Literature DB >> 23929385

Assessment of nonlethal methods for predicting muscle tissue mercury concentrations in coastal marine fishes.

Maria N Piraino1, David L Taylor.   

Abstract

Caudal fin clips and dorsolateral scales were analyzed as a potential nonlethal approach for predicting muscle tissue mercury (Hg) concentrations in marine fish. Target fish were collected from the Narragansett Bay (Rhode Island, USA) and included black sea bass Centropristis striata [n = 54, 14-55 cm total length (TL)], bluefish Pomatomus saltatrix (n = 113, 31-73 cm TL), striped bass Morone saxatilis (n = 40, 34-102 cm TL), summer flounder Paralichthys dentatus (n = 64, 18-55 cm TL), and tautog Tautoga onitis (n = 102, 27-61 cm TL). For all fish species, Hg concentrations were greatest in muscle tissue [mean muscle Hg = 0.47-1.18 mg/kg dry weight (dw)] followed by fin clips (0.03-0.09 mg/kg dw) and scales (0.01-0.07 mg/kg dw). The coefficient of determination (R (2)) derived from power regressions of intraspecies muscle Hg against fin and scale Hg ranged between 0.35 and 0.78 (mean R (2) = 0.57) and 0.14-0.37 (mean R (2) = 0.30), respectively. The inclusion of fish body size interaction effects in the regression models improved the predictive ability of fins (R (2) = 0.63-0.80; mean = 0.71) and scales (R (2) = 0.33-0.71; mean = 0.53). According to the high level of uncertainty within the regression models (R (2) values) and confidence interval widths, scale analysis was deemed an ineffective tool for estimating muscle tissue Hg concentrations in the target species. In contrast, the examination of fin clips as predictors of muscle Hg had value as a cursory screening tool; however, this method should not be the foundation for developing human consumption advisories. It is also noteworthy that the efficacy of these nonlethal techniques was highly variable across fishes and likely depends on species-specific life-history characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23929385      PMCID: PMC3834091          DOI: 10.1007/s00244-013-9946-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0090-4341            Impact factor:   2.804


  13 in total

1.  A biopsy procedure for determining filet and predicting whole-fish mercury concentration.

Authors:  S A Peterson; J Van Sickle; R M Hughes; J A Schacher; S F Echols
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Mercury in fish scales as an assessment method for predicting muscle tissue mercury concentrations in largemouth bass.

Authors:  J L Lake; S A Ryba; J R Serbst; A D Libby
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Ontogenetic patterns in bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix) feeding ecology and the effect on mercury biomagnification.

Authors:  Joseph T Szczebak; David L Taylor
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Effects of diet composition and trophic structure on mercury bioaccumulation in temperate flatfishes.

Authors:  Eric J Payne; David L Taylor
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Selenium concentrations in the Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius): relationship with flows in the upper Colorado River.

Authors:  B C Osmundson; T W May; D B Osmundson
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Impact of selenium and other trace elements on the endangered adult razorback sucker.

Authors:  Steven J Hamilton; Kathy M Holley; Kevin J Buhl; Fern A Bullard; L Ken Weston; Susan F McDonald
Journal:  Environ Toxicol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.119

7.  Evaluation of potentially nonlethal sampling methods for monitoring mercury concentrations in smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu).

Authors:  C J Schmitt; W G Brumbaugh
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Methylmercury in marine ecosystems: spatial patterns and processes of production, bioaccumulation, and biomagnification.

Authors:  Celia Chen; Aria Amirbahman; Nicholas Fisher; Gareth Harding; Carl Lamborg; Diane Nacci; David Taylor
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.184

9.  Bioaccumulation and trophic transfer of mercury in striped bass (Morone saxatilis) and tautog (Tautoga onitis) from the Narragansett Bay (Rhode Island, USA).

Authors:  Maria N Piraino; David L Taylor
Journal:  Mar Environ Res       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.130

10.  Analysis of fin clips as a nonlethal method for monitoring mercury in fish.

Authors:  Kristofer R Rolfhus; Mark B Sandheinrich; James G Wiener; Sean W Bailey; Kristen A Thoreson; Chad R Hammerschmidt
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  3 in total

1.  Mercury contamination in Southern New England coastal fisheries and dietary habits of recreational anglers and their families: Implications to human health and issuance of consumption advisories.

Authors:  David L Taylor; Patrick R Williamson
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  The Novel Application of Non-Lethal Citizen Science Tissue Sampling in Recreational Fisheries.

Authors:  Samuel M Williams; Bonnie J Holmes; Julian G Pepperell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Non-Lethal Sampling Supports Integrative Movement Research in Freshwater Fish.

Authors:  Matt J Thorstensen; Carolyn A Vandervelde; William S Bugg; Sonya Michaleski; Linh Vo; Theresa E Mackey; Michael J Lawrence; Ken M Jeffries
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.772

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.