Literature DB >> 23932636

Detection and classification of different liver lesions: comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI versus multiphasic spiral CT in a clinical single centre investigation.

Joachim Böttcher1, Andreas Hansch, Alexander Pfeil, Peter Schmidt, Ansgar Malich, Albrecht Schneeweiss, Martin H Maurer, Florian Streitparth, Ulf K Teichgräber, Diane M Renz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic efficacy of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vs. multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for the detection and classification of focal liver lesions, differentiated also for lesion entity and size; a separate analysis of pre- and postcontrast images as well as T2-weighted MRI sequences of focal and exclusively solid lesions was integrated.
METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with 130 focal liver lesions underwent MDCT (64-detector-row; contrast medium iopromide; native, arterial, portalvenous, venous phase) and MRI (1.5-T; dynamic and tissue-specific phase 20 min after application of Gd-EOB-DTPA). Hepatic lesions were verified against a standard of reference (SOR). CT and MR images were independently analysed by four blinded radiologists on an ordinal 6-point-scale, determining lesion classification and diagnostic confidence.
RESULTS: Among 130 lesions, 68 were classified as malignant and 62 as benign by SOR. The detection of malignant and benign lesions differed significantly between combined and postcontrast MRI vs. MDCT; overall detection rate was 91.5% for combined MRI and 80.4% for combined MDCT (p<0.05). Considering all four readers together, combined MDCT achieved sensitivity of 66.2%, specificity of 79.0%, and diagnostic accuracy of 72.3%; combined MRI reached superior diagnostic efficacy: sensitivity 86.8%, specificity 94.4%, accuracy 90.4% (p<0.05). Differentiated for lesion size, in particular lesions <20mm revealed diagnostic benefit by MRI. Postcontrast MRI also achieved higher overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy compared to postcontrast MDCT for focal and exclusively solid liver lesions (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Combined and postcontrast Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI provided significantly higher overall detection rate and diagnostic accuracy, including low inter-observer variability, compared to MDCT in a single centre study.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Gadoxetic acid; Gd-EOB-DTPA; Liver; Magnetic resonance imaging; Sequence analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23932636     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  19 in total

Review 1.  Invisible fat on CT: making it visible by MRI.

Authors:  Emre Ünal; Ali Devrim Karaosmanoğlu; Deniz Akata; Mustafa Nasuh Özmen; Muşturay Karçaaltıncaba
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 2.  Focal liver lesions detection and characterization: The advantages of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI.

Authors:  Stefano Palmucci
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2014-07-27

Review 3.  [CT and MRI of the liver: when, what, why?]

Authors:  J Budjan; S O Schoenberg; U I Attenberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  [Radiological diagnostics in CUP syndrome].

Authors:  P M Kazmierczak; K Nikolaou; A Rominger; A Graser; M F Reiser; C C Cyran
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Liver segmentation and metastases detection in MR images using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Mariëlle J A Jansen; Hugo J Kuijf; Maarten Niekel; Wouter B Veldhuis; Frank J Wessels; Max A Viergever; Josien P W Pluim
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-10-15

Review 6.  Focal liver lesions: Practical magnetic resonance imaging approach.

Authors:  António P Matos; Fernanda Velloni; Miguel Ramalho; Mamdoh AlObaidy; Aruna Rajapaksha; Richard C Semelka
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-08-08

Review 7.  [Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms].

Authors:  K Beiderwellen; A Sabet; T C Lauenstein; H Lahner; T D Poeppel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis risk after liver magnetic resonance imaging with gadoxetate disodium in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment: results of a prospective, open-label, multicenter study.

Authors:  Thomas Lauenstein; Francisco Ramirez-Garrido; Young Hoon Kim; Sung Eun Rha; Jens Ricke; Sith Phongkitkarun; Joachim Boettcher; Rajan T Gupta; Pornpim Korpraphong; Wiwatana Tanomkiat; Julia Furtner; Peter S Liu; Maren Henry; Jan Endrikat
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Systemic treatment in breast cancer: a primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Aya Y Michaels; Abhishek R Keraliya; Sree Harsha Tirumani; Atul B Shinagare; Nikhil H Ramaiya
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2015-11-13

Review 10.  Gadolinium Ethoxybenzyl Diethylenetriamine Pentaacetic Acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Ye; Jun Liu; Han Ouyang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.