Literature DB >> 23935309

Moving toward the utilization of all donated liver grafts. The "b-list" concept.

D Vrochides1, P Metrakos.   

Abstract

The number of available liver grafts is not sufficient to meet the current demand. A significant number of patients succumb before they receive a liver graft. However, approximately 10% of marginal livers are considered unsuitable for donation and are discarded. Calculating the primary non-function probability for any given liver graft can be performed using prognostic tools, such as the Donor Risk Index and the Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index. On the other hand, mortality on the waiting list, which is sometimes more than 15% per year of enlistment, directly correlates with its size, the graft supply and the gravity of the potential recipients' clinical condition. Up to 30% of the potential recipients will never receive a graft. The purpose of this invited commentary is to examine whether the literature supports the utilization of the marginal liver grafts that would otherwise be discarded. It appears that there is sufficient evidence in favor of the development of a "B-list" for potential liver graft recipients. It should comprise all of the candidates who were definitely removed from the primary waiting list or were never included. The potential "B-list" recipients should only be eligible to receive grafts that would otherwise be discarded, i.e., "B-livers". Enrollment in a "B-list" might not only increase the overall patient survival (enlisted and transplanted combined) but might also improve candidate quality of life by maintaining their hope for a cure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Liver transplantation; equity; marginal grafts; organ allocation; utility; waiting list

Year:  2012        PMID: 23935309      PMCID: PMC3738604     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippokratia        ISSN: 1108-4189            Impact factor:   0.471


  26 in total

1.  MELD and PELD: application of survival models to liver allocation.

Authors:  R H Wiesner; S V McDiarmid; P S Kamath; E B Edwards; M Malinchoc; W K Kremers; R A Krom; W R Kim
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Contribution of true cold and rewarming ischemia times to factors determining outcome after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  T Piratvisuth; J M Tredger; K A Hayllar; R Williams
Journal:  Liver Transpl Surg       Date:  1995-09

3.  The survival benefit of deceased donor liver transplantation as a function of candidate disease severity and donor quality.

Authors:  D E Schaubel; C S Sima; N P Goodrich; S Feng; R M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Outcomes of 385 adult-to-adult living donor liver transplant recipients: a report from the A2ALL Consortium.

Authors:  Kim M Olthoff; Robert M Merion; Rafik M Ghobrial; Michael M Abecassis; Jeffrey H Fair; Robert A Fisher; Chris E Freise; Igal Kam; Timothy L Pruett; James E Everhart; Tempie E Hulbert-Shearon; Brenda W Gillespie; Jean C Emond
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Fatty liver in liver transplantation and surgery.

Authors:  M Selzner; P A Clavien
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.115

6.  A preliminary European study on extended-criteria liver donation and transplant recipient consent.

Authors:  P Bruzzone
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.066

7.  Normalised intrinsic mortality risk in liver transplantation: European Liver Transplant Registry study.

Authors:  R Adam; V Cailliez; P Majno; V Karam; P McMaster; R Y Caine; J O'Grady; R Pichlmayr; P Neuhaus; J B Otte; K Hoeckerstedt; H Bismuth
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-19       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Risk of end-stage renal disease among liver transplant recipients with pretransplant renal dysfunction.

Authors:  R Ruebner; D Goldberg; P L Abt; R Bahirwani; M Levine; D Sawinski; R D Bloom; P P Reese
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 9.  Candidate selection and organ allocation in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Muhammad F Dawwas; Alexander E Gimson
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 6.115

10.  UNOS Liver Registry: ten year survivals.

Authors:  Kayo Waki
Journal:  Clin Transpl       Date:  2006
View more
  1 in total

1.  Hypothermic machine perfusion reduces the incidences of early allograft dysfunction and biliary complications and improves 1-year graft survival after human liver transplantation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yili Zhang; Yangmin Zhang; Mei Zhang; Zhenhua Ma; Shengli Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.