Literature DB >> 23929313

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and overweight patients.

Huseyin Yilmaz1, Husnu Alptekin, Fahrettin Acar, Akin Calisir, Mustafa Sahin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modifications of minimally invasive laparoscopic cholecystectomy have been achieved, including single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC). In the current literature, the effects of high body mass index (BMI) on the results of the surgical therapy have not been sufficiently investigated after SILC. We evaluated perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications of overweight patients who underwent SILC.
METHODS: Two hundred two patients who underwent SILC were retrospectively evaluated. The data included demographics and outcomes such as postoperative complications and postoperative hospitalization were obtained. For the outcome analyses, patients were divided into two group according to their BMI (<30 vs ≥ 30 kg/m(2)).
RESULTS: Of the 202 patients, 157 patients were in normal weight group and 45 patients were in overweight group. Mean operative time was 31.67 ± 6.4 min in overweight group and 26.6 ± 5.3 min in normal weight group. The wound infection rate for overweight and normal weight patients was 13.3 and 7.6 %, respectively. Eleven of the 202 patients (5.4 %) experienced port-site hernia (PSH).
CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study comparing overweight and normal weight patient in SILC demonstrates that SILC is associated with the prolonged operative time, high additional port requirement, and increased wound complication rate. PSH occurrence rate was high after SILC irrespective of the body weight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23929313     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-013-1041-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  32 in total

Review 1.  Critical appraisal of single port access cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P Allemann; M Schafer; N Demartines
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Early experience with SILS port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  Alan A Saber; Tarek H El-Ghazaly
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.719

3.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison with the gold standard.

Authors:  Sigi Joseph; B Todd Moore; G Brent Sorensen; John W Earley; Fengming Tang; Phil Jones; Kimberly M Brown
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the first 100 outpatients.

Authors:  Jose Erbella; Gary M Bunch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S R Markar; A Karthikesalingam; S Thrumurthy; L Muirhead; J Kinross; P Paraskeva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a safe and reproducible alternative.

Authors:  Oscar Vidal; Mauro Valentini; Juan J Espert; Cesar Ginesta; Jaime Jimeno; Alberto Martinez; Guerson Benarroch; Juan C Garcia-Valdecasas
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.878

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the obese: results with the traditional and fundus-first technique.

Authors:  Massimiliano Tuveri; Valentina Borsezio; Pietro Giorgio Calò; Fabio Medas; Augusto Tuveri; Angelo Nicolosi
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 8.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: single institution experience and literature review.

Authors:  Yasumitsu Hirano; Toru Watanabe; Tsuneyuki Uchida; Shuhei Yoshida; Kanae Tawaraya; Hideaki Kato; Osamu Hosokawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Impact of obesity on short-term results of laparoscopic rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  Thierry Bège; Bernard Lelong; Daniel Francon; Olivier Turrini; Jérome Guiramand; Jean-Robert Delpero
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The effect of obesity on the outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  Jacob A Chisholm; Glyn G Jamieson; Carolyn J Lally; Peter G Devitt; Philip A Game; David I Watson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: primary experience and review of the English literature.

Authors:  Dianbo Yao; Shuodong Wu; Yu Tian; Ying Fan; Jing Kong; Yongnan Li
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for biliary tract disease.

Authors:  Shu-Hung Chuang; Chih-Sheng Lin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Comparison of outcomes after single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in relation to patient body mass index.

Authors:  Eun Jeong Jang; Young Hoon Roh; Chan Joong Choi; Min Chan Kim; Kwan Woo Kim; Hong Jo Choi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Impact of obesity on surgical outcome after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Toru Obuchi; Noriaki Kameyama; Masato Tomita; Hiroaki Mitsuhashi; Ryohei Miyata; Shigeaki Baba
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  Single-Port Laparoscopic and Robotic Cholecystectomy in Obesity (>25 kg/m2).

Authors:  Eun Jeong Jang; Young Hoon Roh; Chang Moo Kang; Dong Kyun Kim; Ki Jae Park
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Minimally Invasive Single-Site Cholecystectomy in Obese Patients: Laparoscopic vs. Robotic.

Authors:  Kyu Min Lee; Dae Hun Han; Seoung Yoon Roh; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Woo Jung Lee; Chang Moo Kang
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2019-09-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.