UNLABELLED: Anatomical face mask with an air cushion rim might be placed accidentally in a false orientation on the newborn's face or filled with various amounts of air during neonatal resuscitation. Both false orientation as well as variable filling may reduce a tight seal and therefore hamper effective positive pressure ventilation (PPV). We aimed to measure the influence of mask type and mask position on the effectiveness of PPV. Twenty neonatal staff members delivered PPV to a modified, leak-free manikin. Resuscitation parameters were recorded using a self-inflatable bag PPV with an Intersurgical anatomical air cushion rim face mask (IS) and a size 0/1 Laerdal round face mask. Three different positions of the IS were tested: correct position, 90° and 180° rotation in reference to the midline of the face. IS masks in each correct position on the face but with different inflation of the air cushion (empty, 10, 20 and 30 mL). Mask leak was similar with mask rotation to either 90° or 180° but significantly increased from 27 (13-73) % with an adequate filled IS mask compared to 52 (16-83) % with an emptied air cushion rim. CONCLUSION: Anatomical-shaped face mask had similar mask leaks compared to round face mask. A wrongly positioned anatomical-shaped mask does not influence mask leak. Mask leak significantly increased once the air cushion rim was empty, which may cause failure in mask PPV.
UNLABELLED: Anatomical face mask with an air cushion rim might be placed accidentally in a false orientation on the newborn's face or filled with various amounts of air during neonatal resuscitation. Both false orientation as well as variable filling may reduce a tight seal and therefore hamper effective positive pressure ventilation (PPV). We aimed to measure the influence of mask type and mask position on the effectiveness of PPV. Twenty neonatal staff members delivered PPV to a modified, leak-free manikin. Resuscitation parameters were recorded using a self-inflatable bag PPV with an Intersurgical anatomical air cushion rim face mask (IS) and a size 0/1 Laerdal round face mask. Three different positions of the IS were tested: correct position, 90° and 180° rotation in reference to the midline of the face. IS masks in each correct position on the face but with different inflation of the air cushion (empty, 10, 20 and 30 mL). Mask leak was similar with mask rotation to either 90° or 180° but significantly increased from 27 (13-73) % with an adequate filled IS mask compared to 52 (16-83) % with an emptied air cushion rim. CONCLUSION: Anatomical-shaped face mask had similar mask leaks compared to round face mask. A wrongly positioned anatomical-shaped mask does not influence mask leak. Mask leak significantly increased once the air cushion rim was empty, which may cause failure in mask PPV.
Authors: Kim Schilleman; Ruben S Witlox; Enrico Lopriore; Colin J Morley; Frans J Walther; Arjan B te Pas Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2010-06-30 Impact factor: 5.747
Authors: Fiona E Wood; Colin J Morley; Jennifer A Dawson; C Omar F Kamlin; Louise S Owen; Susan Donath; Peter G Davis Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2007-11-26 Impact factor: 5.747
Authors: Eric B Bauman; Aaron M Joffe; Lynn Lenz; Stephen A DeVries; Scott Hetzel; Samuel P Seider Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2010-06-17 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Georg M Schmölzer; Jennifer A Dawson; C Omar F Kamlin; Colm P F O'Donnell; Colin J Morley; Peter G Davis Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2010-11-16 Impact factor: 5.747
Authors: C P F O'Donnell; P G Davis; R Lau; P A Dargaville; L W Doyle; C J Morley Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2005-05-04 Impact factor: 5.747
Authors: Fiona E Wood; Colin J Morley; Jennifer A Dawson; C Omar F Kamlin; Louise S Owen; Susan Donath; Peter G Davis Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2007-11-26 Impact factor: 5.747
Authors: D Cheung; Q Mian; P-Y Cheung; M O'Reilly; K Aziz; S van Os; G Pichler; G M Schmölzer Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 2.521