Literature DB >> 23934948

Propensity score-based diagnostics for categorical response regression models.

Philip S Boonstra1, Irina Bondarenko1, Sung Kyun Park2, Pantel S Vokonas3, Bhramar Mukherjee1.   

Abstract

For binary or categorical response models, most goodness-of-fit statistics are based on the notion of partitioning the subjects into groups or regions and comparing the observed and predicted responses in these regions by a suitable chi-squared distribution. Existing strategies create this partition based on the predicted response probabilities, or propensity scores, from the fitted model. In this paper, we follow a retrospective approach, borrowing the notion of balancing scores used in causal inference to inspect the conditional distribution of the predictors, given the propensity scores, in each category of the response to assess model adequacy. We can use this diagnostic under both prospective and retrospective sampling designs, and it may ascertain general forms of misspecification. We first present simple graphical and numerical summaries that can be used in a binary logistic model. We then generalize the tools to propose model diagnostics for the proportional odds model. We illustrate the methods with simulation studies and two data examples: (i) a case-control study of the association between cumulative lead exposure and Parkinson's disease in the Boston, Massachusetts, area and (ii) and a cohort study of biomarkers possibly associated with diabetes, from the VA Normative Aging Study.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  balancing score; multinomial logistic; proportional odds; residual diagnostic; score test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23934948      PMCID: PMC3911784          DOI: 10.1002/sim.5940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  14 in total

Review 1.  Invited commentary: propensity scores.

Authors:  M M Joffe; P R Rosenbaum
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Model-checking techniques based on cumulative residuals.

Authors:  D Y Lin; L J Wei; Z Ying
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The use of cusums and other techniques in modelling continuous covariates in logistic regression.

Authors:  P Royston
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Model-checking techniques for stratified case-control studies.

Authors:  Patrick G Arbogast; D Y Lin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  On the estimation and use of propensity scores in case-control and case-cohort studies.

Authors:  Roger Månsson; Marshall M Joffe; Wenguang Sun; Sean Hennessy
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model.

Authors:  D W Hosmer; T Hosmer; S Le Cessie; S Lemeshow
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Ordinal regression methodology for ROC curves derived from correlated data.

Authors:  A Y Toledano; C Gatsonis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Matching With Doses in an Observational Study of a Media Campaign Against Drug Abuse.

Authors:  Bo Lu; Elaine Zanutto; Robert Hornik; Paul R Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Elevated C-reactive protein is a risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes in Japanese Americans.

Authors:  Shuhei Nakanishi; Kiminori Yamane; Nozomu Kamei; Masamichi Okubo; Nobuoki Kohno
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Neurohumoral stimulation in type-2-diabetes as an emerging disease concept.

Authors:  R U Pliquett; M Fasshauer; M Blüher; R Paschke
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 9.951

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.