Literature DB >> 23931967

Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on tricuspid valve regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension following mitral valve replacement.

Emiliano Angeloni1, Giovanni Melina, Umberto Benedetto, Antonino Roscitano, Simone Refice, Cesare Quarto, Cosimo Comito, Philippe Pibarot, Riccardo Sinatra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mitral PPM can be equated to residual mitral stenosis, which may halt the expected postoperative improvement of PH and concomitant functional tricuspid regurgitation (fTR). Aim of the present study is to evaluate the impact of mitral prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) on late tricuspid valve regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension (PH).
METHODS: A total of 210 patients undergoing isolated mitral valve replacement (MVR) were investigated. Mitral valve effective orifice area was determined by the continuity equation and indexed for body surface area (EOAi) and PPM was defined as EOAi ≤ 1.2 cm(2)/m(2). Pulmonary hypertension (PH) was defined as systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) > 40 mmHg. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up (median 27 months) was 100% completed. A total of 88/210 (42%) patients developed mitral PPM.
RESULTS: There were no significative differences in baseline and operative characteristics between patients with and without PPM. At follow-up, the prevalence of fTR ≥ 2+ (57%vs.22%; p = 0.0001), and PH (62%vs.24%;p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in patients with PPM. On multivariable regression analysis, EOAi (p < 0.0001) and preoperative left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter (p < 0.0001) were found to be independently associated with fTR decrease after MVR. In addition, EOAi (p < 0.0001) and LV ejection fraction (p < 0.0001) were independently associated with PH decrease after MVR. No significant differences in mortality rates were found between patients having or not PPM.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that mitral PPM is associated with the persistence of fTR and PH following MVR. These findings support the realization of tricuspid valve annuloplasty when PPM is anticipated at the time of operation.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular surgery; Mitral mismatch; Pulmonary hypertension; Tricuspid regurgitation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23931967     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  8 in total

1.  Echocardiographically derived effective valve opening area in mitral prostheses: a comparative analysis of various calculations using continuity equation and pressure half time method.

Authors:  Nikola Bogunovic; Dieter Horstkotte; Lothar Faber; Lukas Bogunovic; Frank van Buuren
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Predictors of persistent pulmonary hypertension after mitral valve replacement.

Authors:  Sem Briongos Figuero; José Luis Moya Mur; Alberto García-Lledó; Tomasa Centella; Luisa Salido; Álvaro Aceña Navarro; Ana García Martín; Ignacio García-Andrade; Enrique Oliva; José Luis Zamorano
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Negatively Affects Outcomes after Mitral Valve Replacement: Meta-Analysis of 10,239 Patients.

Authors:  Michel Pompeu Barros Oliveira Sá; Luiz Rafael Pereira Cavalcanti; Sérgio da Costa Rayol; Roberto Gouvea Silva Diniz; Alexandre Motta Menezes; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot; Ricardo Carvalho Lima
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr

4.  Mitral valve replacement in mitral stenosis; the problem of small left ventricle.

Authors:  Hesham Alkady; Ahmed Saber; Sobhy Abouramadan; Ahmed Elnaggar; Sherif Nasr; Eman Mahmoud
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch after Mitral Valve Replacement: Comparison of Different Methods of Effective Orifice Area Calculation.

Authors:  In Jeong Cho; Geu Ru Hong; Seung Hyun Lee; Sak Lee; Byung Chul Chang; Chi Young Shim; Hyuk Jae Chang; Jong Won Ha; Namsik Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  Comparison of Mitral Valve Repair versus Replacement for the Progression of Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation.

Authors:  Yang Gao; Shubin Li; Xijing Zhuang; Feng Gao; Lei Shi; Xu Meng
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 1.520

7.  Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on early and late outcomes after mitral valve replacement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meng-Wei Tan; Yi-Fan Bai; Xiao-Hong Liu; Zhi-Yun Xu; Zhao An; Ye Ma; Li-Bo Zhao; Bai-Ling Li
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 8.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch after mitral valve replacement: A pooled meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier-derived individual patient data.

Authors:  Anton Tomšič; Bardia Arabkhani; Jan W Schoones; Jonathan R G Etnel; Nina A Marsan; Robert J M Klautz; Meindert Palmen
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 1.778

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.