; Maxine P Bonham Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 4.996