Literature DB >> 15657811

A biopsy procedure for determining filet and predicting whole-fish mercury concentration.

S A Peterson1, J Van Sickle, R M Hughes, J A Schacher, S F Echols.   

Abstract

Although mercury contamination of fish is a widespread phenomenon, its regional evaluation is hindered by the reluctance of permitting agencies to grant collection permits, problems in securing adequate freezer space, and time to process whole, large fish or filets. We evaluated mercury concentrations in 210 filet biopsies from 65 sites in 12 western states relative to whole-body mercury concentration in the same fish. We found a highly significant relationship (r(2) = 0.96) between biopsy and whole-fish mercury concentrations for 13 piscivorous and nonpiscivorous fish species. We concluded that relative to conventional fish-tissue sampling and analysis procedures for whole fish or filets, the biopsy procedure for mercury in fish tissue is nonlethal, less cumbersome, more likely to be permitted by fisheries agencies, and a precise and accurate means for determining both filet and whole-fish mercury concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15657811     DOI: 10.1007/s00244-004-0260-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0090-4341            Impact factor:   2.804


  6 in total

1.  Nutrient supply and mercury dynamics in marine ecosystems: a conceptual model.

Authors:  Charles T Driscoll; Celia Y Chen; Chad R Hammerschmidt; Robert P Mason; Cynthia C Gilmour; Elsie M Sunderland; Ben K Greenfield; Kate L Buckman; Carl H Lamborg
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Ecological risk of methylmercury to piscivorous fish of the Great Lakes region.

Authors:  Mark B Sandheinrich; Satyendra P Bhavsar; R A Bodaly; Paul E Drevnick; Eric A Paul
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Contaminant concentrations in whole-body fish and shellfish from US estuaries.

Authors:  James Harvey; Linda Harwell; J Kevin Summers
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Assessment of nonlethal methods for predicting muscle tissue mercury concentrations in coastal marine fishes.

Authors:  Maria N Piraino; David L Taylor
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Risks from mercury in anadromous fish collected from Penobscot River, Maine.

Authors:  Lisa Jo Melnyk; John Lin; Daniel H Kusnierz; Katherine Pugh; James T Durant; Rene J Suarez-Soto; Raghuraman Venkatapathy; Devi Sundaravadivelu; Anthony Morris; James M Lazorchak; Gary Perlman; Michael A Stover
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 10.753

6.  Mercury Contamination in Riverine Sediments and Fish Associated with Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Madre de Dios, Peru.

Authors:  Gerardo Martinez; Stephen A McCord; Charles T Driscoll; Svetoslava Todorova; Steven Wu; Julio F Araújo; Claudia M Vega; Luis E Fernandez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.